624:, in that this person (had she died at an average age) would have otherwise not been notable at all. All of the sources provided in the article, as well as other sources I found, only mention this person's death. As pointed out by Ricky81682, AfD's in the past have come to a consensus to delete articles of people just like this one. Per
300:
Being the oldest person in a country of 60 million, one of the oldest people ever, and the last subject of Queen
Victoria is not notable? And you're concerned about the lack of sourcing? Oh well yeah, I suppose if you just ignore all the reliable sources she was covered in. This kind of attitude
281:
and their ages or information about other "title-holders" and which "record-setters" succeeded which for each mythical "title". This is the stuff of trivia contests and hobbyist websites, not an encyclopedia. Human longevity is an important, encyclopedic topic. But not every long-lived person is
264:
This person definitely belongs on the lists where she appears (although five lists on this topic, as indicated under the "See also" heading, does seem a bit excessive.) But there's nothing in this article that's particularly notable. Simply living a long time is not
709:. Although being the oldest person in the United Kingdom is not, in itself, reason to justify a standalone article, the vast amount of media coverage given to Ethel Lang from various reliable sources certainly allows for such an article to exist.
173:
343:, and while I agree that their block was COMPLETELY justified - they violated civility - that does not mean every SC and centenarian article made by said user, or related to said user, is worthy of deletion! --
447:
as she was covered in the media for successive birthdays, being the oldest person in
Britain, and being the last British subject of Queen Victoria. Nominator has proposed a number of articles be deleted
726:. A large amount of media coverage is available, and other factors mentioned in these sources (e.g. being the last British subject of Queen Victoria) indicate notability beyond simply longevity.
344:
167:
228:
is notable. In addition, the source of this article is not incomplete. you personal reason that hate articles of longevity people is shall not reason to delete this article.--
355:
126:
99:
94:
103:
348:
423:
86:
406:
133:
644:
test". Instead of each long-living person having their own article, they could instead be mentioned in an article regarding long-living persons.
188:
155:
604:
Delete - I realized that I gave my vote in haste, and mostly because of the fact that the nominator tagged many "long living" humans citing
250:
90:
580:
491:
327:
608:. Taking into account the notability claimed in the article, as well as Knowledge's policies, I believe that this person does pass
149:
224:
Article passes notability standards. oldest person in UK and The last United
Kingdom resident who was born in during the reign of
495:
331:
254:
755:
734:
718:
695:
679:
652:
598:
571:
550:
525:
478:
466:
449:
432:
415:
397:
371:
314:
291:
237:
215:
68:
17:
145:
670:. She was clearly for being the oldest living person in the United Kingdom, and that notability does not end with death. --
339:
Ollie hit the nail on the head right there. This has devolved to the point that one editor was BLOCKED for this scenario -
82:
74:
195:
301:("people can't be notable for longevity and I don't care what you say la la la") is typical of many involved in the
675:
567:
774:
64:
40:
161:
455:
453:
579:
No specific policy cited to justify deletion. If notability and depth of coverage is the issue, redirect to
457:
393:
246:
233:
667:
302:
770:
684:
671:
563:
487:
474:
451:
428:
411:
389:
323:
310:
287:
242:
229:
36:
459:
687:- After reviewing everything again, I agree and I've changed my vote back. See my explanation above.
367:
60:
204:
Longevity is not a reason for inclusion here. Knowledge is not a directory of longest living people
181:
743:
210:
751:
714:
278:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
769:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
617:
605:
593:
514:
483:
470:
319:
306:
283:
274:
727:
629:
613:
363:
359:
340:
225:
55:
625:
609:
584:
510:
462:
444:
205:
747:
710:
633:
621:
270:
120:
688:
645:
641:
588:
543:
518:
266:
277:. Also, nearly half of the article is filled with either information about
763:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
620:
if the person won an award?), but this article also falls under
509:
on one of the many other articles that this editor nom'd for
269:
as that term is defined on
Knowledge; the only coverage in
663:
539:
506:
386:
384:
116:
112:
108:
746:
exists that the "oldest person in X Country" is kept.
273:
is news items about successive birthdays and an obit.
180:
461:), including well sourced articles that clearly pass
383:I gave a revision and add sources to this article.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
777:). No further edits should be made to this page.
194:
8:
424:list of England-related deletion discussions
422:Note: This debate has been included in the
405:Note: This debate has been included in the
517:with articles about oldest living humans).
407:list of People-related deletion discussions
282:notable simply because of their long life.
421:
404:
562:Non-policy based deletion nomination. --
345:2602:306:8381:7390:C091:2760:198B:C94
7:
305:on longevity-related articles. --
24:
581:List of British supercentenarians
358:as a block evading sockpuppet of
505:- Per the exact reason I stated
632:, this person is notable. But,
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
351:) 23:18, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
1:
83:Ethel Lang (supercentenarian)
75:Ethel Lang (supercentenarian)
756:00:35, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
735:19:24, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
719:01:22, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
696:14:04, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
680:23:16, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
653:22:55, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
599:20:27, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
572:05:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
551:14:03, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
526:23:42, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
479:22:34, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
465:, for no reason other than "
433:21:22, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
416:21:22, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
398:17:22, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
372:09:14, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
362:who already voted above. --
315:22:40, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
292:15:26, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
238:10:56, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
216:21:56, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
69:00:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
668:notability is not temporary
794:
279:her non-notable relatives
766:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
636:is meant to be a check
744:longstanding tradition
666:and keep in mind that
640:people who pass the "
542:with my explanation.
496:few or no other edits
332:few or no other edits
255:few or no other edits
498:outside this topic.
467:I just don't like it
356:indefinitely blocked
334:outside this topic.
257:outside this topic.
499:
443:. Clearly passes
435:
418:
374:
335:
258:
59:
56:non-admin closure
785:
768:
732:
692:
685:I am One of Many
672:I am One of Many
662:See my comments
649:
564:I am One of Many
547:
534:Changed back to
522:
481:
431:
414:
354:Editor has been
353:
317:
271:reliable sources
240:
213:
208:
199:
198:
184:
136:
124:
106:
53:
34:
793:
792:
788:
787:
786:
784:
783:
782:
781:
775:deletion review
764:
728:
690:
647:
597:
545:
520:
427:
410:
360:User:DN-boards1
303:WP:BATTLEGROUND
211:
206:
141:
132:
97:
81:
78:
61:DavidLeighEllis
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
791:
789:
780:
779:
759:
758:
737:
721:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
657:
656:
601:
591:
574:
556:
555:
554:
553:
529:
528:
500:
437:
436:
419:
401:
400:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
295:
294:
259:
226:Queen Victoria
202:
201:
138:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
790:
778:
776:
772:
767:
761:
760:
757:
753:
749:
745:
741:
738:
736:
733:
731:
725:
722:
720:
716:
712:
708:
705:
704:
697:
694:
693:
686:
683:
682:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
661:
660:
659:
658:
655:
654:
651:
650:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
615:
611:
607:
602:
600:
595:
590:
586:
582:
578:
575:
573:
569:
565:
561:
558:
557:
552:
549:
548:
541:
537:
533:
532:
531:
530:
527:
524:
523:
516:
512:
508:
504:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
458:
456:
454:
452:
450:
446:
442:
439:
438:
434:
430:
429:North America
425:
420:
417:
413:
412:North America
408:
403:
402:
399:
395:
391:
390:Inception2010
387:
385:
382:
381:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
352:
350:
346:
342:
337:
336:
333:
329:
325:
321:
316:
312:
308:
304:
299:
298:
297:
296:
293:
289:
285:
280:
276:
272:
268:
263:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
243:Inception2010
239:
235:
231:
230:Inception2010
227:
223:
220:
219:
218:
217:
214:
209:
197:
193:
190:
187:
183:
179:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
147:
144:
143:Find sources:
139:
135:
131:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
66:
62:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
765:
762:
739:
729:
723:
706:
689:
646:
637:
603:
576:
559:
544:
535:
519:
502:
440:
338:
261:
221:
203:
191:
185:
177:
170:
164:
158:
152:
142:
129:
49:
47:
31:
28:
585:alternative
494:) has made
484:Ollie231213
471:Ollie231213
330:) has made
320:Ollie231213
307:Ollie231213
284:David in DC
253:) has made
168:free images
364:Ricky81682
341:DN-boards1
771:talk page
618:WP:ANYBIO
616:(perhaps
606:WP:NOTDIR
540:this edit
515:WP:NOTDIR
275:WP:NOPAGE
37:talk page
773:or in a
691:~Oshwah~
648:~Oshwah~
630:WP:BASIC
614:WP:BASIC
546:~Oshwah~
521:~Oshwah~
513:(citing
492:contribs
328:contribs
251:contribs
127:View log
39:or in a
748:Bearian
711:Bodgey5
642:notable
638:against
267:notable
174:WP refs
162:scholar
100:protect
95:history
730:Yiosie
626:WP:GNG
610:WP:GNG
589:clpo13
583:as an
538:. See
469:". --
463:WP:GNG
445:WP:GNG
262:Delete
212:Faddle
207:Fiddle
146:Google
104:delete
634:WP:1E
622:WP:1E
189:JSTOR
150:books
134:Stats
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
752:talk
740:Keep
724:Keep
715:talk
707:Keep
676:talk
664:here
628:and
612:and
594:talk
577:Keep
568:talk
560:Keep
536:Keep
507:here
503:Keep
488:talk
475:talk
441:Keep
394:talk
368:talk
349:talk
324:talk
311:talk
288:talk
247:talk
234:talk
222:Keep
182:FENS
156:news
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
65:talk
50:keep
511:AFD
196:TWL
125:– (
52:.
754:)
742:-
717:)
678:)
587:.
570:)
490:•
482:—
477:)
426:.
409:.
396:)
388:--
370:)
326:•
318:—
313:)
290:)
249:•
241:—
236:)
176:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
67:)
750:(
713:(
674:(
596:)
592:(
566:(
486:(
473:(
448:(
392:(
366:(
347:(
322:(
309:(
286:(
245:(
232:(
200:)
192:·
186:·
178:·
171:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
148:(
140:(
137:)
130:·
123:)
85:(
63:(
58:)
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.