404:: A broad and oft used term covering a wide variety of phenomona that includes both pseudoscientific and non-pseudoscientific topics. While it might be true that the "subject" is covered by other pages, but this entry isn't just covering the subject of Earth Mysteries, it's covering the term too, which isn't really covered elsewhere. There is no good reason for Earht Mysteries not to be in Knowledge. -
181:
The nominator isn't even really contesting the article, but the subject of the article. Yeah, "earth mysteries" is complete and utter pseudoscience, the article says as much. That's exactly how
Knowledge should treat it. Explain what it is, explain why it's flawed. No valid reason to delete here.
208:
I disagree, Earth mysteries covers some of the same topics as the List of pseudosciences, but in no way does it apply to all of them. The way the article is written "Earth mysteries" is, in fact, the subject of the article. It's a short article, and it's very clearly not redundant with the list of
151:
by some people, and we have other articles covering the topic in greater detail. So long as the stub rightly directs people to that more extensive coverage, it serves a useful purpose. It requires some edits for NPOV ("multi-disciplined (holistic) approach?") but is otherwise fine. -
375:. This article mentions in the intro that scientists are skeptical of it, but then presents only "true believer" references, making it POV. I question that any pseudoscience is "valid." It looks like a linkfarm and catalog of pseudoscience books.
213:
wrong. But
Knowledge has lots of articles about people, groups and movements that are completely wrong. My point is that "earth mysteries" is a belief that some people (sadly) ascribe to, and as such, it would be derelict for us to delete it.
454:- this is a well-used term for a range of mysterious things (or pseudosciences if you want). I've even seen it on bookshop and library shelves. Not believing something is true is not grounds for an AfD.
372:
196:
442:- clean up and be more specific as to where the references are being used (references are there, the problem is I cannot tell where they are being used in the article) (:O) -
276:- this is a very widely used term and the article needs expanding, not deleting. "Pseudoscience" is certainly not a reason to delete - want to take a stab at nominating
115:
261:
as a valid form of pseudoscience, worthy of standing on its own. Sure, the article and the belief itself are both flawed, but at least the former can be fixed...
88:
83:
92:
122:"Earth mysteries" isn't a subject, it's one of dozens of terms used in crank pseudoscience to describe anything they think is odd.
75:
226:
17:
473:
36:
472:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
418:
but clean up (specific citations and the external links can be pruned) and possibly merge with the afornamed
458:
446:
432:
408:
392:
379:
359:
325:
320:
305:
268:
250:
229:
218:
203:
186:
169:
156:
136:
57:
349:
295:
247:
419:
337:
283:
123:
79:
262:
200:
166:
133:
405:
389:
314:
423:
455:
443:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
313:
per above. Sidenote: someone please take that stab - I would love to see that discussion.
195:
No, "earth mysteries" is being used not as a subject in itself, but as an umbrella term for
71:
63:
53:
215:
183:
334:
I suspect you'd suddenly wish you'd disabled "receive email" in your preferences...
126:
109:
376:
277:
241:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
153:
129:
50:
165:
The right way to direct people to more coverage is delete then redirect.
388:
The best way to deal with POV is to balance an entry, not delete it.
199:, we already have that list, and this term should redirect to it.
145:. The nomination makes the case for keeping this stub. The term
466:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
209:
psuedosciences. Look, people who follow Earth mysteries are
225:
Prehaps this should be a category rather than an article
105:
101:
97:
373:
List of pseudosciences and pseudoscientific concepts
246:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
476:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
422:(now "esoteric history"). ∞
493:
469:Please do not modify it.
459:20:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
447:19:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
433:04:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
409:20:09, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
393:20:09, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
380:18:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
360:23:05, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
326:22:54, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
306:16:18, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
269:16:16, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
251:15:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
230:11:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
219:19:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
204:19:25, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
187:19:20, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
170:18:46, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
157:18:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
137:17:18, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
58:04:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
280:and see what happens?
227:Think outside the box
197:a bunch of concepts
420:ancient mysteries
356:
302:
253:
130:by other articles
484:
471:
358:
355:
350:
347:
342:
323:
317:
304:
301:
296:
293:
288:
265:
264:Ten Pound Hammer
245:
242:
113:
95:
34:
492:
491:
487:
486:
485:
483:
482:
481:
480:
474:deletion review
467:
428:
351:
343:
338:
335:
321:
315:
297:
289:
284:
281:
263:
240:
154:Smerdis of Tlön
86:
72:Earth mysteries
70:
67:
64:Earth mysteries
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
490:
488:
479:
478:
462:
461:
449:
436:
435:
426:
412:
411:
398:
397:
396:
395:
383:
382:
365:
364:
363:
362:
329:
328:
308:
271:
255:
254:
244:
236:
235:
234:
233:
232:
223:
222:
221:
201:SchmuckyTheCat
190:
189:
175:
174:
173:
172:
167:SchmuckyTheCat
160:
159:
134:SchmuckyTheCat
120:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
489:
477:
475:
470:
464:
463:
460:
457:
453:
450:
448:
445:
441:
438:
437:
434:
431:
430:
421:
417:
414:
413:
410:
407:
403:
400:
399:
394:
391:
387:
386:
385:
384:
381:
378:
374:
370:
367:
366:
361:
357:
354:
353:(talk to me!)
348:
346:
341:
333:
332:
331:
330:
327:
324:
318:
316:CharacterZero
312:
309:
307:
303:
300:
299:(talk to me!)
294:
292:
287:
279:
275:
272:
270:
266:
260:
257:
256:
252:
249:
243:
238:
237:
231:
228:
224:
220:
217:
212:
207:
206:
205:
202:
198:
194:
193:
192:
191:
188:
185:
180:
177:
176:
171:
168:
164:
163:
162:
161:
158:
155:
150:
149:
144:
141:
140:
139:
138:
135:
131:
128:
125:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
56:
55:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
468:
465:
456:Totnesmartin
451:
444:Nima Baghaei
439:
424:
415:
401:
368:
352:
344:
339:
310:
298:
290:
285:
273:
258:
239:
210:
178:
147:
146:
142:
121:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
406:perfectblue
390:perfectblue
278:Scientology
274:Strong keep
259:Speedy keep
179:Speedy keep
124:The subject
211:completely
127:is covered
216:JayHenry
184:JayHenry
116:View log
248:W.marsh
148:is used
89:protect
84:history
377:Edison
340:irides
286:irides
93:delete
369:Merge
345:centi
322:Speak
291:centi
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
452:Keep
440:Keep
416:Keep
402:Keep
311:Keep
143:Keep
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
46:keep
371:to
336:—
282:—
267:•
114:– (
425:Σɛ
319:|
214:--
182:--
132:.
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
54:13
51:Sr
48:.
429:²
427:Þ
118:)
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.