226:
140:
25 page views a day is not notable, considering that some of those hits might be from
Knowledge (XXG) editors reviewing it for the AfD vote. Should that number rapidly increase over the next year, then the article can have another look. Otherwise, there are MySpace pages with more pageviews, and
100:
Despite being less than a month old, and having virtually no advertising whatsoever, this site has averaged about 25 page views a day for the past week (ON home page only) and that number is rapidly increasing. It will eventually be very popular, hopefully.--
120:. This may become the most popular website of all time. It may fade away into obscurity. Right now it's a brand new site with very few viewers. Right now it does not meet
88:
being listed on website directories isn't a sign of notability. As that is stated upfront, I imagine that is the only claim to notability this site can even make.
17:
269:
257:
243:
214:
187:
175:
159:
145:
128:
92:
79:
60:
287:
36:
66:
155:
I agree with the above statement. 25 hits a day isn't notable. Nor is
Knowledge (XXG) for advertising websites.
286:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
52:
233:
124:. If that changes, the article may be recreated in the future once it has achieved notability.
254:
142:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
121:
117:
105:
196:
57:
49:
266:
156:
125:
89:
238:
230:
184:
172:
76:
225:
265:, per Fan1967. First notability, then Knowledge (XXG), please. --
280:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
141:
the article and topic as it stands now is non-notable. --
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
290:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
118:Knowledge (XXG) is not a crystal ball
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
224:
103:This unsigned remark was left by
1:
195:25 hits a day = not notable.
44:The result of the debate was
67:Evil Fluffy Bunnies of Doom
307:
283:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
270:06:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
258:16:54, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
244:12:33, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
215:23:29, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
188:21:48, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
176:21:31, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
160:21:46, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
146:21:17, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
129:22:09, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
93:20:36, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
80:20:26, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
61:23:03, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
75:Non-notable website
183:, as per nom. --
104:
298:
285:
236:
228:
212:
209:
206:
203:
102:
55:
34:
306:
305:
301:
300:
299:
297:
296:
295:
294:
288:deletion review
281:
234:
210:
207:
204:
201:
70:
53:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
304:
302:
293:
292:
275:
273:
272:
260:
218:
217:
197:Andrew Lenahan
190:
178:
166:
165:
164:
163:
162:
134:
133:
132:
131:
109:
108:
95:
69:
64:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
303:
291:
289:
284:
278:
277:
276:
271:
268:
264:
261:
259:
256:
252:
249:
248:
247:
246:
245:
241:
240:
237:
232:
227:
222:
216:
213:
198:
194:
191:
189:
186:
182:
179:
177:
174:
170:
167:
161:
158:
154:
151:
150:
149:
148:
147:
144:
139:
136:
135:
130:
127:
123:
119:
116:
113:
112:
111:
110:
107:
99:
96:
94:
91:
87:
84:
83:
82:
81:
78:
74:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
282:
279:
274:
262:
255:DJ Clayworth
250:
242:
229:
220:
219:
200:
192:
180:
168:
152:
143:Ataricodfish
137:
114:
97:
85:
72:
71:
45:
43:
31:
28:
98:Speedy Keep
253:As above.
106:Smartyshoe
267:ReyBrujo
157:IrishGuy
90:IrishGuy
185:JeremyA
153:comment
126:Fan1967
115:Comment
58:ng Aili
263:Delete
251:Delete
223:nn. --
221:Delete
193:Delete
181:Delete
169:Delete
138:Delete
122:WP:WEB
86:Delete
73:Delete
46:Delete
173:Shuki
77:Typos
16:<
231:Srik
48:. --
208:bli
239:it
211:nd
205:ar
202:St
199:-
171:--
235:e
54:a
50:F
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
