481:- I created this page, and would prefer it to be kept, as it gives useful information. But, I can understand that the routes are not notable, and should maybe be deleted if no one else wants it. Instead of being deleted, I think it should be redirected onto
537:
bus routes can be notable, and many of them are. They have rich histories, and are in the news a lot For almost any bus route, the information provided is verifiable. This article should be split into two, one for 542, and one for 543.
160:
384:. GNG must be applied here because without significant coverage in reliable sources, it is not possible to have a reliable article. I wouldn't support a merger of anything here, because it all appears to be unverified. --
418:
There's nothing here to justify keeping this. Articles on far more notable routes with much longer histories have disappeared on several occassions, and I see no reason why this should be any different.
516:
Is writing articles about bus lines like collecting stamps? I don't get it. (Don't take it too personal.) Note that there are dozends of articles like these - just look at all the blue links in
272:
154:
206:
on the grounds that "West
Midlands bus routes have already been pruned down leaving the notable ones remaining". This is an interesting reason, because the maps I have found place
520:(and it's not only this list). What do we want to do about all these? Listify? Merge into single article? Are history sections notable for a list or merged article? Or delete all?
195:'s test of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". (The article has no footnotes, and the only two external links are to primary sources).
115:
306:
363:
This article fails to meet our general notability guideline. It does not assert notability and does note cite any third-party reliable sources that attest notability.
88:
83:
92:
120:
75:
214:... and whatever the PROD-remover's idea of geography, there is no sign of any reason to treat this topic as notable per the notability guidelines.
191:
This is an article on a pair of non-notable bus routes: the article makes no assertion of notability, and there is no evidence of notability per
240:, so none of the content should be merged to other articles. After deletion, the title may of course be re-created as as a redirect, e.g. to
324:
290:
256:
175:
142:
17:
561:
547:
529:
508:
473:
450:
428:
410:
393:
372:
353:
329:
295:
261:
136:
57:
401:
sicne it does not appear possible to prevent redirects being reverted to articles on NN subjects, contrary to AFD outcome.
233:, the encyclopedia should not try to function as an alternative to the travel information published by the bus companies.
132:
578:
79:
36:
182:
71:
63:
517:
482:
320:
286:
252:
241:
218:
230:
577:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
222:
406:
490:
211:
148:
226:
389:
424:
347:
313:
279:
245:
340:
Just three years in operation, operated hourly, little/no news coverage. Not even worth a redirect.
225:, which provide more than sufficient encyclopedic coverage of bus services in the county. Per per
168:
543:
447:
402:
486:
469:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
440:. There must be millions of bus routes in the world, why do we need an article on these two?
437:
199:
385:
53:
461:
381:
192:
557:
525:
504:
420:
342:
368:
237:
539:
441:
465:
109:
49:
553:
521:
500:
364:
207:
552:
Yeah, every day they are in the news! (Sorry, could not resist.)
571:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
499:
to the list article where they are described, per nom actually.
203:
105:
101:
97:
167:
273:
181:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
581:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
307:list of England-related deletion discussions
301:
267:
305:: This debate has been included in the
271:: This debate has been included in the
236:Nothing in this article is verified per
221:and an article on the operating company
202:on 27 March, but the PROD was promptly
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
493:) 16:15, 1st April 2010 (UTC)
72:Essex bus routes 542 and 543
64:Essex bus routes 542 and 543
518:List of bus routes in Essex
483:List of bus routes in Essex
242:List of bus routes in Essex
219:List of bus routes in Essex
598:
474:21:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
451:17:37, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
429:13:24, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
411:20:54, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
394:19:24, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
373:16:06, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
354:14:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
330:13:39, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
296:13:38, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
262:13:38, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
562:08:54, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
548:04:07, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
530:20:50, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
509:21:39, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
223:Arriva Shires & Essex
58:11:16, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
574:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
212:West Midlands (region)
217:There is already a
416:Delete or redirect
44:The result was
332:
328:
310:
298:
294:
276:
260:
210:nowhere near the
198:This article was
589:
576:
446:
352:
350:
345:
319:
316:
311:
285:
282:
277:
251:
248:
186:
185:
171:
123:
113:
95:
34:
597:
596:
592:
591:
590:
588:
587:
586:
585:
579:deletion review
572:
444:
348:
343:
341:
314:
280:
246:
231:WP:NOTDIRECTORY
128:
119:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
595:
593:
584:
583:
567:
566:
565:
564:
532:
511:
494:
476:
454:
453:
448:open frequency
431:
413:
396:
375:
357:
356:
334:
333:
299:
189:
188:
125:
121:AfD statistics
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
594:
582:
580:
575:
569:
568:
563:
559:
555:
551:
550:
549:
545:
541:
536:
533:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
512:
510:
506:
502:
498:
495:
492:
488:
484:
480:
477:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
456:
455:
452:
449:
443:
439:
435:
432:
430:
426:
422:
417:
414:
412:
408:
404:
403:Peterkingiron
400:
397:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
376:
374:
370:
366:
362:
359:
358:
355:
351:
346:
339:
336:
335:
331:
326:
322:
318:
308:
304:
300:
297:
292:
288:
284:
274:
270:
266:
265:
264:
263:
258:
254:
250:
243:
239:
234:
232:
228:
224:
220:
215:
213:
209:
205:
201:
196:
194:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:Find sources:
126:
122:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
573:
570:
534:
513:
496:
487:Alex12341000
478:
460:- decidedly
457:
433:
415:
398:
377:
360:
337:
302:
268:
235:
227:WP:NOTTRAVEL
216:
197:
190:
178:
172:
164:
157:
151:
145:
139:
129:
45:
43:
31:
28:
462:not notable
386:Mkativerata
155:free images
421:Alzarian16
317:HairedGirl
283:HairedGirl
249:HairedGirl
200:WP:PRODded
204:contested
540:Dew Kane
497:Redirect
479:Redirect
442:RadManCF
380:. Fails
325:contribs
291:contribs
257:contribs
116:View log
514:Comment
466:ukexpat
438:WP:MILL
161:WP refs
149:scholar
89:protect
84:history
458:Delete
434:Delete
399:Delete
382:WP:GNG
378:Delete
361:Delete
338:Delete
321:(talk)
287:(talk)
253:(talk)
193:WP:GNG
133:Google
93:delete
50:Stifle
46:delete
554:Nageh
522:Nageh
501:Hobit
344:Aiken
315:Brown
281:Brown
247:Brown
208:Essex
176:JSTOR
137:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
558:talk
544:talk
535:Keep
526:talk
505:talk
491:talk
470:talk
436:per
425:talk
407:talk
390:talk
369:talk
365:MRSC
303:Note
269:Note
238:WP:V
229:and
169:FENS
143:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
323:• (
312:--
289:• (
278:--
255:• (
183:TWL
118:•
114:– (
560:)
546:)
528:)
507:)
485:.
472:)
464:.
427:)
409:)
392:)
371:)
309:.
275:.
244:.
163:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
556:(
542:(
524:(
503:(
489:(
468:(
445:☢
423:(
405:(
388:(
367:(
349:♫
327:)
293:)
259:)
187:)
179:·
173:·
165:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
135:(
127:(
124:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.