249:. This seems to mostly be an epithet used to describe positions that the writer is arguing against. It is a fairly well known term, though, and as such this minimal stub has possibility for expansion. -
263:
For the record, I'd gladly use this term to describe my position: It seems to fit better and carry less baggage than the alternatives "agnosticism" (suggesting lack of religion) and "skepticism" (
148:
48:
to do anything (default to Keep). No consensus either to Keep or Merge, or if Merged, what the target should be. This is best taken to the talkpage for the time being.
118:
85:
80:
89:
72:
17:
76:
299:
276:
258:
241:
216:
195:
159:
138:
54:
317:
36:
155:
316:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
287:
212:
68:
60:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
134:
295:
167:. Crapload of print sources with chapters discussing the subject. Saying that this should be merged to
151:
130:
49:
291:
208:
272:
193:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
254:
176:
237:
268:
188:
204:
106:
250:
233:
172:
229:
225:
184:
180:
168:
126:
267:
abused). But I honestly don't know (hah!) if the term is notable. —
125:
Unnotable dictionary definition that at best deserves a mention in
310:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
113:
102:
98:
94:
288:
Philosophical skepticism#Epistemology and skepticism
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
320:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
228:. Mention might fit best in the section
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
286:We already have a section on this:
24:
1:
230:Self-consistency and paradox
337:
313:Please do not modify it.
300:02:08, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
69:Epistemological nihilism
61:Epistemological nihilism
55:18:24, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
277:15:53, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
259:14:44, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
242:11:18, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
217:11:03, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
196:09:37, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
160:07:29, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
139:07:19, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
183:should be merged to
175:should be merged to
44:The result was
328:
315:
177:Natural sciences
152:Peregrine Fisher
147:- It's notable.
129:. Failed Prod.
116:
110:
92:
34:
336:
335:
331:
330:
329:
327:
326:
325:
324:
318:deletion review
311:
251:Smerdis of Tlön
171:is like saying
112:
83:
67:
64:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
334:
332:
323:
322:
305:
303:
302:
281:
280:
279:
244:
219:
209:Colonel Warden
198:
162:
123:
122:
63:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
333:
321:
319:
314:
308:
307:
306:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
261:
260:
256:
252:
248:
245:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
220:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
199:
197:
194:
192:
191:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
161:
157:
153:
149:
146:
143:
142:
141:
140:
136:
132:
128:
120:
115:
108:
104:
100:
96:
91:
87:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
65:
62:
59:
57:
56:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
312:
309:
304:
283:
269:the Sidhekin
264:
246:
221:
205:Epistemology
200:
189:
164:
144:
131:Collectonian
124:
50:
46:No consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
179:, or that
51:Black Kite
292:S.dedalus
247:Weak keep
173:Chemistry
226:Nihilism
190:Celarnor
185:Religion
181:Buddhism
169:Nihilism
127:nihilism
119:View log
86:protect
81:history
284:Merge.
114:delete
90:delete
222:Merge
201:Merge
117:) – (
107:views
99:watch
95:links
16:<
296:talk
273:talk
255:talk
238:talk
234:Deor
213:talk
165:Keep
156:talk
145:Keep
135:talk
103:logs
77:talk
73:edit
224:to
203:to
187:.
298:)
290:--
275:)
265:so
257:)
240:)
232:.
215:)
207:.
158:)
150:-
137:)
105:|
101:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
79:|
75:|
294:(
271:(
253:(
236:(
211:(
154:(
133:(
121:)
111:(
109:)
71:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.