312:
Um, there's no such thing as bit rot; an old last edit date doesn't magically make the project irrelevant. The very fact that that there are several clones (I just added a bunch more examples to the article) lends credence to its notability. (unrelated grammar nazi point well taken)
297:
The example listed above has not been touched in 5 years. Clearly no one has a use for this. Existence does not make something notable. Also, "it's" is a contraction for "it is". Please learn and use proper
English, since this is the English Knowledge (XXG).
232:
All three programs written in Erlang do not constitute notability. There are many small, specialized programming languages with more known projects that are not considered notable enough to be on
Knowledge (XXG).
252:- This is preposterous. It's a very popular example of a language that does distributed computing and concurrency Right (tm). It's concurrency model has been cloned as libraries in many other languages. --
338:- People familiar with distributed systems and fault tolerant systems know and use Erlang. Fikusfail is only showing ignorance. Scala is an Erlang clone made to make Java programmers feel better.
127:
94:
89:
98:
81:
184:- Notable subject. 173.64.118.131 has been pasting unofficial notes of deletion ... inserting manual entries into deletion logs ... I.E., wasting our time.
201:- Erlang is not notable enough to be warranted its own page. Perhaps we could consider adding it to a page on lesser-known languages of its' class?
375:
85:
17:
409:
383:
361:
357:
322:
307:
292:
275:
261:
242:
227:
210:
193:
176:
161:
143:
63:
77:
69:
424:
36:
283:. Google for "erlang-style concurrency" and observe the results; its model is clearly notable and well-discussed. --
423:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
379:
189:
371:
345:
341:
I would recommend actually finding some sources rather than making opinionated claims like the one above.
173:
318:
288:
257:
353:
303:
271:
266:
Prove that its concurrency model has been cloned. I do not see any references to this on the page.
238:
206:
139:
223:
185:
58:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
170:
397:
405:
314:
284:
253:
349:
299:
267:
234:
202:
157:
135:
219:
53:
115:
401:
153:
280:
396:. Highly notable programming language. Nominator appears to be a
417:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
368:
I would recommend doing something constructive with your time
122:
111:
107:
103:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
427:). No further edits should be made to this page.
152:- Well referenced article on a notable subject.
218:Notability is well-established in the article.
8:
48:(non-administrator closure), with a wet
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
134:The article lacks notability.
1:
78:Erlang (programming language)
70:Erlang (programming language)
410:06:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
384:06:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
362:05:58, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
323:06:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
308:06:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
293:05:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
276:05:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
262:05:22, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
243:04:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
228:04:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
211:04:44, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
194:04:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
177:04:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
162:04:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
144:04:35, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
64:07:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
444:
420:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
46:speedy, obvious keep
52:to the nominator.
374:comment added by
365:
348:comment added by
435:
422:
386:
364:
342:
125:
119:
101:
44:The result was
34:
443:
442:
438:
437:
436:
434:
433:
432:
431:
425:deletion review
418:
369:
343:
121:
92:
76:
73:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
441:
439:
430:
429:
413:
412:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
247:
246:
245:
213:
196:
179:
164:
132:
131:
72:
67:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
440:
428:
426:
421:
415:
414:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
392:
385:
381:
377:
373:
367:
366:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
340:
339:
337:
334:
324:
320:
316:
311:
310:
309:
305:
301:
296:
295:
294:
290:
286:
282:
279:
278:
277:
273:
269:
265:
264:
263:
259:
255:
251:
248:
244:
240:
236:
231:
230:
229:
225:
221:
217:
214:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
195:
191:
187:
186:Proofreader77
183:
180:
178:
175:
172:
168:
165:
163:
159:
155:
151:
148:
147:
146:
145:
141:
137:
129:
124:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
60:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
419:
416:
393:
376:24.4.102.189
335:
249:
215:
198:
181:
166:
149:
133:
45:
43:
31:
28:
370:—Preceding
344:—Preceding
250:Speedy Keep
171:Tagishsimon
315:Cybercobra
285:Cybercobra
281:An example
254:Cybercobra
169:- ditto --
50:trout slap
394:Snow keep
350:Fikusfail
300:Fikusfail
268:Fikusfail
235:Fikusfail
203:Fikusfail
136:Fikusfail
372:unsigned
358:contribs
346:unsigned
220:Townlake
128:View log
54:Zetawoof
95:protect
90:history
398:WP:SPA
199:Delete
174:(talk)
123:delete
99:delete
402:Jfire
126:) – (
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
406:talk
380:talk
354:talk
336:Keep
319:talk
304:talk
289:talk
272:talk
258:talk
239:talk
224:talk
216:Keep
207:talk
190:talk
182:Keep
167:Keep
158:talk
154:Camw
150:Keep
140:talk
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
408:)
400:.
382:)
360:)
356:•
321:)
313:--
306:)
291:)
274:)
260:)
241:)
226:)
209:)
192:)
160:)
142:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
404:(
378:(
352:(
317:(
302:(
287:(
270:(
256:(
237:(
222:(
205:(
188:(
156:(
138:(
130:)
120:(
118:)
80:(
61:)
59:ζ
57:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.