226:: There are two links to external and trusted news sources (heise.de, highscalability.com and oschina). If you go to twitter or github you can see that a lot of people are using the software and found it interesting. The code is available - it's clearly not a hoax or vapoware. What else is required to proof notability?
308:
page. The BigQuery page does not add _any_ references or external links. For EventQL you can go to GitHub and check that it has received a lot of interest from developers, for BigQuery you have to rely on google press releases (it's the only linked information). Why are different rules applied here?
523:
IP 62.251.60.126 highlights 3 sources: heise.de, highscalability.com and oschina. OSChina seems to be community page, highscalability.com blog (however some articles are nice). So only heise.de can be considered reliable source for
Knowledge (XXG) purposes, but its coverage of EventQL is brief (one
329:
Being "unfair and uncompetitive" is irrelevant, as
Knowledge (XXG) is not a marketing tool. If you think another article should be deleted, then you are free to propose deletion of that article, but the decision whether to delete
165:
118:
196:
No evidence of satisfying
Knowledge (XXG)'s notability guidelines. The references are not independent, and no notability is added by external links such as a listing at the
384:
364:
312:
Either both pages should be deleted or the EventQL page should be kept. Deleting EventQL but keeping BigQuery would be highly unfair and uncompetitive to open-source.
159:
334:
or not will be made on the merits or lack of merits of that article, not on the basis of another article which may or may not qualify for inclusion. See
243:
238:
125:
313:
17:
484:
466:
446:
552:
40:
392:
372:
180:
91:
86:
424:
Github projects come and go so quickly, so someone just noting that they exist is not enough evidence of notability.
147:
95:
412:
407:- there does not appear to be any reliable coverage in independent sources. Doesn't meet notability guidelines.
78:
317:
244:
http://www.heise.de/developer/meldung/Developer-Snapshots-Programmierer-News-in-ein-zwei-Saetzen-3281003.html
480:
462:
335:
293:
388:
368:
349:
239:
http://highscalability.com/blog/2016/8/19/stuff-the-internet-says-on-scalability-for-august-19th-2016.html
211:
502:
found in searches or in the above bulleted list to demonstrate that this project has attained notability
141:
548:
36:
408:
503:
428:
certainly needs work, but it has been around six years and noticed by those besides its developers.
137:
433:
173:
533:
515:
488:
470:
437:
416:
396:
376:
353:
321:
215:
82:
60:
476:
458:
524:
small paragraph among other news about software). Not enough to estabilish notability, I fear.
187:
345:
304:
Please also consider that EventQL is the open-source version of BigQuery and compare with the
207:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
547:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
331:
74:
66:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
529:
511:
499:
429:
268:
153:
253:
200:
hosting service and a page which merely gives a three-sentence inclusion in a list.
54:
112:
273:
525:
248:
507:
298:
288:
263:
258:
425:
305:
294:
http://www.shuogesha.com.cn/t/b750feff68b1472ba4f2a4f877df1add/index.htm
278:
283:
197:
229:
Here is a list of independent articles/discussions around EventQL :
233:
541:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
449:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
457:
Have the sources mentioned by 62.251.60.126 been analyzed?
108:
104:
100:
172:
475:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
186:
269:http://www.wandoujia.com/items/5719350939885781862
254:http://www.piaoliang100.com/news/tech/263849.html
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
555:). No further edits should be made to this page.
274:http://news.shamcode.ru/blog/eventql--eventql/
385:list of Software-related deletion discussions
365:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
249:https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12166370
8:
383:Note: This debate has been included in the
363:Note: This debate has been included in the
382:
362:
299:http://www.codesec.net/view/457743.html
289:http://b.hatena.ne.jp/entry/eventql.io/
264:http://www.tuicool.com/articles/MrmYBvm
259:http://udn.yyuap.com/article-12515.html
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
279:http://www.web520.cn/archives/16725
284:http://cpp.ctolib.com/eventql.html
24:
341:The editor who uses the pseudonym
203:The editor who uses the pseudonym
234:http://www.oschina.net/p/eventql
1:
61:23:08, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
534:13:24, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
516:18:54, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
489:09:04, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
471:09:04, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
438:23:02, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
417:19:06, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
397:16:23, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
377:16:23, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
354:14:04, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
322:14:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
216:14:28, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
572:
500:reliable 3rd party sources
544:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
455:Relisting comment:
491:
399:
389:Shawn in Montreal
379:
369:Shawn in Montreal
343:
205:
563:
546:
474:
452:
450:
339:
201:
191:
190:
176:
128:
116:
98:
57:
34:
571:
570:
566:
565:
564:
562:
561:
560:
559:
553:deletion review
542:
492:
445:
443:
409:FuriouslySerene
133:
124:
89:
73:
70:
55:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
569:
567:
558:
557:
537:
536:
518:
473:
453:
442:
441:
440:
419:
401:
400:
380:
359:
358:
357:
356:
302:
301:
296:
291:
286:
281:
276:
271:
266:
261:
256:
251:
246:
241:
236:
194:
193:
130:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
568:
556:
554:
550:
545:
539:
538:
535:
531:
527:
522:
519:
517:
513:
509:
505:
504:at this point
501:
497:
494:
493:
490:
486:
485:contributions
482:
478:
477:Jo-Jo Eumerus
472:
468:
467:contributions
464:
460:
459:Jo-Jo Eumerus
456:
451:
448:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
420:
418:
414:
410:
406:
403:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
381:
378:
374:
370:
366:
361:
360:
355:
351:
347:
342:
337:
336:WP:OTHERSTUFF
333:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
319:
315:
314:62.251.60.126
310:
307:
300:
297:
295:
292:
290:
287:
285:
282:
280:
277:
275:
272:
270:
267:
265:
262:
260:
257:
255:
252:
250:
247:
245:
242:
240:
237:
235:
232:
231:
230:
227:
225:
221:
218:
217:
213:
209:
204:
199:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
127:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
543:
540:
520:
495:
454:
444:
421:
404:
346:JamesBWatson
340:
311:
303:
228:
223:
222:
219:
208:JamesBWatson
202:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
121:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
160:free images
549:talk page
430:W Nowicki
37:talk page
551:or in a
447:Relisted
426:BigQuery
306:BigQuery
119:View log
39:or in a
521:Comment
332:EventQL
166:WP refs
154:scholar
92:protect
87:history
75:EventQL
67:EventQL
56:MBisanz
526:Pavlor
496:Delete
422:Delete
405:Delete
198:GitHub
138:Google
96:delete
50:delete
508:AllyD
498:: No
181:JSTOR
142:books
126:Stats
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
530:talk
512:talk
481:talk
463:talk
434:talk
413:talk
393:talk
373:talk
350:talk
318:talk
224:KEEP
220:---
212:talk
174:FENS
148:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
348:" (
210:" (
188:TWL
117:– (
52:.
532:)
514:)
506:.
487:)
483:,
469:)
465:,
436:)
415:)
395:)
387:.
375:)
367:.
352:)
338:.
320:)
214:)
168:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
528:(
510:(
479:(
461:(
432:(
411:(
391:(
371:(
344:"
316:(
206:"
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
122:·
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.