Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Evangelical Renewal Therapy - Knowledge

Source 📝

263:, The rules do not prevent the author of research which has been published in peer reviewed journals to create a neutral page on that topic. When an academic article is listed in a bibliographic section of another academic paper, it means that it was mentioned in the article. Entriles are not placed in bibliographic sections as filler items. Citation means that the material is considered as having some value. Although ERT has fewer citations that other recognized forms of Christian psychotherapy, it has miminal acceptance in the field of Christian Psychotherapy. No negative articles have been published against ERT. 303:
No one says your paper has no value. You will however notice the absence of, say, a few million Knowledge articles on other valuable scientific contributions. Every scientist has a list of published papers, every scientist has to some extent developed new terminology. To conclude that your theory has
221:, and comes to conclusions (repentance is achieved through...). This is not an encyclopedic article now, and written by the author himself, is unlikely to become one. I do not even know if the title of the article is valid in the mainstream study, or if it was coined by the author. Essays like this 245:, weakly. This actually gets seven Google Scholar hits. One is for a report by the author; others seem to be citing that work, and as is usual in Scholar hits its hard to judge the depth of coverage. Not yet convinced that this is significant enough to count as a notable theory. - 455:
The topic seems to be of nominal notability based on references to Rev. Saucer's work. However, the article needs to be improved, and requires improved references. If the article can't be improved in the normal 30 days or so, it may be re-nominated for lack of verifying sources.
401:, I find that the criteria for deleting the ERT to be capricious and not applied equally. Allowing Nouthetic Counseling to remain while allowing ERT to be deleted shows a pov bias. The Nouthetic Counseling is more of a neologism than ERT. 381:, doesn't really belong there, either. As noted by others above, I think the article is non-encyclopedic, the term is a neologism, and the subject is not notable for WP purposes. The COI issue only further strengthens this view. 160: 191:
I declined the speedy tag but believe the article is unencyclopedic, and the term is a neologism. Would need a fundamental rewrite, mostly because it is not about the therapy itself but about the
154: 195:. The references are: Two passing mentions, one listing in a large bibliography, the paper itself, and a further proof that the paper exists. Not sufficiently notable as a topic. 477: 115: 88: 83: 92: 75: 120: 337:
I had eidted Christian Counseling article which needs editing to show that there are organized and recogniozed modalities of Christian Counseling.
175: 142: 213:. This article is written about a topic and/or is research by Patrick Saucer. Patrick Saucer also wrote the article. Clearly this is 334: 277:
Note: all edits by this user have been about this topic, even if only to add the text "including religous counseling" to pages. —
502:
As the author of this page, I am requesting that it be immedately deleted as I am unable to rectify the problems listed above.
463: 17: 136: 511: 492: 467: 443: 410: 390: 363: 346: 321: 289: 272: 253: 237: 204: 57: 132: 79: 430:
is not reason to keep this article. But it might be a reason for a separate AfD for that one, or a reason to include
304:"miminal acceptance" because it has not been refuted is adventurous -- on the contrary: If someone wrote an article 182: 525: 71: 63: 36: 524:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
333:
having been cited in at least five scholary books shows that ERT is more than a flight of fancy on my part.
507: 439: 406: 386: 342: 268: 53: 148: 359: 285: 233: 431: 427: 423: 398: 374: 353: 279: 227: 168: 317: 222: 200: 397:
Considering that the subject matter, size, and format of the ERT article is similar to that of
335:
http://books.google.com/books?as_brr=0&as_pub=-icon&q=%22Evangelical+Renewal+Therapy%22
503: 488: 435: 402: 382: 338: 264: 49: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
250: 378: 457: 313: 218: 214: 196: 484: 109: 351:
Note: This "keep" is the second from the article's author. Only one vote, sir! —
246: 518:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
426:
and that an IP editor removed the prod. Regardless, that
105: 101: 97: 167: 373:
per the nom. This is at best a POV content fork from
217:. Also, this article reads like an essay, is clearly 478:list of Christianity-related deletion discussions 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 528:). No further edits should be made to this page. 48:. following the request of the single author. 223:should fall under some CSD; I wish they would 181: 8: 472: 476:: This debate has been included in the 377:or other counseling articles, but per 7: 251:killing the human spirit since 2003! 24: 312:would indicate its importance. -- 422:It looks like an editor proded 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 72:Evangelical Renewal Therapy 64:Evangelical Renewal Therapy 545: 521:Please do not modify it. 512:09:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC) 493:15:52, 18 May 2010 (UTC) 468:12:37, 18 May 2010 (UTC) 444:18:59, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 411:16:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 391:16:40, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 364:16:41, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 347:14:56, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 322:22:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 290:14:48, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 273:14:41, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 254:14:18, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 238:13:49, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 205:13:44, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 58:14:27, 19 May 2010 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 432:Nouthetic Counseling 424:Nouthetic Counseling 399:Nouthetic Counseling 375:Christian counseling 193:paper on the therapy 428:other stuff exists 44:The result was 495: 481: 362: 288: 236: 536: 523: 482: 460: 358: 352: 284: 278: 232: 226: 186: 185: 171: 123: 113: 95: 34: 544: 543: 539: 538: 537: 535: 534: 533: 532: 526:deletion review 519: 466: 458: 356: 282: 247:Smerdis of Tlön 230: 128: 119: 86: 70: 67: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 542: 540: 531: 530: 497: 496: 470: 462: 449: 448: 447: 446: 414: 413: 394: 393: 368: 367: 366: 327: 326: 325: 324: 295: 294: 293: 292: 257: 256: 240: 189: 188: 125: 121:AfD statistics 66: 61: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 541: 529: 527: 522: 516: 515: 514: 513: 509: 505: 501: 494: 490: 486: 479: 475: 471: 469: 465: 461: 454: 451: 450: 445: 441: 437: 434:in this AfD. 433: 429: 425: 421: 418: 417: 416: 415: 412: 408: 404: 400: 396: 395: 392: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 369: 365: 361: 355: 350: 349: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 329: 328: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 302: 299: 298: 297: 296: 291: 287: 281: 276: 275: 274: 270: 266: 262: 259: 258: 255: 252: 248: 244: 241: 239: 235: 229: 224: 220: 216: 212: 211:Strong delete 209: 208: 207: 206: 202: 198: 194: 184: 180: 177: 174: 170: 166: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 138: 134: 131: 130:Find sources: 126: 122: 117: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 90: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 68: 65: 62: 60: 59: 55: 51: 47: 46:speedy delete 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 520: 517: 504:Prsaucer1958 499: 498: 473: 452: 436:Novaseminary 419: 403:Prsaucer1958 383:Novaseminary 370: 339:Prsaucer1958 330: 309: 305: 300: 265:Prsaucer1958 260: 242: 210: 192: 190: 178: 172: 164: 157: 151: 145: 139: 129: 50:Pax:Vobiscum 45: 43: 31: 28: 155:free images 485:• Gene93k 459:WikiDan61 500:Request 464:ReadMe!! 379:WP:UNDUE 354:Timneu22 314:Pgallert 301:Comment: 280:Timneu22 228:Timneu22 197:Pgallert 116:View log 420:Comment 306:against 161:WP refs 149:scholar 89:protect 84:history 371:Delete 243:Delete 219:WP:POV 215:WP:COI 133:Google 93:delete 308:ERT, 176:JSTOR 137:books 110:views 102:watch 98:links 16:< 508:talk 489:talk 474:Note 453:Keep 440:talk 407:talk 387:talk 360:talk 343:talk 331:keep 318:talk 310:that 286:talk 269:talk 261:Keep 234:talk 225:. — 201:talk 169:FENS 143:news 106:logs 80:talk 76:edit 54:talk 483:-- 183:TWL 118:• 114:– ( 510:) 491:) 480:. 442:) 409:) 389:) 345:) 320:) 271:) 249:- 203:) 163:) 108:| 104:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 82:| 78:| 56:) 506:( 487:( 438:( 405:( 385:( 357:· 341:( 316:( 283:· 267:( 231:· 199:( 187:) 179:· 173:· 165:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 140:· 135:( 127:( 124:) 112:) 74:( 52:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Pax:Vobiscum
talk
14:27, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Evangelical Renewal Therapy
Evangelical Renewal Therapy
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
AfD statistics
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Pgallert
talk
13:44, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.