Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Eunice Sanborn - Knowledge

Source 📝

510:, where the event is "staying alive." The well-documented very oldest people are collectively encyclopedic, expressing examples of the extremes within the human species, but if all they are known for is being alive for a long time, they do not need individual directory-type articles, since Knowledge is 379:
Would you vote to keep it once she's died? There is nothing notable about her whatsoever beyond thus far having remained alive. The article, if kept, will forever be a stub as there is nothing notable whatsoever about her beyond her age. The moment she passes, her notability passes with her. Nothing
474:
The guidelines are fairly implicit and her longevity is noteworthy and if she keeps living and those ahead of her on the list keep dying, she can end up higher in the ranks and garner further notability. Besides the fact that this
418:
Dude, I have read that. I don't think she's notable now, nor is it likely that she will do anything notable before she dies. Simply being one of the billions of non-dead people on the planet isn't, IMHO, notable.
157: 118: 380:
against the woman herself, but I can't see how she comes anywhere close to meriting a separate article. Simply a mention on the 10-oldest link should be more than sufficient.
151: 529:
You are wrong to say her biography would be the same if she died at 90, if she died at 90 she wouldn't be in the top ten and she wouldn't be Texas' oldest person.
506:
where she is already on the list of "Ten oldest people" and can remain on the list of "Oldest people since 1955" after she goes to her reward. Fails
258:
adding that as a source might be COI, but others could find it. Note the claimed age is born in 1895, but the 1896 record comes from census data.
343:
can be found. A blog and one local news story is not sufficient. Would be willing to change my !vote if more sources can be found. Cheers,
322: 301:
that says people 110 and older are einherently notable and must be given a directory-type article. Please point out what you are citing.
530: 563: 91: 86: 357: 95: 562:
I read that part, and if she didn't continue living she wouldn't be in the top ten and she wouldn't be the oldest person in Texas.
353: 476: 78: 17: 172: 139: 514:
a directory. Her biography is apparently, other than the continued living, no different than if she had passed at age 90.
424: 385: 479:
and that the guidelines seem to indicate that she classifies as being noteworthy, I've found a few more sources for her
222:. I was able to find the following reference that is from a 3rd party – independent – verifiable – creditable source. 193: 585: 36: 133: 48:. Verifiability seems to be no longer contested, and we have no consensus as to notability, so default to keep. 584:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
326: 249:. It's clear that the article is under construction. She is verified to be the world's 10th-oldest person here: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
534: 567: 405: 571: 556: 538: 523: 493: 464: 428: 409: 389: 365: 361: 347: 330: 310: 289: 267: 239: 197: 129: 60: 462: 189: 223: 179: 489: 211: 482: 227: 165: 82: 401: 344: 354:
http://www.dailytexanonline.com/state-local/at-114-one-of-texas-supercentenarians-dies-1.949307
455: 285: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
552: 519: 443: 306: 219: 145: 507: 485: 480: 259: 215: 74: 66: 51: 511: 503: 298: 277: 420: 381: 340: 281: 112: 548: 515: 302: 207: 547:
Did you read the part where I said "other than the continued living?"
448:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
398:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:NOTE#Notability_is_not_temporary
253: 578:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
397: 188:
Non-notable person. Only reference is an unreliable blog.
108: 104: 100: 164: 453:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 588:). No further edits should be made to this page. 225:. I’ll in-line cite it in the article. Thanks 210:that the only thing you have to do to become 178: 8: 280:as interpreted for supercentenarians. 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 572:21:36, 26 September 2009 (UTC) 557:19:48, 26 September 2009 (UTC) 539:21:47, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 524:17:42, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 494:03:01, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 465:00:48, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 429:13:48, 23 September 2009 (UTC) 410:19:27, 22 September 2009 (UTC) 390:16:35, 22 September 2009 (UTC) 366:20:39, 19 September 2009 (UTC) 348:16:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC) 331:22:49, 18 September 2009 (UTC) 311:17:47, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 290:15:18, 18 September 2009 (UTC) 268:21:33, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 254:http://www.grg.org/Adams/E.HTM 240:17:48, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 198:16:51, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 1: 61:17:15, 2 October 2009 (UTC) 605: 477:isn't a paper encyclopedia 214:is to live long enough. 206:– One of the few times in 581:Please do not modify it. 339:unless more non-trivial 32:Please do not modify it. 276:Clearly notable per 356:There is a source. 396:dude, please read 44:The result was 467: 297:I see nothing in 220:supercentenarians 190:Crotchety Old Man 59: 596: 583: 458: 452: 450: 446: 341:reliable sources 265: 262: 238: 218:qualifies under 183: 182: 168: 116: 98: 58: 56: 49: 34: 604: 603: 599: 598: 597: 595: 594: 593: 592: 586:deletion review 579: 456: 444: 441: 427: 388: 321:per Ryoung122. 263: 260: 226: 125: 89: 73: 70: 52: 50: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 602: 600: 591: 590: 560: 559: 527: 526: 469: 468: 451: 438: 436: 434: 433: 432: 431: 423: 413: 412: 393: 392: 384: 351: 350: 323:74.249.149.228 316: 315: 314: 313: 251: 250: 243: 242: 186: 185: 122: 75:Eunice Sanborn 69: 67:Eunice Sanborn 64: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 601: 589: 587: 582: 576: 575: 574: 573: 569: 565: 558: 554: 550: 546: 543: 542: 541: 540: 536: 532: 531:74.249.149.87 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 505: 504:Oldest people 501: 498: 497: 496: 495: 491: 487: 483: 481: 478: 473: 466: 463: 460: 459: 449: 447: 440: 439: 437: 430: 426: 422: 417: 416: 415: 414: 411: 407: 403: 402:Longevitydude 399: 395: 394: 391: 387: 383: 378: 377:Strong delete 375: 374: 370: 369: 368: 367: 363: 359: 355: 349: 346: 342: 338: 335: 334: 333: 332: 328: 324: 320: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 293: 292: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 272: 271: 270: 269: 266: 256: 255: 248: 245: 244: 241: 237: 236: 233: 230: 224: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 202: 201: 200: 199: 195: 191: 181: 177: 174: 171: 167: 163: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 138: 135: 131: 128: 127:Find sources: 123: 120: 114: 110: 106: 102: 97: 93: 88: 84: 80: 76: 72: 71: 68: 65: 63: 62: 57: 55: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 580: 577: 564:67.33.119.28 561: 544: 528: 499: 484:if it helps 471: 470: 457:Juliancolton 454: 442: 435: 376: 372: 371: 352: 336: 318: 317: 294: 273: 257: 252: 246: 234: 231: 228: 203: 187: 175: 169: 161: 154: 148: 142: 136: 126: 53: 46:no consensus 45: 43: 31: 28: 358:65.81.247.9 319:Strong keep 274:Speedy keep 216:Ms. Sanborn 152:free images 486:KirkCliff2 54:Sandstein 208:Knowledge 508:WP:BLP1E 500:Redirect 445:Relisted 421:B.Rossow 382:B.Rossow 119:View log 545:Comment 295:Comment 282:ukexpat 212:notable 158:WP refs 146:scholar 92:protect 87:history 549:Edison 516:Edison 373:Delete 337:Delete 303:Edison 299:WP:BIO 278:WP:BIO 261:Ryoung 232:hoesss 130:Google 96:delete 425:contr 386:contr 247:Keep. 173:JSTOR 134:books 113:views 105:watch 101:links 16:< 568:talk 553:talk 535:talk 520:talk 490:talk 472:Keep 406:talk 362:talk 327:talk 307:talk 286:talk 204:Keep 194:talk 166:FENS 140:news 109:logs 83:talk 79:edit 512:not 502:to 419:-- 264:122 180:TWL 117:– ( 570:) 555:) 537:) 522:) 492:) 461:| 408:) 400:-- 364:) 345:CP 329:) 309:) 288:) 196:) 160:) 111:| 107:| 103:| 99:| 94:| 90:| 85:| 81:| 566:( 551:( 533:( 518:( 488:( 404:( 360:( 325:( 305:( 284:( 235:S 229:S 192:( 184:) 176:· 170:· 162:· 155:· 149:· 143:· 137:· 132:( 124:( 121:) 115:) 77:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
 Sandstein 
17:15, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Eunice Sanborn
Eunice Sanborn
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Crotchety Old Man
talk
16:51, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Knowledge
notable

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.