440:: There is some misunderstanding of the difference between plagiarism and copyright infringement. While plagiarism is claiming attribution for a work you did not create, or using someone else’s work without proper attribution, copyright infringement is using someone else’s work without obtaining their permission. Therefore, the fact that the article has a reference link to the source of information (for example his CV or personal page) does not mean that copyright is not infringed. On top of that my declaring the photo as my own work does not mean I have the ownership right over the photo. The photo belongs to Ed. Zajac and I I was not aware of the problem and wrongly provided it to Knowledge (XXG) without permission. Therefore, I would like to acknowledge the copyright infringement and unauthorized use of the photo, and take correction actions.
338:: Thank you for having considered my request. As the person who created the article, I request deletion of this page for three resons. First, due to my fault, the information that Edward Zajac is a Chair Professor is incorrect, and he does not hold any chair appointment. Given the huge number of academic at Northwestern, he may not pass the nobility criteria. Second, the wikipedia article contains information that I took from his personal website, which restricts any reuse of information on any other websites, and wrong information (e.g. influenced person). Third and most important, his person picture was stolen from his personal laptop as part of information theft and privacy breach. Therefore, I would like to ask for permission to delete Edward Zajac's article. Thank you for your time and consideration
393:, I think you have misunderstood what AfD is for and how things work around here in general. When you created and made any subsequent edits to the article, you agreed to irrevocably release your contributions to the Knowledge (XXG) community and anybody else who wants to use it (have a look at the text right above the "Save changes" button on any page). You don't own the article, so you can't simply ask for it to be deleted because you now regret writing it. AfD is a process where the community discusses whether or not an article should be deleted, based mainly on whether or not its subject meets our criteria for inclusion – see the
370:: You uploaded this photo to Knowledge (XXG) yourself describing the source as "Own work", that is, that you took the photo yourself. If you lied in specifying that the photo was your "Own work", you should unlink the photo from the article and tag the photo file for deletion. But that's not a good reason to delete the article.
52:
which is also then a Speedy Keep, considering not only is the user simply stating some apparent "access information violations", but there is no other countercomments suggesting why and how we should not actually consider the WP:PROF notability, which he certainly satisfies therefore Keep, with no
513:) he was given the named title two years before being promoted to full professor, rather than (as is more commonly the case and the criterion expects) it being a marker of distinction at a level beyond a normal full professor. Nevertheless,
317:, would you explain your rationale more fully? Where is the privacy violation, and what personal information page was accessed improperly? And how should those influence our opinion as to whether Zajac passes our
176:
235:
276:
129:
415:
from a website, so long as you properly reference where you got it from, is standard practice and how all articles are written. Could you please clarify which is the case? Regarding
301:. He's the James F. Beré Chair Professor of Management and Organizations, and someone who holds a named chair appointment at a major institution of higher education and research is
477:
551:
170:
472:. There's no confusion on my part, at least. Infringing the copyright of text consists of copying or closely paraphrasing it. There is simply not enough prose text in
407:. I don't understand why you would now claim this is false. Your second two reasons are also troubling. If you copied text verbatim from Zajac's website
136:
505:. All of the information in the article appears to be non-private, and (the photo excepted) too brief and factual to be a copyvio. The case for
366:
at
Northwestern says: James F. Bere Professor of Management & Organizations. So he does hold a named chair appointment. Regarding the photo
102:
97:
484:
should be deleted apart from the fact that you (or Zajac?) want it to be. What do you mean when you say it is a violation of privacy?
106:
17:
309:
definitely sounds like a major institution. We can delete articles here about notable topics, but basically only if the article is
476:
to constitute a copyright violation. If you did not, in fact, have permission to release the photo then yes it should be deleted –
89:
455:
353:
222:
573:. Holds a named chair at a major institution. We are here to debate notability of the subject, not quality of the article. --
191:
158:
321:, or how should those influence our opinion as to whether the article's so bad that we need to trash it and start over?
534:
Zajac passes the notability guidelines and the nominator hasn't presented a clear rationale for this article's deletion.
306:
250:
601:
40:
416:
152:
522:
510:
66:
207:
This page is deleted as a result of privacy violation and of unauthorized access to personal information page
582:
562:
542:
526:
493:
459:
432:
379:
357:
330:
292:
255:
226:
148:
71:
443:
341:
268:
210:
400:
364:
597:
36:
302:
272:
198:
578:
284:
93:
467:
447:
408:
390:
345:
314:
214:
559:
539:
518:
451:
349:
218:
184:
54:
394:
489:
428:
326:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
596:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
506:
404:
313:, and I see no real issues with this stub article — in particular, nothing privacy-related.
164:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
244:
318:
310:
574:
473:
375:
280:
85:
77:
514:
419:, you uploaded it yourself last May and claimed it was your own work, so are you saying
555:
535:
367:
485:
437:
424:
335:
322:
123:
239:
371:
511:
http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/faculty/directory/zajac_edward.aspx#vita
411:
and this will need to be identified and removed. However, simply taking
590:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
509:
is a little weaker than it might normally be, as (according to
236:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
277:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Log/2016 September 27
480:. However, you have not advanced a valid reason that the
399:
As for your three reasons above – Northwestern's website
119:
115:
111:
183:
409:
then you released copyrighted text without permission
363:
What are you taking about?? His official profile page
403:that Zajac holds a named chair which satisfies our
197:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
604:). No further edits should be made to this page.
552:list of Illinois-related deletion discussions
8:
550:Note: This debate has been included in the
234:Note: This debate has been included in the
53:outstanding suggestions of Deletion (NAC).
549:
441:
339:
233:
208:
558:, is the complaint department really on
538:, is the complaint department really on
517:also shows a clear pass of WP:PROF#C1. —
405:criteria for the inclusion of academics
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
583:14:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
563:23:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
543:22:23, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
527:20:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
494:17:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
460:16:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
433:12:14, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
380:11:55, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
358:11:10, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
331:10:21, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
293:07:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
256:06:55, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
227:22:46, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
1:
417:File:Ed_Zajac_profile_pic.jpg
368:File:Ed Zajac profile pic.jpg
275:). I have transcluded it to
307:Kellogg School of Management
423:stole it (or his laptop)??
267:This AfD was not correctly
72:04:25, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
621:
515:his Google scholar profile
593:Please do not modify it.
478:I've nominated it at FfD
32:Please do not modify it.
319:inclusion criteria
303:considered notable
265:Automated comment:
565:
462:
446:comment added by
360:
344:comment added by
295:
291:
258:
254:
229:
213:comment added by
612:
595:
471:
287:
286:Talk to my owner
282:
263:
242:
202:
201:
187:
139:
127:
109:
69:
64:
48:The result was
34:
620:
619:
615:
614:
613:
611:
610:
609:
608:
602:deletion review
591:
474:Edward J. Zajac
465:
395:deletion policy
290:
285:
144:
135:
100:
86:Edward J. Zajac
84:
81:
78:Edward J. Zajac
67:
55:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
618:
616:
607:
606:
586:
585:
567:
566:
546:
545:
529:
519:David Eppstein
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
401:clearly states
398:
384:
383:
382:
333:
296:
283:
260:
259:
205:
204:
141:
80:
75:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
617:
605:
603:
599:
594:
588:
587:
584:
580:
576:
572:
569:
568:
564:
561:
557:
553:
548:
547:
544:
541:
537:
533:
530:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
501:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
469:
464:
463:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
439:
436:
435:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
396:
392:
388:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
362:
361:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
337:
334:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
297:
294:
288:
281:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
261:
257:
252:
249:
246:
241:
237:
232:
231:
230:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
200:
196:
193:
190:
186:
182:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
150:
147:
146:Find sources:
142:
138:
134:
131:
125:
121:
117:
113:
108:
104:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
82:
79:
76:
74:
73:
70:
65:
62:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
592:
589:
570:
531:
502:
481:
442:— Preceding
420:
412:
386:
340:— Preceding
298:
271:to the log (
264:
247:
209:— Preceding
206:
194:
188:
180:
173:
167:
161:
155:
145:
132:
60:
56:
49:
47:
31:
28:
532:Speedy keep
413:information
387:Speedy keep
269:transcluded
171:free images
575:Necrothesp
556:...William
536:...William
507:WP:PROF#C5
311:really bad
598:talk page
560:the roof?
540:the roof?
468:ThomasNDT
448:ThomasNDT
391:ThomasNDT
346:ThomasNDT
315:ThomasNDT
215:ThomasNDT
50:SNOW Keep
37:talk page
600:or in a
456:contribs
444:unsigned
354:contribs
342:unsigned
223:contribs
211:unsigned
130:View log
39:or in a
486:Joe Roe
482:article
438:Joe Roe
425:Joe Roe
336:Nyttend
323:Nyttend
305:. The
289::Online
177:WP refs
165:scholar
103:protect
98:history
273:step 3
240:JJMC89
149:Google
107:delete
63:wister
59:wister
372:Nsk92
192:JSTOR
153:books
137:Stats
124:views
116:watch
112:links
16:<
579:talk
571:Keep
523:talk
503:Keep
490:talk
452:talk
429:talk
376:talk
350:talk
327:talk
299:Keep
279:. —
238:. —
219:talk
185:FENS
159:news
120:logs
94:talk
90:edit
68:talk
421:you
199:TWL
128:– (
581:)
554:.
525:)
492:)
458:)
454:•
431:)
389:.
378:)
356:)
352:•
329:)
225:)
221:•
179:)
122:|
118:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
577:(
521:(
488:(
470::
466:@
450:(
427:(
397:.
374:(
348:(
325:(
253:)
251:C
248:·
245:T
243:(
217:(
203:)
195:·
189:·
181:·
174:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
151:(
143:(
140:)
133:·
126:)
88:(
61:T
57:S
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.