266:
I'm not expecting anything other than a reasonable discussion. Are you saying that you know of reliable sources that prove notability but you're going to keep them to yourself? the fact that a few notable conferences used this software does not bestow notability on the software any more than it
219:
Second nomination. This page is an advertisement for a software product used in technical conferences. Several years after the original AfD there are still no reliable sources to support the claim that it is "used extensively", and no other indications of notability. There are plenty of similar
347:
Then please reinstate them, or at least give an example of what you mean. I've looked back at earlier versions and I can't find anything that indicates notability, just a few examples of use - which you could find for pretty much any product you care to mention.
366:. It's extremely widely used in computer science - it's essentially used by all conferences and workshops in my field. I was able to find and add two Springer-published academic sources that discuss or mention it with little effort. --
243:
now have
Knowledge (XXG) articles, so it would be easy to check the homepages of some (or all) of them to see whether they use EasyChair as their submission system. However please note that I'm not going to
188:
87:
141:
383:
or mention elsewhere at best as there seems to be acceptable sourcing and if further is available....but if not, mention elsewhere. Notifying the only still active AfDer
307:
285:
182:
148:
82:
240:
239:. Before this edit, there was a list of notable conference using EasyChair, as to provide evidence for the extensive use. A lot of
17:
332:
Notable. The article is missing sources only because the nominator has removed them from the article, they should be reinstated. —
398:
375:
338:
321:
299:
276:
261:
229:
66:
114:
109:
203:
118:
417:
40:
170:
101:
62:
393:
371:
164:
413:
36:
160:
353:
272:
225:
58:
388:
367:
196:
311:
289:
210:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
412:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
54:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
257:
349:
268:
249:
221:
334:
176:
105:
316:
294:
135:
253:
97:
72:
384:
248:
so now, as I'm not sure it would be the kind of evidence that you, @
406:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
267:
bestows notability on the brand of toilet paper they used.
236:
131:
127:
123:
235:
Evidence would be easy to provide by partly reverting
195:
209:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
420:). No further edits should be made to this page.
88:Articles for deletion/EasyChair (2nd nomination)
308:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
286:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
306:Note: This debate has been included in the
284:Note: This debate has been included in the
305:
283:
80:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
79:
24:
83:Articles for deletion/EasyChair
1:
399:07:18, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
376:19:51, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
339:10:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
322:15:55, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
300:15:55, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
277:13:42, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
262:13:10, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
241:computer science conferences
230:12:07, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
67:03:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
437:
409:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
78:AfDs for this article:
220:products out there.
55:(non-admin closure)
324:
302:
252:are expecting. --
57:
428:
411:
396:
391:
319:
314:
297:
292:
214:
213:
199:
151:
139:
121:
53:
34:
436:
435:
431:
430:
429:
427:
426:
425:
424:
418:deletion review
407:
394:
389:
317:
312:
295:
290:
237:an earlier edit
156:
147:
112:
96:
93:
76:
59:DavidLeighEllis
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
434:
432:
423:
422:
402:
401:
390:SwisterTwister
387:for analysis.
378:
368:Stephan Schulz
360:
359:
358:
357:
342:
341:
326:
325:
303:
281:
280:
279:
217:
216:
153:
92:
91:
90:
85:
77:
75:
70:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
433:
421:
419:
415:
410:
404:
403:
400:
397:
392:
386:
382:
379:
377:
373:
369:
365:
362:
361:
355:
351:
346:
345:
344:
343:
340:
337:
336:
331:
328:
327:
323:
320:
315:
309:
304:
301:
298:
293:
287:
282:
278:
274:
270:
265:
264:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
242:
238:
234:
233:
232:
231:
227:
223:
212:
208:
205:
202:
198:
194:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
162:
159:
158:Find sources:
154:
150:
146:
143:
137:
133:
129:
125:
120:
116:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
94:
89:
86:
84:
81:
74:
71:
69:
68:
64:
60:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
408:
405:
380:
363:
333:
329:
245:
218:
206:
200:
192:
185:
179:
173:
167:
157:
144:
49:
47:
31:
28:
183:free images
350:Andyjsmith
269:Andyjsmith
250:Andyjsmith
222:Andyjsmith
414:talk page
98:EasyChair
73:EasyChair
37:talk page
416:or in a
142:View log
39:or in a
189:WP refs
177:scholar
115:protect
110:history
254:Langec
161:Google
119:delete
204:JSTOR
165:books
149:Stats
136:views
128:watch
124:links
16:<
395:talk
381:Keep
372:talk
364:Keep
354:talk
335:Ruud
330:Keep
273:talk
258:talk
226:talk
197:FENS
171:news
132:logs
106:talk
102:edit
63:talk
50:keep
385:DGG
313:sst
291:sst
211:TWL
140:– (
52:.
374:)
310:.
288:.
275:)
260:)
246:do
228:)
191:)
134:|
130:|
126:|
122:|
117:|
113:|
108:|
104:|
65:)
370:(
356:)
352:(
318:✈
296:✈
271:(
256:(
224:(
215:)
207:·
201:·
193:·
186:·
180:·
174:·
168:·
163:(
155:(
152:)
145:·
138:)
100:(
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.