318:- The article is based on other such new stubs started by some of the most pro-policy editors of wikiproject airlines, they too created the stubs with whatever little information was available and when the airlines had not even recieved any coverage, why is this such an issue all of a sudden now? are any other editors that I might be unpopular with coaxing you to do this as I dont see them commenting on it despite posting at wikiproject airlines talk page hours ago. Let the article remain and grow as more info becomes available with time to be added here, along with "coverage" references, thats, how it goes dosent it? deleting it makes no sense, are you hoping for someone to recreate the article later once the airline is more prominent? quite irrational.
639:
is that all scheduled airlines, regardless of size, clear the notabilty bar. As there is an ICAO code assigned, this is considered an actual airline instead of some two-bit charter operator, and a 747 is not exactly a puddle-jumper. -
243:
has a solid date when operations begin. The lack of sources should not be grounds for deleting an article, it should be improved, this is what i am doing currently. Other airlines similar to this and equally as notable is
383:
Inspector, if you would like you could "userfy" Eagle
Express by putting it in your sandbox or a user subpage, which would give you opportunity to work on it some more and re-create the article if it's more notable.
234:
You cannot argue that the lack of coverage does not make it notable. notability isnt created by press coverage. This is a new airline and should have an article like any other new airline on wikipedia. For example
174:
502:– The airline is borderline on notability (couldn't find anything about it when I did a quick search of Flightglobal, ATW or Google News) but has plenty of sources, so I don't think it should be deleted. —
706:. I consider all airlines to be notable, especially if they have an ICAO code. Not all airlines have a 747 anyway, and although that in itself does not establish notability, that should be of interest.
368:
You are assuming that as it exists it will become notable - that is not how
Knowledge (XXG) works - Notability needs to be established first rather that using Knowledge (XXG) to try to make it notable.
745:
There might be a weak keep consensus here, but it would be weak. An extra week of discussion would be helpful, especially as there has been little discussion of the sources available.
478:
129:
456:
434:
412:
168:
657:
210:
134:
763:
687:- As mentioned, this appears to - barely - clear the notability bar, but I'd feel more comfortable if we could confim any scheduled service. -
594:
Comment: Just because it has one aircraft shouldn't mean it shouldn't have an article. All these airlines have to start somewhere. --
17:
102:
97:
66:
766:
275:
to establish notability. Lack of coverage shows no verifiability and so no notability. Existence is not enough and neither is
106:
53:
189:
276:
272:
156:
89:
801:
217:. only independent source is a news article about it starting. Google searches not finding any significant coverage.
40:
524:
The sources read like press releases and the
Routesonline and the star online articles are practically word for word.
268:
692:
645:
583:
354:
150:
566:
707:
323:
636:
797:
777:
618:
507:
389:
146:
36:
782:
749:
734:
710:
698:
673:
651:
622:
603:
589:
570:
552:
533:
515:
492:
470:
448:
426:
397:
378:
360:
327:
305:
288:
257:
226:
71:
543:
688:
641:
579:
350:
196:
182:
62:
720:
599:
562:
301:
253:
613:
an airline that has been allocated an ICAO code and operates a Boeing 747 must be of some note.
488:
466:
444:
422:
319:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
796:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
346:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
614:
548:
504:
386:
93:
759:
661:
575:
342:
214:
206:
162:
245:
58:
746:
731:
669:
595:
529:
374:
297:
284:
249:
222:
546:. Apart from that, the article relies strongly on sources related to the subject.--
484:
462:
440:
418:
123:
296:- I have added some more credible references although i have not finished yet. --
240:
85:
77:
723:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
239:
hasn't started operations and has its own article, the only difference is
665:
525:
370:
280:
218:
772:
769:
561:-- An airline that so far only has one aircraft can hardly be notable.
236:
209:. Speedy removed with the claim it met the notability criteria at
790:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
542:
All the statements are based on future events, much like
119:
115:
111:
181:
656:
If that is the consensus then it would be useful if
730:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
479:
195:
205:New air charter company. No indication of meeting
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
804:). No further edits should be made to this page.
632:Why must it be? 18:58, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
457:list of Business-related deletion discussions
435:list of Aviation-related deletion discussions
413:list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions
8:
660:actually said that rather than referring to
477:Note: This debate has been included in the
455:Note: This debate has been included in the
433:Note: This debate has been included in the
411:Note: This debate has been included in the
476:
454:
432:
410:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
658:WP:WikiProject Airlines/Notability
213:however, this page just refers to
211:WP:WikiProject Airlines/Notability
24:
783:13:51, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
750:19:17, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
735:19:16, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
711:06:01, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
699:18:50, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
674:19:24, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
652:18:50, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
623:16:34, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
604:15:24, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
590:18:50, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
571:14:38, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
553:12:49, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
534:12:44, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
516:05:37, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
493:21:44, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
471:21:43, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
449:21:43, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
427:21:43, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
398:15:11, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
379:23:44, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
361:21:46, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
328:20:33, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
306:15:31, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
289:14:59, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
258:14:55, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
227:14:44, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
762:. Source examples include:
72:02:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
821:
793:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
207:notability guidelines
758:- The topic passes
277:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
273:WP:reliable sources
48:The result was
781:
737:
708:Narutolovehinata5
495:
482:
473:
460:
451:
438:
429:
416:
347:there is no cabal
343:assume good faith
54:non-admin closure
812:
795:
780:
778:Northamerica1000
775:
729:
725:
695:
648:
586:
512:
483:
461:
439:
417:
394:
357:
269:WP:verifiability
200:
199:
185:
137:
127:
109:
70:
34:
820:
819:
815:
814:
813:
811:
810:
809:
808:
802:deletion review
791:
776:
743:Relist comment:
718:
697:
693:
650:
646:
588:
584:
508:
390:
359:
355:
142:
133:
100:
84:
81:
57:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
818:
816:
807:
806:
786:
785:
740:
739:
738:
727:
726:
715:
714:
713:
701:
691:
689:The Bushranger
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
644:
642:The Bushranger
635:Long-standing
626:
625:
608:
607:
606:
592:
582:
580:The Bushranger
537:
536:
497:
496:
474:
452:
430:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
381:
363:
353:
351:The Bushranger
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
246:Jett8 Airlines
203:
202:
139:
80:
75:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
817:
805:
803:
799:
794:
788:
787:
784:
779:
773:
770:
767:
764:
761:
757:
754:
753:
752:
751:
748:
744:
736:
733:
728:
724:
722:
717:
716:
712:
709:
705:
702:
700:
696:
694:One ping only
690:
686:
683:
682:
675:
671:
667:
663:
659:
655:
654:
653:
649:
647:One ping only
643:
638:
634:
633:
631:
628:
627:
624:
620:
616:
612:
609:
605:
601:
597:
593:
591:
587:
585:One ping only
581:
577:
574:
573:
572:
568:
564:
563:Peterkingiron
560:
557:
556:
555:
554:
551:
550:
545:
541:
535:
531:
527:
523:
520:
519:
518:
517:
514:
513:
511:
506:
501:
494:
490:
486:
480:
475:
472:
468:
464:
458:
453:
450:
446:
442:
436:
431:
428:
424:
420:
414:
409:
399:
396:
395:
393:
388:
382:
380:
376:
372:
367:
364:
362:
358:
356:One ping only
352:
348:
344:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
325:
321:
317:
307:
303:
299:
295:
292:
291:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
267:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
255:
251:
247:
242:
238:
233:
229:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
198:
194:
191:
188:
184:
180:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:Find sources:
140:
136:
131:
125:
121:
117:
113:
108:
104:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
82:
79:
76:
74:
73:
68:
64:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
792:
789:
755:
742:
741:
719:
703:
684:
637:WP:CONSENSUS
629:
610:
558:
547:
539:
538:
521:
509:
503:
499:
498:
391:
385:
365:
315:
314:
293:
265:
231:
230:
204:
192:
186:
178:
171:
165:
159:
153:
143:
49:
47:
31:
28:
615:MilborneOne
549:Jetstreamer
241:Eaglexpress
169:free images
86:Eaglexpress
78:Eaglexpress
798:talk page
685:Weak keep
500:Weak Keep
485:• Gene93k
463:• Gene93k
441:• Gene93k
419:• Gene93k
320:inspector
271:requires
37:talk page
800:or in a
747:ItsZippy
732:ItsZippy
721:Relisted
596:JetBlast
298:JetBlast
250:JetBlast
130:View log
67:Contribs
39:or in a
630:Comment
544:balling
522:Comment
366:Comment
341:Please
294:Comment
266:Comment
237:Fastjet
175:WP refs
163:scholar
103:protect
98:history
760:WP:GNG
662:WP:ORG
576:WP:JNN
559:Delete
540:Delete
316:Oppose
232:Oppose
215:WP:ORG
147:Google
107:delete
190:JSTOR
151:books
135:Stats
124:views
116:watch
112:links
16:<
756:Keep
704:Keep
670:talk
619:talk
611:Keep
600:talk
578:. -
567:talk
530:talk
510:dude
505:Comp
489:talk
467:talk
445:talk
423:talk
392:dude
387:Comp
375:talk
349:. -
324:talk
302:talk
285:talk
254:talk
248:. --
223:talk
183:FENS
157:news
120:logs
94:talk
90:edit
63:Talk
59:Dori
50:keep
666:noq
526:noq
371:noq
281:noq
219:noq
197:TWL
132:•
128:– (
52:. (
774:.
771:,
768:,
765:,
672:)
664:.
621:)
602:)
569:)
532:)
491:)
481:.
469:)
459:.
447:)
437:.
425:)
415:.
377:)
345:;
326:)
304:)
287:)
279:.
256:)
225:)
177:)
122:|
118:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
65:☯
56:)
668:(
617:(
598:(
565:(
528:(
487:(
465:(
443:(
421:(
384:—
373:(
322:(
300:(
283:(
252:(
221:(
201:)
193:·
187:·
179:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
149:(
141:(
138:)
126:)
88:(
69:☽
61:☾
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.