202:
577:
says, the problem isn't that there are bad references in the article that need to be removed, the problem is that there aren't any good ones. The above isn't an argument to keep the article so much as it is a statement that you don't understand why other editors are objecting to the article. The
562:
You've been asked multiple times in the help IRC channel to provide sources to establish notability, and you've been unable to. Additionally, as other editors have mentioned here, we've been unable to locate sources ourselves. -- Thanks,
405:", and therefore does not pass Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for independent sourcing. The same goes for the www.infoq.com sources. The FCW article is more significant, but only briefly makes mention of EXo Platform
166:
528:- Hello, I want to have acces on the page to modify the sources ... Otherwise, quote me the references to remove and the necessary recommendations to optimize this page and to be publish...
209:
119:
349:
is a review in a reliable source which I would consider in-depth. The source already in the article from CMS Wire I would also count as reliable with a professional editorial team.
408:. In short, EXo Platform definitely exists but its existence has not resulted in the in-depth, independent third party sources needed to establish encyclopedic notability.--
426:
160:
403:
After we had developed a
Learning Management System (LMS), we decided to provide a custom web site as the basis for a Learning Content Management System (LCMS)
472:. These marketing platforms exist specifically to give the impression of media coverage to marketing clients. They are not evidence of complying with either
126:
218:
248:
401:. Sources like www.theserverside.com seem to be directly tied to the team that runs EXo, with the articles cited using language like "
17:
358:
92:
87:
585:
491:
465:
96:
234:
181:
79:
148:
611:
40:
207:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
280:
142:
375:
Are you sure? CMSWire looks to me like an SEO-y industry blog more than a reliable source, to me. -- Thanks,
452:. Other articles are in PR wires although the sites themselves are sort of stealthy about it. For example,
540:
264:
238:
457:
223:
138:
607:
588:
568:
552:
517:
494:
433:
417:
380:
366:
336:
61:
36:
83:
548:
361:
57:
188:
582:
488:
430:
174:
406:
315:
75:
67:
533:
413:
331:
270:
201:
481:
477:
398:
314:
References appear to point to either press releases, unreliable sources, or passing mentions. A
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
606:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
346:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
473:
544:
449:
350:
154:
53:
579:
513:
505:
485:
529:
409:
319:
298:
286:
254:
113:
233:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
574:
564:
376:
509:
453:
600:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
469:
461:
196:
227:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments,
444:
The only independent, significant source appears to be the
217:
among
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has
318:
only revealed more press releases and passing mentions.
109:
105:
101:
173:
187:
470:not truly an independent journalistic organization
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
614:). No further edits should be made to this page.
425:Note: This discussion has been included in the
427:list of Software-related deletion discussions
247:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected
8:
578:links given above should help with that.
424:
397:Not seeing the sigcov needed to establish
221:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
241:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
456:article is actually a press release,
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
460:claims it is independent but it is
462:owned by a B2B a marketing network
24:
458:the article in "The Server Side"
200:
536:)14:25, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
385:Does a single review count as
1:
589:15:00, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
569:14:57, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
553:10:43, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
518:16:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
495:16:26, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
434:04:29, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
418:15:41, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
381:13:59, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
367:19:34, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
337:19:10, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
237:on the part of others and to
62:10:47, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
508:. No significant coverage.
476:or applicable SNG's (i.e.,
631:
603:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
279:; accounts blocked for
249:single-purpose accounts
219:policies and guidelines
454:this "Digital Journal"
504:Agree with points by
231:by counting votes.
210:not a majority vote
555:
436:
312:
311:
308:
235:assume good faith
622:
605:
538:
387:
386:
334:
330:
327:
324:
306:
294:
278:
262:
243:
213:, but instead a
204:
197:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
630:
629:
625:
624:
623:
621:
620:
619:
618:
612:deletion review
601:
539:— Striking per
466:CMSWire article
364:
332:
328:
325:
322:
296:
284:
268:
252:
239:sign your posts
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
628:
626:
617:
616:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
557:
556:
521:
520:
498:
497:
438:
437:
421:
420:
391:
390:
389:
388:
383:
370:
369:
362:
310:
309:
205:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
627:
615:
613:
609:
604:
598:
597:
590:
587:
584:
581:
576:
572:
571:
570:
566:
561:
560:
559:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
541:WP:SOCKSTRIKE
537:
535:
531:
527:
523:
522:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
500:
499:
496:
493:
490:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
468:is similarly
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
440:
439:
435:
432:
428:
423:
422:
419:
415:
411:
407:
404:
400:
396:
393:
392:
384:
382:
378:
374:
373:
372:
371:
368:
365:
359:
357:
356:
353:
348:
344:
341:
340:
339:
338:
335:
321:
317:
304:
300:
292:
288:
282:
276:
272:
266:
260:
256:
250:
246:
242:
240:
236:
230:
226:
225:
220:
216:
212:
211:
206:
203:
199:
198:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
602:
599:
525:
524:
501:
445:
441:
402:
394:
354:
351:
342:
313:
302:
290:
281:sockpuppetry
274:
263:; suspected
258:
244:
232:
228:
222:
214:
208:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
76:EXo Platform
68:EXo Platform
49:
47:
31:
28:
161:free images
545:Malcolmxl5
450:Elahrairah
215:discussion
54:Malcolmxl5
608:talk page
586:(contrib)
580:Eggishorn
506:Eggishorn
492:(contrib)
486:Eggishorn
448:found by
316:WP:BEFORE
271:canvassed
265:canvassed
224:consensus
37:talk page
610:or in a
530:Bjaouane
482:WP:NCORP
478:WP:NSOFT
446:PCMag UK
431:MT Train
410:SamHolt6
399:WP:NSOFT
355:Ahrairah
320:Drewmutt
303:username
297:{{subst:
291:username
285:{{subst:
275:username
269:{{subst:
259:username
253:{{subst:
120:View log
39:or in a
464:, the
267:users:
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
583:(talk)
502:Delete
489:(talk)
474:WP:GNG
442:Delete
395:Delete
363:berate
139:Google
97:delete
50:delete
575:Alfie
565:Alfie
377:Alfie
245:Note:
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
549:talk
543:. --
534:talk
526:Keep
514:talk
510:Wqwt
414:talk
347:this
343:Keep
333:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
573:As
567:.
484:).
480:or
379:.
326:^ᴥ^
299:csp
295:or
287:csm
255:spa
229:not
189:TWL
118:– (
551:)
516:)
429:.
416:)
352:El
345:-
305:}}
293:}}
283::
277:}}
261:}}
251::
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
547:(
532:(
512:(
412:(
360:⁄
329:)
323:(
307:.
301:|
289:|
273:|
257:|
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
