Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Edith Cody-Rice - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

240:. I previously PRODDED then reverted as article had only just been restored from previous deletion (per page logs). Article still fails to establish notability. Can not find indepth sources, small coverage in Who's Who doesn't do it for me per NOT#DIRECTORY, notable husband, but notability is not inherited.-- 162: 314:. There are a maybe 15 news articles archived over the last two decades and a number of passing references in other publications. This falls far short of the "significant coverage" requirement. 278: 117: 256:
Keep - if she's in Canadian Who's Who and considered sufficient of an authority to appear before Canadian Parliamentary Committees on a regular basis, what's the point of deleting?
156: 122: 90: 85: 94: 17: 77: 177: 144: 338: 36: 319: 290: 138: 337:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
312:"she has not received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" 323: 294: 265: 251: 231: 205: 134: 59: 81: 315: 286: 184: 193:
Non-notable lawyer, being an inhouse counsel is not notable and Who's who doesn't show notability per
73: 65: 170: 282: 214: 227: 261: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
150: 307: 194: 55: 223: 257: 199: 111: 50: 217:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
331:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
107: 103: 99: 279:
WP essay on agruments to avoid in deletion discussions
169: 222:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 183: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 341:). No further edits should be made to this page. 306:. Does not meet the notability guidelines of 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 277:is not evidence of notability. The 285:-type arguments against deletion. 24: 1: 324:00:40, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 295:00:35, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 266:13:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 252:02:02, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 232:01:10, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 60:04:27, 13 February 2010 (UTC) 206:14:28, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 358: 334:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 44:The result was 250: 234: 349: 336: 316:Wikipeterproject 287:Wikipeterproject 283:what's the point 281:advises against 247: 241: 221: 219: 202: 188: 187: 173: 125: 115: 97: 34: 357: 356: 352: 351: 350: 348: 347: 346: 345: 339:deletion review 332: 245: 212: 200: 130: 121: 88: 74:Edith Cody-Rice 72: 69: 66:Edith Cody-Rice 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 355: 353: 344: 343: 327: 326: 300: 299: 298: 297: 254: 235: 220: 209: 191: 190: 127: 123:AfD statistics 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 354: 342: 340: 335: 329: 328: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 302: 301: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 269: 268: 267: 263: 259: 255: 253: 249: 248: 239: 236: 233: 229: 225: 218: 216: 211: 210: 208: 207: 204: 203: 196: 186: 182: 179: 176: 172: 168: 164: 161: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 136: 133: 132:Find sources: 128: 124: 119: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 61: 57: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 333: 330: 311: 303: 274: 273:: Entry in 270: 243: 242: 237: 213: 198: 192: 180: 174: 166: 159: 153: 147: 141: 131: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 157:free images 271:(Response) 275:Who's Who 310:in that 224:Tim Song 215:Relisted 118:View log 258:Opbeith 201:MBisanz 163:WP refs 151:scholar 91:protect 86:history 308:WP;BIO 304:Delete 246:Oranje 238:Delete 195:WP:BIO 135:Google 95:delete 46:delete 178:JSTOR 139:books 112:views 104:watch 100:links 16:< 320:talk 291:talk 262:talk 244:Club 228:talk 171:FENS 145:news 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 56:talk 51:Cirt 185:TWL 120:• 116:– ( 322:) 293:) 264:) 230:) 197:. 165:) 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 58:) 48:. 318:( 289:( 260:( 226:( 189:) 181:· 175:· 167:· 160:· 154:· 148:· 142:· 137:( 129:( 126:) 114:) 76:( 54:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Cirt
talk
04:27, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Edith Cody-Rice
Edith Cody-Rice
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
AfD statistics
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:BIO
MBisanz
14:28, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.