Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Expert Drones - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

978:: Like many of the other contributors here, I disagree with ahunts comments, except that the article should reduce a few of the sources where the links only providing passing mention. Outside of that, there are plenty of sources here that describe the company. The article should be kept based on publicity around the general subject as well. If the article wants to add more to it, they can also reference the org website or manufacturer's website as this seems to be ok with ahunt for sources based on previous article he/she has contributed to regarding aircraft. Also, When I looked up the ISPs they resolve to different locations spanning across the U.S., so the odds of WP:COI is low. Still makes sense to keep this one up, but make a note that deletion may be required if articles without sources are deleted. 401: 949:: My comments stands, there are no sources that profile the company at all here. All sources are just passing mentions, like this one that says the company was at a show, or quoting the CEO on general information about drones. There are no third parties sources on which to base an article. I have to also mention that the number of IPs who pop up here and make their very first edit as a "keep", is a concern that there are 80: 1200: 844: 329:
Expert Drones appears notable and the company seems to be a mover and shaker in the drone market. This article should be kept as they are making a name for themselves in the new drone industry. It is worth keeping it because there will be a lot more information about this company coming out with some
454:
based on multiple news sources citing company's contribution to the drone industry and when discussing drone regulatory requirements. One example is the 10-15 minute interview by ABC news. Article could include additional info about company operations to expand, but meets minimum standards for
786:: Actually it isn't met. If you read the actual third party refs none of them profile the company. They are mostly interviews with the CEO about the nature of drones in general, not about the company. If we had to rely on the third party refs for the article we would only have one sentence. - 910:
ahunt seemsto not realize that there are verified sources here. This company is one of the few drone companies I have had the opportunity to read about. With FAA regulations coming it is great to understand the history of existing drone companies and their impact. I vote to keep.
429:: The refs cited only interview the company CEO on regulatory issues, there is no significant coverage of the company itself, its history, operations, etc. There isn't enough here from non-primary refs to sustain an article. The article creator looks like a 316:
PROD was removed by article creator. While at first glance there does seem to be coverage for the company, they all consist of "interviews with employees", which isn't exactly what you would call independent coverage.
285: 649: 767: 748: 330:
of the investment capital they have raised and activities occurring in the entertainment industry about their founders, which will be added when that information is released to the public.
1114: 1014:: Which cited refs have a profile of the company? I am not seeing that. As far as your argument, "the article should be kept based on publicity around the general subject as well" goes see 893:: Getting kind of desperate here, aren't we? That ref makes one passing mention that the CEO attended a show, still no profile of the company at all - nothing to base an article on. - 676: 87: 238: 380:
got the bare minimum coverage but if it doesn't get more sources it should be up for deletion again sooner rather than later .Also is one of the more notable drone marketplaces
516:- Can you point out the "multiple" news sources? Specifically, I am wondering about the ones that talk about the company in depth, not just interviews or passing mentions. -- 1174: 1154: 1134: 1094: 279: 1207: 1015: 245: 582:. Can you point out the coverage you say proves it is a "big player?" I cannot locate anything, including what is already in the article. -- 96: 931: 912: 1004: 837: 481: 369: 126: 761: 752: 17: 211: 206: 1018:. Basically just because "drones" are a popular subject does not make a specific company notable. As far as other articles go, see 860: 833: 757: 365: 346: 215: 1000: 746:
that states: "multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability". Multiple sources are cited in this case.
477: 198: 300: 112: 267: 1019: 625: 1257: 40: 85:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
879: 158: 1233: 385: 261: 925: 916: 408: 334: 142: 116: 1238: 1219: 1186: 1166: 1146: 1126: 1106: 1085: 1067: 1031: 987: 966: 940: 902: 820: 795: 776: 724: 695: 668: 640: 616: 591: 571: 550: 546: 525: 464: 442: 417: 389: 350: 321: 318: 257: 63: 61: 1076: 1044: 743: 739: 707: 602: 579: 538: 101: 1253: 921: 636: 202: 36: 1083: 1075:: searches suggest that significant coverage in independent, reliable sources sufficient to meet the 938: 856: 829: 816: 811:. Just ran a search and found another news source mentioning Expert Drones at an event in Las Vegas. 774: 415: 361: 342: 307: 1228: 381: 293: 194: 69: 996: 983: 719: 587: 567: 521: 473: 460: 148: 79: 1182: 1162: 1142: 1122: 1102: 542: 54: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1252:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1048: 950: 808: 735: 559: 451: 430: 273: 1215: 1080: 1053: 1027: 962: 935: 898: 852: 825: 812: 791: 771: 438: 412: 357: 338: 400: 992: 979: 711: 681: 654: 606: 583: 563: 517: 469: 456: 601:- despite the numerous SPA !votes, searches do not turn up enough to show it passes 1178: 1158: 1138: 1118: 1098: 500: 176: 164: 132: 232: 111:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
934:) has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and AFD. 770:) has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and AFD. 541:, not really surprising considering the four-store chain only opened this year. 1211: 1023: 958: 894: 880:
http://www.eventmarketer.com/article/eventtech-2015-everything-missed-day-one/
787: 434: 558:- Unfortunately, there are not enough in depth source that can establish 954: 1246:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
74: 650:
list of United States of America-related deletion discussions
628:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
105:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, 605:(Clarityfriend's point is pretty clear - no pun intended). 1043:
I couldn't find enough reliable coverage to make it pass
95:
among Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has
957:
all traces them to the same couple of US-based ISPs. -
228: 224: 220: 292: 1115:
list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions
634:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 306: 1208:Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/Velic02c 677:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 1260:). No further edits should be made to this page. 578:A local station in D.C. does not really satisfy 501:http://wjla.com/news/news-talk/drone-regulations 1175:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 1155:list of Business-related deletion discussions 1135:list of Aviation-related deletion discussions 1095:list of Virginia-related deletion discussions 125:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected 8: 1227:for now until a better article can be made. 1173:Note: This debate has been included in the 1153:Note: This debate has been included in the 1133:Note: This debate has been included in the 1113:Note: This debate has been included in the 1093:Note: This debate has been included in the 742:is met based on the guidelines described in 675:Note: This debate has been included in the 648:Note: This debate has been included in the 407:Struck above comment from blocked sock per 1172: 1152: 1132: 1112: 1092: 920: 756: 674: 647: 99:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and 1197:. Velic02c, Jdwicker12, and Btalred1 are 119:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. 872: 493: 758:2601:14D:8200:728B:9422:E95F:C11B:C37B 749:2601:14D:8200:728B:9422:E95F:C11B:C37B 455:notability based on sources provided. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 433:case here to promote the company. - 734:, articles are enough to establish 24: 863:) has already cast a vote above. 1198: 842: 399: 78: 1016:WP:Notability is not inherited 919:) 23:52, 6 November 2015 (UTC) 755:) 21:10, 5 November 2015 (UTC) 1: 1239:20:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC) 1220:19:49, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 1195:Note to closing administrator 1187:16:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 1167:16:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 1147:16:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 1127:16:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 1107:16:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 1086:16:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 1068:12:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC) 1032:01:24, 10 November 2015 (UTC) 941:16:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 777:16:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 418:16:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 115:on the part of others and to 64:04:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC) 988:22:58, 8 November 2015 (UTC) 967:00:08, 7 November 2015 (UTC) 903:21:21, 5 November 2015 (UTC) 821:21:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC) 796:21:15, 5 November 2015 (UTC) 725:17:33, 5 November 2015 (UTC) 696:16:10, 5 November 2015 (UTC) 669:16:10, 5 November 2015 (UTC) 641:15:40, 5 November 2015 (UTC) 617:13:29, 5 November 2015 (UTC) 592:23:03, 31 October 2015 (UTC) 572:00:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC) 551:00:30, 29 October 2015 (UTC) 526:00:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC) 465:22:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC) 443:21:33, 28 October 2015 (UTC) 390:18:17, 28 October 2015 (UTC) 351:18:13, 28 October 2015 (UTC) 322:14:49, 28 October 2015 (UTC) 1277: 1249:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 157:; accounts blocked for 127:single-purpose accounts 97:policies and guidelines 450:clearly meets minimum 1005:few or no other edits 838:few or no other edits 482:few or no other edits 370:few or no other edits 1007:outside this topic. 840:outside this topic. 484:outside this topic. 372:outside this topic. 1020:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS 809:Knowledge (XXG):GNG 109:by counting votes. 88:not a majority vote 1189: 1169: 1149: 1129: 1109: 1008: 943: 864: 841: 779: 723: 715: 698: 671: 643: 485: 373: 354: 337:comment added by 319:Narutolovehinata5 190: 189: 186: 113:assume good faith 1268: 1251: 1236: 1231: 1202: 1201: 1064: 1061: 1060: 1056: 990: 953:issues at play. 882: 877: 847: 846: 845: 823: 738:. Additionally, 717: 713: 691: 688: 685: 664: 661: 658: 639: 633: 631: 629: 613: 610: 503: 498: 467: 420: 403: 355: 353: 331: 311: 310: 296: 248: 236: 218: 184: 172: 156: 140: 121: 91:, but instead a 82: 75: 57: 34: 1276: 1275: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1258:deletion review 1247: 1234: 1229: 1199: 1079:are not found. 1062: 1058: 1057: 1054: 887: 886: 885: 878: 874: 850:Duplicate vote: 843: 689: 686: 683: 662: 659: 656: 644: 635: 624: 622: 611: 608: 508: 507: 506: 499: 495: 398: 332: 253: 244: 209: 193: 174: 162: 146: 130: 117:sign your posts 73: 55: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1274: 1272: 1263: 1262: 1242: 1241: 1230:SwisterTwister 1222: 1191: 1190: 1170: 1150: 1130: 1110: 1089: 1088: 1070: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 973: 972: 971: 970: 969: 884: 883: 871: 870: 866: 799: 798: 728: 727: 700: 699: 672: 632: 621: 620: 619: 595: 594: 575: 574: 553: 531: 530: 529: 528: 505: 504: 492: 491: 487: 424: 423: 422: 421: 382:TypingInTheSky 314: 313: 250: 188: 187: 83: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1273: 1261: 1259: 1255: 1250: 1244: 1243: 1240: 1237: 1232: 1226: 1223: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1196: 1193: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1171: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1151: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1131: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1111: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1091: 1090: 1087: 1084: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1071: 1069: 1066: 1065: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1039: 1038: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1010: 1009: 1006: 1002: 998: 994: 989: 985: 981: 977: 974: 968: 964: 960: 956: 952: 948: 945: 944: 942: 939: 937: 933: 930: 927: 923: 922:166.171.59.74 918: 914: 913:166.171.59.74 909: 906: 905: 904: 900: 896: 892: 889: 888: 881: 876: 873: 869: 865: 862: 858: 854: 851: 839: 835: 831: 827: 822: 818: 814: 810: 806: 804: 797: 793: 789: 785: 782: 781: 780: 778: 775: 773: 769: 766: 763: 759: 754: 750: 747: 745: 741: 737: 733: 726: 721: 716: 709: 705: 702: 701: 697: 694: 693: 692: 678: 673: 670: 667: 666: 665: 651: 646: 645: 642: 638: 637:North America 630: 627: 618: 615: 614: 604: 600: 597: 596: 593: 589: 585: 581: 577: 576: 573: 569: 565: 561: 557: 554: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 533: 532: 527: 523: 519: 515: 512: 511: 510: 509: 502: 497: 494: 490: 486: 483: 479: 475: 471: 466: 462: 458: 453: 449: 445: 444: 440: 436: 432: 428: 419: 416: 414: 410: 409:WP:SOCKSTRIKE 406: 402: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 387: 383: 379: 374: 371: 367: 363: 359: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 328: 324: 323: 320: 309: 305: 302: 299: 295: 291: 287: 284: 281: 278: 275: 272: 269: 266: 263: 259: 256: 255:Find sources: 251: 247: 243: 240: 234: 230: 226: 222: 217: 213: 208: 204: 200: 196: 195:Expert Drones 192: 191: 182: 178: 170: 166: 160: 154: 150: 144: 138: 134: 128: 124: 120: 118: 114: 108: 104: 103: 98: 94: 90: 89: 84: 81: 77: 76: 71: 70:Expert Drones 68: 66: 65: 62: 59: 58: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 1248: 1245: 1224: 1203: 1194: 1077:WP:CORPDEPTH 1072: 1052: 1045:WP:CORPDEPTH 1040: 1011: 975: 946: 928: 907: 890: 875: 867: 849: 802: 801: 800: 783: 764: 744:WP:CORPDEPTH 740:WP:CORPDEPTH 731: 730: 729: 708:WP:CORPDEPTH 703: 682: 680: 655: 653: 623: 607: 603:WP:CORPDEPTH 598: 580:WP:CORPDEPTH 555: 543:Clarityfiend 539:WP:CORPDEPTH 537:for failing 534: 513: 496: 488: 447: 446: 426: 425: 404: 377: 376: 375: 333:— Preceding 326: 325: 315: 303: 297: 289: 282: 276: 270: 264: 254: 241: 180: 168: 159:sockpuppetry 152: 141:; suspected 136: 122: 110: 106: 100: 92: 86: 56:Juliancolton 53: 49: 47: 31: 28: 1206:socks. See 1003:) has made 836:) has made 480:) has made 368:) has made 280:free images 1081:Sam Sailor 936:Sam Sailor 868:References 853:Jdwicker12 826:Jdwicker12 813:Jdwicker12 772:Sam Sailor 489:References 413:Sam Sailor 358:Jdwicker12 339:Jdwicker12 93:discussion 1254:talk page 1204:Confirmed 1179:• Gene93k 1159:• Gene93k 1139:• Gene93k 1119:• Gene93k 1099:• Gene93k 149:canvassed 143:canvassed 102:consensus 37:talk page 1256:or in a 1047:. Fails 1001:contribs 993:Btalred1 980:Btalred1 932:contribs 861:contribs 834:contribs 807:, Meets 768:contribs 714:VVERTYVS 706:, fails 626:Relisted 584:CNMall41 564:CNMall41 518:CNMall41 478:contribs 470:Btalred1 457:Btalred1 366:contribs 347:contribs 335:unsigned 239:View log 181:username 175:{{subst: 169:username 163:{{subst: 153:username 147:{{subst: 137:username 131:{{subst: 39:or in a 1012:Comment 976:Comment 947:Comment 908:Comment 891:Comment 805:Comment 784:Comment 514:Comment 286:WP refs 274:scholar 212:protect 207:history 145:users: 1225:Delete 1073:Delete 1049:WP:ORG 1041:Delete 951:WP:COI 736:WP:GNG 704:Delete 599:Delete 560:WP:GNG 556:Delete 535:Delete 452:WP:GNG 431:WP:COI 427:Delete 258:Google 216:delete 50:delete 1212:Bbb23 1024:Ahunt 959:Ahunt 955:Whois 895:Ahunt 788:Ahunt 435:Ahunt 405:Note: 301:JSTOR 262:books 246:Stats 233:views 225:watch 221:links 123:Note: 52:. – 16:< 1235:talk 1216:talk 1183:talk 1163:talk 1143:talk 1123:talk 1103:talk 1028:talk 1022:. - 997:talk 984:talk 963:talk 926:talk 917:talk 899:talk 857:talk 830:talk 817:talk 803:Keep 792:talk 762:talk 753:talk 732:Keep 679:. — 652:. — 612:5969 609:Onel 588:talk 568:talk 547:talk 522:talk 474:talk 461:talk 448:Keep 439:talk 386:talk 378:Keep 362:talk 343:talk 327:Keep 294:FENS 268:news 229:logs 203:talk 199:edit 1210:.-- 1063:ter 1059:Car 1055:Jim 720:hm? 687:ska 684:San 660:ska 657:San 562:.-- 308:TWL 237:– ( 177:csp 173:or 165:csm 133:spa 107:not 1218:) 1185:) 1177:. 1165:) 1157:. 1145:) 1137:. 1125:) 1117:. 1105:) 1097:. 1051:. 1030:) 999:• 991:— 986:) 965:) 901:) 859:• 848:— 832:• 824:— 819:) 794:) 710:. 690:ri 663:ri 590:) 570:) 549:) 524:) 476:• 468:— 463:) 441:) 411:- 388:) 364:• 356:— 349:) 345:• 288:) 231:| 227:| 223:| 219:| 214:| 210:| 205:| 201:| 183:}} 171:}} 161:: 155:}} 139:}} 129:: 60:| 1214:( 1181:( 1161:( 1141:( 1121:( 1101:( 1026:( 995:( 982:( 961:( 929:· 924:( 915:( 897:( 855:( 828:( 815:( 790:( 765:· 760:( 751:( 722:) 718:( 712:Q 586:( 566:( 545:( 520:( 472:( 459:( 437:( 384:( 360:( 341:( 312:) 304:· 298:· 290:· 283:· 277:· 271:· 265:· 260:( 252:( 249:) 242:· 235:) 197:( 185:. 179:| 167:| 151:| 135:|

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Juliancolton

04:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Expert Drones
Not a vote
not a majority vote
policies and guidelines
consensus
assume good faith
sign your posts
single-purpose accounts
spa
canvassed
canvassed
sockpuppetry
csm
csp
Expert Drones
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.