317:- Nothing in the article or the sources prove that he actually competed for TNA, just that he was there for one week and attacked Sandman, in 2003 TNA were throwing a lot of stuff at the wall to see what stuck, I am not even sure he actually wrestled a match for them. Even if he wrestled just one match that's hardly enough or we'd have articles on every jobber that appeared on WWF Challenge through out the 1980s and 90s. Article does not assert notability IMO.
405:
There have been many an article that have been deleted based on notability not being in the article. The article still doesn't assert notability. Plus this article has been around since May 5th, 2009 and nobody bothered to say anything about it. For going on a year, it was just a list of titles he
200:
This article doesn't meet the guidelines of professional wrestling related biographies. It lacks several points such as references, a career section, an "in wrestling" section, and the championships need more information such as how many times he won the title and who with for Tag Team
Championships.
295:
I still don't see how he is notable. The career section is lacking and doesn't assert notability. It doesn't talk about his training or anything like that. It just says he worked for TNA, then was in a match in which lost thus forcing to retire, and finally wrestled one last match under his real
439:
for his feud with The
Sandman in TNA (which included two ppv matches), but that combined with his other titles and mentions in numerous reliable sources are enough to keep the article around. As for articles being deleted because notability isn't listed in the article...I think you misunderstand.
384:
per GaryColemanFan. It is probably also worth pointing out that we don't delete articles because they are incomplete or badly written or missing certain section headers. We also don't discount indicators of notability just because they are not (yet) in the article.
406:
won. It can't believe it was left in that horrible state. Most articles about someone not notable would have been put up for deletion and deleted by now. Why make an exception for this one? Doesn't make sense to me. Even people like
169:
440:
Articles are deleted because the subject isn't notable, no matter if the article is great or poor. Knowledge (XXG) is a work in progress, and articles can be improved. However, when there are no sources
278:- After expansion, this article now meets WP:ATHLETE, as he has competed at the top of his profession (he was a regular wrestler for TNA Wrestling) and has been covered in multiple reliable sources.
355:
If that is the case, it's pretty sad that it can't even be incorporated into the article. That is saying something. Plus one match and feud in TNA doesn't assert notability.
476:
That is totally untrue. I have come across many articles that are not sourced and still around. Some of the
Japanese wrestler articles are not sourced and are still around.
124:
228:
254:
163:
569:
Mr. CC, I'm not seeing your logic. You argue that the poor state of an article is reason to delete, because other poorly written articles haven't been deleted? —
498:
I suggest that you either strike or refactor the first sentence of your "comment" forthwith. Even if you were right which you were not, calling other editors
129:
97:
92:
482:
101:
17:
296:
name with the fans chanting "you're a legend" after he won. It doesn't mention about any of the promotions he was a big part of.
84:
528:
184:
151:
596:
36:
416:
361:
302:
210:
145:
595:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
343:
283:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
577:
551:
523:
510:
489:
464:
423:
393:
368:
347:
330:
309:
287:
269:
243:
217:
141:
66:
191:
88:
436:
381:
339:
279:
177:
544:
457:
444:(which is different that them being present in the article), then it is deleted as non-notable.
265:
239:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
157:
574:
325:
499:
410:
aka Colin Delany in WWE/ECW was put up for deletion and he is more notable then this guy.
521:
508:
391:
80:
72:
202:
532:
445:
338:- The first SLAM! Wrestling reference states that he defeated Norman Smiley in TNA.
261:
235:
118:
570:
407:
318:
516:
503:
386:
201:
Plus he is not notable enough to warrant an article at this time.
589:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
114:
110:
106:
176:
190:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
599:). No further edits should be made to this page.
229:list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions
255:list of Athletes-related deletion discussions
8:
249:
223:
253:: This debate has been included in the
227:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
529:Knowledge (XXG):Other stuff exists
24:
500:bold faced liars is unacceptable
1:
616:
578:16:46, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
552:03:18, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
524:15:53, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
511:15:08, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
490:14:33, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
465:03:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
435:, he barely seems to pass
424:00:54, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
394:17:47, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
369:17:49, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
348:16:50, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
331:07:20, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
310:05:32, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
288:04:27, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
270:01:07, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
244:01:07, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
218:16:55, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
67:23:02, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
592:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
272:
258:
246:
232:
607:
594:
549:
543:
537:
519:
506:
488:
485:
480:
462:
456:
450:
422:
419:
414:
389:
367:
364:
359:
328:
322:
308:
305:
300:
259:
233:
216:
213:
208:
195:
194:
180:
132:
122:
104:
64:
34:
615:
614:
610:
609:
608:
606:
605:
604:
603:
597:deletion review
590:
545:
539:
533:
517:
504:
487:
484:I didn't do it!
483:
478:
477:
458:
452:
446:
421:
418:I didn't do it!
417:
412:
411:
387:
366:
363:I didn't do it!
362:
357:
356:
326:
320:
307:
304:I didn't do it!
303:
298:
297:
215:
212:I didn't do it!
211:
206:
205:
137:
128:
95:
81:Edward Chastain
79:
76:
73:Edward Chastain
60:
56:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
613:
611:
602:
601:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
526:
513:
493:
492:
481:
468:
467:
429:
428:
427:
426:
415:
397:
396:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
360:
340:GaryColemanFan
312:
301:
290:
280:GaryColemanFan
273:
247:
209:
198:
197:
134:
130:AfD statistics
75:
70:
58:
54:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
612:
600:
598:
593:
587:
586:
579:
576:
572:
568:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
553:
550:
548:
542:
538:
536:
530:
527:
525:
522:
520:
514:
512:
509:
507:
501:
497:
496:
495:
494:
491:
486:
475:
472:
471:
470:
469:
466:
463:
461:
455:
451:
449:
443:
438:
434:
431:
430:
425:
420:
409:
404:
401:
400:
399:
398:
395:
392:
390:
383:
379:
376:
370:
365:
354:
351:
350:
349:
345:
341:
337:
334:
333:
332:
329:
324:
323:
316:
313:
311:
306:
294:
291:
289:
285:
281:
277:
274:
271:
267:
263:
256:
252:
248:
245:
241:
237:
230:
226:
222:
221:
220:
219:
214:
204:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
126:
120:
116:
112:
108:
103:
99:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:
74:
71:
69:
68:
65:
63:
62:
61:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
591:
588:
566:
546:
540:
534:
473:
459:
453:
447:
441:
432:
402:
377:
352:
335:
319:
314:
292:
275:
250:
224:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
53:
52:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
515:Thank you.
408:Colin Olsen
380:as meeting
164:free images
437:WP:ATHLETE
382:WP:ATHLETE
57:rbitrarily
442:available
433:Weak keep
262:• Gene93k
236:• Gene93k
567:Comment.
479:Mr. C.C.
413:Mr. C.C.
358:Mr. C.C.
299:Mr. C.C.
207:Mr. C.C.
125:View log
474:Comment
403:Comment
353:Comment
336:Comment
293:Comment
170:WP refs
158:scholar
98:protect
93:history
571:Gwalla
315:Delete
142:Google
102:delete
535:Nikki
518:Nancy
505:Nancy
448:Nikki
388:Nancy
185:JSTOR
146:books
119:views
111:watch
107:links
16:<
575:Talk
378:Keep
344:talk
327:-DK
321:MPJ
284:talk
276:Keep
266:talk
251:Note
240:talk
225:Note
203:WP:N
178:FENS
152:news
115:logs
89:talk
85:edit
46:keep
547:311
460:311
260:--
234:--
192:TWL
127:•
123:– (
573:|
531:.
502:.
346:)
286:)
268:)
257:.
242:)
231:.
172:)
117:|
113:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
48:.
541:♥
454:♥
342:(
282:(
264:(
238:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
121:)
83:(
59:0
55:A
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.