181:
notable little app. I have been using it for years. There are plenty of reviews on the web and on
Magazine paper. Look for them and fix the page accordingly if you must. Editors' laziness to link reviews does not warrant a deletion. Instead of wasting peoples' time in this nomination try fixing the
152:
shows a ton of download sites, but no reviews, or magazine articles, or anything like tha requiredt. Download sites don't establish notability because thousands of downloads are hosted on various sites. The other AFD only listed on review
282:
The first two links are just download centers. As I argued in the nom, those don't really establish notability. The third looks incredibly trivial, three paragraphs on a site that doesn't look like significant media coverage.
245:"Just Great Software, Inc. currently offers two editions of EditPad: Lite, which is freeware for non-commercial usage only; and Pro, a shareware product that costs 49.95 USD after a 30-day evaluation period".
83:
78:
243:
sounds like another promotion article. Significant amount of edits were done by anon users. I've read thousands of PC magazine articles, and I've never heard of this one.
224:
138:
297:
This nomination is obvious forum-shopping. Relisting is less than 3 weeks after previous AfD, and no notification have been given to authors involved in the article.
73:
17:
306:
I was not aware that there was a time limit to renominating it. I am not renominating it on the exact same grounds. It clearly
314:
301:
287:
277:
251:
234:
214:
195:
186:
173:
160:
56:
331:
36:
111:
106:
115:
330:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
98:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
261:
170:
102:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
94:
62:
248:
210:
311:
284:
273:, ie. I don't know what editorial processes exists, which is why this is not a keep vote.
192:
157:
270:
267:
150:
146:
183:
132:
298:
274:
264:
231:
206:
50:
154:
149:: no multiple, third-party, non-trivial sources. A cursory Scroogle search
269:. 3 is more than one. :) I have no idea about if these sources passes
310:
advertising, for instance, but I definitely don't think it's notable.
191:
The onus is on those who want to keep it to provide those sources.
324:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
128:
124:
120:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
334:). No further edits should be made to this page.
84:Articles for deletion/EditPad (3rd nomination)
79:Articles for deletion/EditPad (2nd nomination)
205:due to lack of third-party reliable sources.
8:
156:which does not meet the multiple threshold.
223:: This debate has been included in the
71:
260:other reviews listed on previous AfD;
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
69:
225:list of Software-related deletions
24:
1:
74:Articles for deletion/EditPad
351:
315:22:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
302:14:28, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
288:22:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
278:14:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
252:13:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
57:03:57, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
327:Please do not modify it.
235:23:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
215:16:49, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
196:20:11, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
187:15:07, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
174:02:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
161:01:50, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
68:AfDs for this article:
247:Eh hem. 49.95, eh? (
237:
228:
342:
329:
229:
219:
136:
118:
53:
34:
350:
349:
345:
344:
343:
341:
340:
339:
338:
332:deletion review
325:
232:John Vandenberg
109:
93:
90:
88:
66:
51:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
348:
346:
337:
336:
320:
319:
318:
317:
292:
291:
290:
255:
238:
217:
200:
199:
198:
176:
143:
142:
89:
87:
86:
81:
76:
70:
67:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
347:
335:
333:
328:
322:
321:
316:
313:
309:
305:
304:
303:
300:
296:
293:
289:
286:
281:
280:
279:
276:
272:
268:
265:
262:
259:
256:
253:
250:
246:
242:
239:
236:
233:
226:
222:
218:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
197:
194:
190:
189:
188:
185:
180:
177:
175:
172:
168:
165:
164:
163:
162:
159:
155:
151:
148:
140:
134:
130:
126:
122:
117:
113:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
91:
85:
82:
80:
77:
75:
72:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
326:
323:
307:
294:
257:
244:
240:
220:
202:
178:
166:
144:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
249:Wikimachine
312:hbdragon88
285:hbdragon88
193:hbdragon88
171:Rackabello
158:hbdragon88
169:per nom
139:View log
258:comment
184:LexCorp
182:page.--
112:protect
107:history
95:EditPad
63:EditPad
299:Taemyr
275:Taemyr
266:, and
241:Delete
207:Stifle
203:Delete
167:Delete
145:Fails
116:delete
52:Kurykh
46:delete
308:isn't
271:WP:RS
133:views
125:watch
121:links
16:<
295:Keep
221:Note
211:talk
179:Keep
147:WP:N
129:logs
103:talk
99:edit
263:,
230:--
227:.
137:– (
48:. —
213:)
131:|
127:|
123:|
119:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
254:)
209:(
141:)
135:)
97:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.