273:(as creator of DAB page). These are two well defined and clearly distinct meanings of this term, both of which are notable in different spheres of natural science and discussed in different wikipedia articles. Without this DAB page, it's confusing for readers searching for information on one of them when they are redirected to an article that mentions the other. There used to be a stub article on Electrical elastance that was then moved to Elastance, and then merged into Capacitance. Much of the content was lost in the merger. I would not be opposed to recreating that stub at
443:("Electrical and Electronics Reference Manual for the Electrical and Computer PE Exam" Page 16-11) but I'm not well-versed in this field so I can't be sure if that's the best citation. I'd be fine with restoring the stub as long as there's a link at the top that says "if you were looking for the inverse of compliance in physiology see
440:
441:
https://books.google.com/books?id=rfHWHeU0jfsC&pg=SA16-PA11&lpg=SA16-PA11&dq=elastance+electronics&source=bl&ots=OPlqwhMvkB&sig=k8vO2u1EDxQ-IZLDOylfDucooIk&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjNtaK1hfDQAhXHxlQKHXGMCT8Q6AEIOjAG#v=onepage&q=elastance%20electronics&f=false
366:
reasonably well. The physiology meaning is merely an application of the term in mechanics. The electrical meaning comes through analogy with mechanical systems, hence the name. Many other quantities in mechanics and electrics share the same name because they share the same
277:
and possibly creating a new stub about the meaning in physiology, if that would fix the issue raised by the OP. However, this DAB is clearly necessary to avoid reader confusion, and quickly direct users to the information they are looking for.
493:
who coined terms for many of the properties occuring in electromagnetic analysis (and was much criticised for it—but they nearly all stuck so he gets the last laugh). And, aha, having made that guess, I immediately find
174:
226:
489:
has a table showing the analogy between mechanical and electrical elastance (not very clearly it has to be said). It would be nice to know who invented the term. My guess would be
127:
439:
The old stub was unreferenced. Does anyone with an electronics background have a source we can include for it if we're going to re-create it? A cursory Google Search reveals this
168:
375:, and sometimes the other way round as here. Knowledge (XXG) could do a much better job of highlighting this. Deleting this article would be a step backwards.
253:. Maybe a third entry could be added for the general concept in mechanics, but I can't seem to find an article where it's covered (there's nothing at
134:
17:
470:
100:
95:
189:
104:
570:
40:
234:
156:
87:
398:, saying "merging". This makes for a rather poor dab page. The physiology term can be linked to in a hatnote. —
394:
and roll back per
Spinningspark. This was a promising stub until another editor came along and redirected it to
527:
452:
283:
447:").. This would be done similarly to the little italic text currently at the top of compliance (physiology) --
473:
and there may be more information in the references there. Although that article does not currently mention
416:
Yes, the so called merge was no more than adding a dicdef. All the real encyclopaedic information was lost.
508:
444:
422:
381:
345:
478:
250:
150:
230:
566:
469:
and explains the connection with mechanical compliance. The bigger picture for this relationship is in
368:
36:
146:
485:
gives some idea why the concept is useful in network analysis through an example of Cauer using it.
372:
274:
212:
551:
531:
513:
456:
427:
407:
386:
350:
326:
287:
265:
238:
218:
69:
523:
448:
279:
182:
304:
503:
417:
403:
376:
340:
196:
495:
462:
499:
486:
262:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
565:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
59:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
490:
207:
362:
to this being an article. The two meanings are not entirely unconnected and the article
317:
162:
91:
482:
399:
121:
395:
299:
so that a sensible bluelink can go there from the dab page, rather than just to
296:
65:
254:
545:
308:
258:
83:
75:
465:
verifies most of the information in the old article. It mentions the unit
371:
sometimes mechanics borrowing from electrical science, as in the case of
300:
559:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
543:- This can be rolled back to a version that is acceptable. --
339:
with the edit summary "balderdash". I have just restored it.
477:, it could do, and both articles should be cross-linked.
363:
336:
117:
113:
109:
208:
181:
295:: but add a definition of the electronics version to
227:
52:. There is general consensus for this article to be
195:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
573:). No further edits should be made to this page.
461:That source is great for the basic definition.
205:useless dab-page, as it has no proper targets
8:
303:. I've tweaked the dab page to make it more
225:Note: This debate has been included in the
224:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
249:. Both entries comfortably pass
56:to when the article was a stub.
471:mechanical-electrical analogies
1:
552:00:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
532:17:27, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
514:15:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
498:to back that up, and here is
457:01:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
428:00:24, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
408:23:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
387:15:52, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
351:15:33, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
335:It used to have one, but was
327:10:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
288:07:15, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
266:02:07, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
239:01:27, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
219:22:32, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
70:01:10, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
590:
562:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
445:compliance (physiology)
369:constitutive relation
373:mechanical impedance
364:used to explain this
307:-compliant for now.
275:Electrical elastance
54:kept and rolled back
520:Keep and roll back
502:talking about it.
360:Keep and roll back
518:Nice! Thank you!
500:Heaviside himself
241:
231:Shawn in Montreal
63:
60:non-admin closure
581:
564:
548:
491:Oliver Heaviside
324:
315:
217:
210:
200:
199:
185:
137:
125:
107:
57:
34:
589:
588:
584:
583:
582:
580:
579:
578:
577:
571:deletion review
560:
546:
318:
309:
206:
142:
133:
98:
82:
79:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
587:
585:
576:
575:
555:
554:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
524:HighFlyingFish
449:HighFlyingFish
433:
432:
431:
430:
411:
410:
389:
356:
355:
354:
353:
330:
329:
290:
280:HighFlyingFish
268:
263:Uanfala (talk)
243:
242:
203:
202:
139:
78:
73:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
586:
574:
572:
568:
563:
557:
556:
553:
550:
549:
542:
539:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
516:
515:
512:
511:
507:
506:
501:
497:
492:
488:
484:
483:Wilhelm Cauer
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
459:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
435:
434:
429:
426:
425:
421:
420:
415:
414:
413:
412:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
390:
388:
385:
384:
380:
379:
374:
370:
365:
361:
358:
357:
352:
349:
348:
344:
343:
338:
334:
333:
332:
331:
328:
325:
323:
322:
316:
314:
313:
306:
302:
298:
294:
291:
289:
285:
281:
276:
272:
269:
267:
264:
260:
256:
252:
251:WP:DABMENTION
248:
245:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
215:
211:
198:
194:
191:
188:
184:
180:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:Find sources:
140:
136:
132:
129:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
77:
74:
72:
71:
68:
67:
61:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
561:
558:
544:
540:
519:
509:
504:
474:
466:
436:
423:
418:
391:
382:
377:
359:
346:
341:
320:
319:
311:
310:
292:
270:
246:
213:
204:
192:
186:
178:
171:
165:
159:
153:
143:
130:
64:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
487:This source
396:Capacitance
297:Capacitance
169:free images
479:This paper
255:Elasticity
209:The Banner
567:talk page
475:elastance
463:This book
305:WP:MOSDAB
259:Stiffness
84:Elastance
76:Elastance
37:talk page
569:or in a
522:then. --
505:Spinning
419:Spinning
400:Gorthian
378:Spinning
342:Spinning
128:View log
39:or in a
437:Comment
337:removed
175:WP refs
163:scholar
101:protect
96:history
147:Google
105:delete
66:st170e
510:Spark
467:daraf
424:Spark
383:Spark
347:Spark
301:daraf
261:). –
190:JSTOR
151:books
135:Stats
122:views
114:watch
110:links
16:<
547:Dane
541:Keep
528:talk
496:this
453:talk
404:talk
392:Keep
293:Keep
284:talk
271:Keep
247:Keep
235:talk
214:talk
183:FENS
157:news
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
50:keep
481:on
312:Pam
257:or
197:TWL
126:– (
530:)
455:)
406:)
286:)
278:--
237:)
229:.
177:)
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
526:(
451:(
402:(
321:D
282:(
233:(
201:)
193:·
187:·
179:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
149:(
141:(
138:)
131:·
124:)
86:(
62:)
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.