886:? If we had a lot of sourced, reliable and widely accepted evidence about CIA involvement in the World Trade Center attacks, that would be a legitimate article. But we do have a lot of such evidence about FSB involvement, as described in multiple reliable sources, and as admitted by many main-stream historians and politicians in Russia and US.
390:
88:
395:
648:
expounding its subject, it is PoV), but the nominators and respondents are quite correct in stating that mentions of alternate views are completely lacking. Lacking a perspective can itself be described as PoV, but for the sake of the distinction, I hope you will agree that there is no other sort of
663:
question the official account on the
Russian apartment bombings" This also applies to any article with 'conspiracy theory' in the title. Articles should present the evidence, not frame it. I am not saying it is easy to find a NPOV title for POV information, but there has to be an alternative that
473:
So you would delete the neutral article (which discusses all points of view), and keep the POV article (which discusses only a single point of view, and doesn't even mention any of the other POVs)? If you want to have a subarticle, then can you tell me what exactly is the advantage of having an
385:
380:
83:
653:
by suggesting that content is grounds for deletion. As usual, this is a matter for the talk page. Note that there are only three entries in talk, all by the same person. That AfDs are commonly used in lieu of discussion and improvement is all the more reason to oppose such
187:
115:
110:
119:
102:
370:
and briefly summarize the corresponding content in main article. I wanted to do just that but I could not, because nominator of this AfD reverted all my changes there. But that is what should be done. Note that we have the following
607:
as POV fork. The appropriate information will be preserved in the primary article so this should be non-controversial. Editors should be reminded that having an article about something in
Knowledge (XXG) doesn't make it "true".
181:
914:
895:
877:
844:
822:
800:
774:
725:
703:
673:
636:
617:
597:
577:
554:
511:
491:
468:
442:
411:
353:
67:
832:
148:
202:
169:
644:
The article needs considerable work, obviously. It is very good at expounding on its subject without being PoV (where editors in this and the previous AfD contend that
163:
159:
106:
232:
209:
865:
98:
73:
828:
806:
788:
784:
499:
452:
448:
430:
418:
341:
327:
305:
292:
279:
254:
228:
809:
appears to be a POVFORK of this article, since that article discusses a number of "conspiracy theories" whereas this article merely presents
175:
860:- an article purporting to give "evidence" for a controversial conspiracy theory seems like a darn clear case of blatant violation of
17:
231:, while at the same time conveniently dropping all criticism of the theory and all other points of view. Imagine if someone forked
421:. Why is that not enough? Can you please explain we need this article which (in addition to being a textbook example of
933:
36:
787:). Please tell me why that one is not enough. The POV issues in this article can be fixed by redirecting this page to
474:
inherently POV article titled "Evidence of..." instead of a balanced one? Are you sure you have read and understood
910:
873:
363:
337:
314:
266:
250:
224:
791:
where all of this material is already present and where it is discussed in a neutral way, under a neutral title.
932:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
545:
talk page alone deserves reading to learn about
Biophys straightforward tactics. Common pattern of behaviour.
236:
60:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
692:
659:
It is 'Theories' that is PoV, and insidiously so, with a sentence-as-paragraph at the beginning: "A number of
336:
Since the material is already present at other articles, and since we already have a valid content fork of
550:
533:. When Biophys doesn't reach consensus with other editors, he starts spawning numerous fork articles like
906:
883:
869:
669:
573:
891:
861:
650:
507:
464:
407:
613:
684:
530:
479:
422:
220:
89:
Articles for deletion/Evidence of FSB involvement in the
Russian apartment bombings (2nd nomination)
49:
660:
402:
Besides, nothing had changed since the previous AfD discussion of this article (one could read it).
195:
53:
887:
688:
503:
460:
403:
840:
818:
796:
770:
721:
593:
534:
487:
438:
349:
243:
546:
542:
538:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
761:. In other words, it is a reasonable sub-article split from an overly long main article, per
498:
A lot of existing article are POVish form the point of view of individual editors (including
475:
433:? I can think of no other reason for the existence of this article other than to push a POV.
665:
569:
762:
713:
625:
covered in other articles, and an intrinsically POV title, inappropriate for a redirect.
585:
565:
367:
864:(we are not supposed to have such articles on Wiki). Any chance we'll have something like
609:
451:
should be removed or briefly summarized. Actually, I would nominate for deletion article
836:
814:
792:
766:
717:
700:
632:
589:
483:
434:
345:
664:
introduces readers to the subject, without telling them what the facts constitute.
328:
Theories of
Russian apartment bombings#Arrest of independent investigator Trepashkin
84:
Articles for deletion/Evidence of FSB involvement in the
Russian apartment bombings
136:
783:
Have you read what I said in my nomination? There is already a valid subarticle (
306:
Theories of
Russian apartment bombings#Sealing of all materials by Russian Duma
905:
is a scientific theory accepted by most scientists. Sorry, you have no case.
457:
nominating articles for deletion is not the way of resolving content disputes
901:
366:
is very big. So, it only makes sense to create a number of sub-articles per
627:
246:: it combines different events and different sources to advance a theory.
765:. If there are POV issues, this can be rectified in this sub-article. --
249:
3. This material is already present in other articles. The two articles
223:. The creator has forked material supporting the conspiracy theory from
693:
use
Knowledge (XXG) as a tool for advocacy and promotion of his own POV
649:
PoV in it. As usual for AfD, the nomination overreaches the mandate of
293:
Theories of
Russian apartment bombings#Incident in Russian Parliament
813:
of FSB involvement without taking a POV on "conspiracy theories". --
233:
Evidence of US government involvement in the
September 11 attacks
926:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
315:
Russian_apartment_bombings#Attempts_at_independent_investigation
257:
cover all this material in a much more neutral and balances way.
239:- that would be a similar case and would definitely get deleted.
502:
of course). This is a reason for improvement, not for deletion.
280:
Theories of Russian apartment bombings#Explosives controversies
866:
Evidence of CIA involvement in the World Trade Center attacks
99:
Evidence of FSB involvement in the Russian apartment bombings
74:
Evidence of FSB involvement in the Russian apartment bombings
697:
the article is available in its entireity in other articles
537:
or adding fork content to already existing articles like
344:) I see absolutely no need for this kind of POV article.
833:
Explanation attempts for the Russian apartment bombings
758:
754:
750:
746:
742:
143:
132:
128:
124:
194:
699:
where it is possible to be covered in an NPOV way. --
208:
391:ru:Π’Π΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡ Π½Π° ΠΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ (1999)
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
936:). No further edits should be made to this page.
417:We already have a perfectly valid subarticle:
320:Arrest of independent investigator Trepashkin
8:
827:Your only concern seems to be the title of
396:ru:Π’Π΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡ Π½Π° ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΡΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°
381:ru:Π’Π΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡ Π² ΠΡΠΉΠ½Π°ΠΊΡΠΊΠ΅ (1999)
267:Russian apartment bombings#Ryazan incident
298:Sealing of all materials by Russian Duma
81:
48:. Consensus seems to be that this is a
829:Theories of Russian apartment bombings
807:Theories of Russian apartment bombings
789:Theories of Russian apartment bombings
785:Theories of Russian apartment bombings
683:as per nom and DGG. This is a classic
500:Theories of Russian apartment bombings
453:Theories of Russian apartment bombings
449:Theories of Russian apartment bombings
431:Theories of Russian apartment bombings
419:Theories of Russian apartment bombings
342:Theories of Russian apartment bombings
255:Theories of Russian apartment bombings
229:Theories of Russian apartment bombings
386:ru:Π’Π΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡ Π² ΠΠΎΠ»Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ½ΡΠΊΠ΅
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
737:, per Biophys and per previous AfD
219:1. This is a textbook example of a
80:
24:
311:Obstruction of Kovalev commission
447:A lot of duplicated content in
285:Incident in Russian Parliament
1:
915:22:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
896:14:09, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
878:09:25, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
845:06:37, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
823:06:33, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
801:06:16, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
775:05:57, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
726:06:12, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
68:01:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
704:11:33, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
674:00:42, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
637:19:06, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
618:16:33, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
598:16:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
578:09:13, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
555:06:42, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
512:17:29, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
492:02:30, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
469:02:24, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
443:01:48, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
412:01:30, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
354:17:41, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
953:
375:on this subject in ruwiki:
364:Russian apartment bombings
338:Russian apartment bombings
251:Russian apartment bombings
225:Russian apartment bombings
333:...et cetera, et cetera.
929:Please do not modify it.
272:Explosives controversies
237:9/11 conspiracy theories
32:Please do not modify it.
882:And how about deleting
362:. The original article
79:AfDs for this article:
884:Evidence of evolution
588:? Can you elaborate?
242:2. The article fails
831:, so I moved it to
661:conspiracy theories
535:Operation Sarindar
44:The result was
543:Nuclear terrorism
539:Nuclear terrorism
944:
931:
907:PasswordUsername
870:PasswordUsername
712:Please abide by
313:is available at
265:is available at
213:
212:
198:
146:
140:
122:
63:
34:
952:
951:
947:
946:
945:
943:
942:
941:
940:
934:deletion review
927:
263:Ryazan incident
155:
142:
113:
97:
94:
77:
61:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
950:
948:
939:
938:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
778:
777:
731:
730:
729:
728:
707:
706:
677:
676:
656:
655:
639:
620:
601:
600:
581:
580:
564:As per policy
558:
557:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
478:and especialy
400:
399:
393:
388:
383:
377:
376:
331:
330:
317:
308:
295:
282:
269:
259:
258:
247:
240:
216:
215:
152:
93:
92:
91:
86:
78:
76:
71:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
949:
937:
935:
930:
924:
923:
916:
912:
908:
904:
903:
899:
898:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
880:
879:
875:
871:
867:
863:
859:
856:
855:
846:
842:
838:
835:. Happy now?
834:
830:
826:
825:
824:
820:
816:
812:
808:
804:
803:
802:
798:
794:
790:
786:
782:
781:
780:
779:
776:
772:
768:
764:
760:
756:
752:
748:
744:
740:
736:
733:
732:
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
710:
709:
708:
705:
702:
698:
694:
690:
686:
682:
679:
678:
675:
671:
667:
662:
658:
657:
652:
647:
643:
640:
638:
634:
630:
629:
624:
621:
619:
615:
611:
606:
603:
602:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
582:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
560:
559:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
525:
524:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
472:
471:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
445:
444:
440:
436:
432:
429:content from
428:
424:
420:
416:
415:
414:
413:
409:
405:
397:
394:
392:
389:
387:
384:
382:
379:
378:
374:
369:
365:
361:
358:
357:
356:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
334:
329:
325:
324:word-for-word
322:is available
321:
318:
316:
312:
309:
307:
303:
302:word-for-word
300:is available
299:
296:
294:
290:
289:word-for-word
287:is available
286:
283:
281:
277:
276:word-for-word
274:is available
273:
270:
268:
264:
261:
260:
256:
252:
248:
245:
241:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
217:
211:
207:
204:
201:
197:
193:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
161:
158:
157:Find sources:
153:
150:
145:
138:
134:
130:
126:
121:
117:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
95:
90:
87:
85:
82:
75:
72:
70:
69:
66:
64:
57:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
928:
925:
900:
857:
810:
741:rational by
738:
734:
696:
689:User:Biophys
680:
645:
641:
626:
622:
604:
584:Per what in
561:
547:Vlad fedorov
526:
456:
426:
401:
373:sub-articles
372:
359:
335:
332:
323:
319:
310:
301:
297:
288:
284:
275:
271:
262:
205:
199:
191:
184:
178:
172:
166:
156:
58:
54:
45:
43:
31:
28:
862:WP:POV fork
687:created by
666:Anarchangel
651:WP:DELETION
570:DragonFly31
182:free images
685:WP:POVFORK
610:Drawn Some
531:WP:POVFORK
480:WP:POVFORK
427:duplicates
423:WP:POVFORK
221:WP:POVFORK
902:Evolution
805:Actually
654:attempts.
425:) simply
837:Offliner
815:Martintg
811:evidence
793:Offliner
767:Martintg
718:Martintg
701:Russavia
590:Offliner
484:Offliner
435:Offliner
346:Offliner
244:WP:SYNTH
149:View log
50:POV fork
888:Biophys
642:Comment
504:Biophys
476:WP:NPOV
461:Biophys
404:Biophys
188:WPΒ refs
176:scholar
116:protect
111:history
858:Delete
763:WP:MOS
747:others
743:myself
739:"keep"
714:WP:AGF
681:Delete
623:Delete
605:Delete
586:WP:MOS
566:WP:MOS
527:Delete
455:. But
368:WP:MOS
160:Google
144:delete
120:delete
46:delete
695:. As
633:talk
235:from
203:JSTOR
164:books
147:) β (
137:views
129:watch
125:links
16:<
911:talk
892:talk
874:talk
841:talk
819:talk
797:talk
771:talk
759:here
757:and
755:here
751:here
745:and
735:Keep
722:talk
716:. --
670:talk
614:talk
594:talk
574:talk
562:Keep
551:talk
529:per
508:talk
488:talk
465:talk
439:talk
408:talk
360:Keep
350:talk
253:and
227:and
196:FENS
170:news
133:logs
107:talk
103:edit
62:Talk
691:to
628:DGG
568:.--
326:at
304:at
291:at
278:at
210:TWL
913:)
894:)
876:)
868:?
843:)
821:)
799:)
773:)
753:,
749:,
724:)
672:)
646:by
635:)
616:)
596:)
576:)
553:)
541:.
510:)
490:)
482:?
467:)
441:)
410:)
352:)
190:)
135:|
131:|
127:|
123:|
118:|
114:|
109:|
105:|
55:NW
52:.
909:(
890:(
872:(
839:(
817:(
795:(
769:(
720:(
668:(
631:(
612:(
592:(
572:(
549:(
506:(
486:(
463:(
459:.
437:(
406:(
398:.
348:(
340:(
214:)
206:Β·
200:Β·
192:Β·
185:Β·
179:Β·
173:Β·
167:Β·
162:(
154:(
151:)
141:(
139:)
101:(
65:)
59:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.