180:. I don't think it's a fringe article (this isn't the American Knowledge; an article about a notable British phenomenon is just as notable as one about an American phenomenon), but it's hopelessly POV. I think a good article could be made out of the topic, but this is not the article. In fact, it reads like an essay someone did in school one day. --
238:- I have reverted to this article to an older edit. Some of the above criticisms are less valid when considering the older text (e.g. less POV). If there is going to be a vote on keeping the article or not, perhaps it should be re-done, based on the older version, before un-encyclopedic edits were made. --
135:
without prejudice that someone else could write a completely different article on this subject that we could keep. no comment on notability; can't tell from article. But extremely unencyclopedic article, and lacking context as well.
225:
when I was earning my history degree, I used to say that
History should be a B.S. degree because we BS'ed around that which we didn't know... this article seems like one where in a person BS'ed around the fact that s/he didn't
88:
83:
92:
210:
There is no encyclopedic material not included in the article about the parent body, the Free Church of
England. That this article doesn't even link to that one demonstrates its uselessness in its present form..
75:
79:
71:
63:
115:
242:
230:
217:
202:
186:
172:
156:
140:
126:
57:
194:
reads like a POV essay. It might be possible to write a decent article on this, but as we'd have to start from scratch we might as well delete it.
17:
257:
36:
256:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
153:
52:
168:
topic (at least from the Yankee perspective) that is POV in addition to being totally unreadable.
239:
181:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
165:
227:
123:
149:
49:
169:
137:
196:
109:
48:. The arguments still appear to be mostly valid even after the reversion. --
213:
250:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
105:
101:
97:
72:
Evangelical
Connexion of the Free Church of England
64:
Evangelical
Connexion of the Free Church of England
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
260:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
122:hopelessly POV, doesn't seem to be notable
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
277:
148:without prejudice due to
253:Please do not modify it.
243:22:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
231:21:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
218:23:39, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
203:09:30, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
187:08:06, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
173:06:40, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
157:05:26, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
141:05:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
127:05:16, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
58:04:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
268:
255:
184:
113:
95:
55:
34:
276:
275:
271:
270:
269:
267:
266:
265:
264:
258:deletion review
251:
182:
86:
70:
67:
53:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
274:
272:
263:
262:
246:
245:
233:
220:
205:
189:
175:
159:
154:Metropolitan90
143:
120:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
273:
261:
259:
254:
248:
247:
244:
241:
237:
234:
232:
229:
224:
221:
219:
216:
215:
209:
206:
204:
201:
200:
199:
193:
190:
188:
185:
179:
176:
174:
171:
167:
163:
160:
158:
155:
151:
147:
144:
142:
139:
134:
131:
130:
129:
128:
125:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
252:
249:
240:BenStevenson
235:
222:
212:
207:
197:
195:
191:
177:
161:
145:
132:
121:
45:
43:
31:
28:
164:a possibly
150:bias issues
228:Balloonman
124:Makerowner
166:WP:Fringe
183:Charlene
170:VanTucky
138:Capmango
116:View log
198:Hut 8.5
89:protect
84:history
223:Delete
208:Delete
192:Delete
178:Delete
162:Delete
146:Delete
133:Delete
93:delete
46:delete
226:know.
110:views
102:watch
98:links
54:desat
16:<
236:Keep
152:. --
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
50:Core
214:DGG
114:– (
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
118:)
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.