217:- The article is about two things, the book entitle Ecological Urbanism, and the subject - taught at multiple colleges. All of this is referenced. The book by itself has enough third party reviews to warrent inclusion. Add in the topic of it now being a college course, and I think there should be no question in the notability.
187:
Appears to be an article existing only to call attention to this new term. This is a "project" that was created in May 2010 at
Harvard. Almost all the references are from Harvard, and while the article states the book has been reviewed, the references do not really prove this. (And a link to a blog
309:
Google news search shows the term used elsewhere as well. Is the coverage for the book and the conference at
Harvard notable? Is it just local papers or do those elsewhere give it adequate coverage? Can anyone who works at Harvard or go to school there publish a book and have a conference about
294:"The phrase appeared in April 2003 at a conference at the University of Oregon, and again in 2006 in a paper by Jeffrey Hou. The phrase was used by Mohsen Mostafavi in 2007 in Intervention Architecture and in a lecture at the Canadian Centre for Architecture," ....Good luck to you.--
314:
is a free magazine and the other two places mentioned don't have
Knowledge (XXG) articles about them, so I have no idea if they are reliable or not. Getting printed in a free magazine which is mostly ads, doesn't really count towards your notability.
156:
348:
374:
117:
248:
It is very clear in the article that "Ecological urbanism is a project started at
Harvard University Graduate School of Design, including a book, conference and exhibition"--
150:
231:
The article is unclear as to what they're talking about: the book or the "project". This needs clarity. But are there other sources other than just
Harvard? —
270:
90:
85:
94:
77:
310:
it, getting mention for this in the school's paper as well as the local newspaper? Has the book been reviewed in any reliable sources?
274:
17:
171:
138:
284:
These references were made within the text. Expanding these references post-haste might be suggested as well as listing others:
459:
The references seem adequate, especially the academic courses on it, to establish it as a significant approach or subject.
266:
253:
485:
36:
132:
470:
448:
417:
389:
363:
338:
303:
257:
243:
226:
208:
59:
128:
484:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
81:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
262:
249:
178:
413:
239:
222:
204:
299:
311:
233:
198:
164:
73:
65:
428:
400:
144:
385:
359:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
409:
316:
218:
295:
189:
439:
55:
466:
381:
355:
111:
431:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
403:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
50:
461:
478:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
107:
103:
99:
163:
196:, I do not think this article deserves inclusion. —
436:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
408:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
177:
349:list of Architecture-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
488:). No further edits should be made to this page.
375:list of Environment-related deletion discussions
8:
369:
343:
373:: This debate has been included in the
347:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
192:. Until there can be reliable
1:
418:01:04, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
390:00:22, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
364:00:22, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
339:04:07, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
258:20:07, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
244:19:42, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
227:19:41, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
209:19:28, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
471:03:44, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
194:neutral, third-party sources
60:17:03, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
449:00:59, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
304:16:03, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
505:
481:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
188:does not suffice as a
275:few or no other edits
277:outside this topic.
312:Metropolis Magazine
263:Cuttingedgethinking
250:Cuttingedgethinking
74:Ecological Urbanism
66:Ecological Urbanism
44:The result was
451:
447:
420:
392:
378:
366:
352:
278:
242:
207:
496:
483:
446:
444:
437:
435:
433:
407:
405:
379:
353:
335:
332:
329:
326:
323:
320:
260:
238:
232:
203:
197:
182:
181:
167:
115:
97:
34:
504:
503:
499:
498:
497:
495:
494:
493:
492:
486:deletion review
479:
440:
438:
426:
398:
333:
330:
327:
324:
321:
318:
296:User:Warrior777
236:
201:
190:reliable source
124:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
502:
500:
491:
490:
474:
473:
453:
452:
434:
423:
422:
421:
406:
395:
394:
393:
367:
341:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
185:
184:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
501:
489:
487:
482:
476:
475:
472:
468:
464:
463:
458:
455:
454:
450:
445:
443:
432:
430:
425:
424:
419:
415:
411:
404:
402:
397:
396:
391:
387:
383:
376:
372:
368:
365:
361:
357:
350:
346:
342:
340:
337:
336:
313:
308:
307:
306:
305:
301:
297:
283:
280:
279:
276:
272:
268:
264:
259:
255:
251:
247:
246:
245:
241:
235:
230:
229:
228:
224:
220:
216:
213:
212:
211:
210:
206:
200:
195:
191:
180:
176:
173:
170:
166:
162:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
130:
127:
126:Find sources:
122:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
480:
477:
460:
456:
441:
427:
399:
370:
344:
317:
293:
281:
214:
193:
186:
174:
168:
160:
153:
147:
141:
135:
125:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
410:Ron Ritzman
273:) has made
219:Turlo Lomon
151:free images
442:Sandstein
382:• Gene93k
356:• Gene93k
429:Relisted
401:Relisted
271:contribs
234:Timneu22
199:Timneu22
118:View log
157:WP refs
145:scholar
91:protect
86:history
129:Google
95:delete
467:talk
334:Focus
172:JSTOR
133:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
48:. --
16:<
457:Keep
414:talk
386:talk
371:Note
360:talk
345:Note
300:talk
282:Keep
267:talk
254:talk
240:talk
223:talk
215:Keep
205:talk
165:FENS
139:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
46:keep
462:DGG
380:--
354:--
179:TWL
116:– (
469:)
416:)
388:)
377:.
362:)
351:.
302:)
269:•
261:—
256:)
225:)
159:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
465:(
412:(
384:(
358:(
331:m
328:a
325:e
322:r
319:D
298:(
265:(
252:(
237:·
221:(
202:·
183:)
175:·
169:·
161:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
136:·
131:(
123:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.