Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Eyeshine (band) (2nd nomination) - Knowledge

Source 📝

318:. awards are not major. having a notable actor as part of the band does not make them notable. the article has a lot of references but none are significant coverage in independent reliable sources. convention announcements are not independent. kroq ref is just them talking about themselves. facebook and twitter are not reliable. Boston Bastard Brigade shows no sign of being reliable. AMP Magazine shows no sign of being reliable and the coverage is trivial. I only found passing mentions, nothing significant. 424:
disapointments, discouragments and transform it into motivation for fuel to keep you going and you can eventually succeed. It just matters how far you are willing to go. I am still on my road of discouragments but I am looking for a detour. And that knowledge is what I gained from talking to each of the band members. It's not about being popular, But connecting with people, and talking to the fans. Please Knowledge don't make the mistake of erasing this unique part of history.
69: 423:
Eyeshine should have it's name in history for future musicians as inspiration to not give up when others are trying to discourage or intimidate them. In my opinion I had the honor to speak with them. My whole perspective on job, intern, and career searching changed. When you are rejected take all the
474:
If you're really interested in saving this Knowledge page, the best thing you can do for it is finding articles ABOUT Eyeshine and adding the CITED information to the page to make it more credible. I myself made most of the page as you see it now and I made it that way by adding information from
603:. They have a devoted local following, have performed all over the country and even done some shows internationally. EYESHINE is poised to follow other local area bands that recently shot to stardom with their edgy sound. Yes, 283: 533:
Matt is totally correct, the band has come a long way, it has churned out several albums and has worked equally as hard as multiple other bands out there. You say they are non-notable? What about Drive-By Argument?
579:. Just because we have a noncompliant page doesn't mean it's okay to make noncompliant pages; it just means administrators (of whom there are proportionately very few) haven't gotten around to deleting it yet. — 190: 538:) Yes, they played T in The Park: once. What makes them notable? Their page shouldn't have a place here if Eyeshine doesn't. Also, I don't have anything against Drive-By Argument, just an example. 358: 607:, band co-founder and lead singer has a prominent career as a voice and on-camera actor, but this is separate from EYESHINE the band. Merging the two pages doesn't make sense. Other than 76: 277: 244: 185: 617:
a notable enough indy band to warrant its own article. They have six albums on iTunes and a behind-the-scenes web series, The EYESHINE Experience
217: 212: 221: 559: 545: 85: 692: 673: 640: 586: 553: 524: 504: 484: 444: 402: 372: 349: 327: 52: 683:- unremarkable band. Little significant coverage, minor awards of questionable notability (and mostly nominations only, at that). 298: 659: 567: 463: 204: 115: 265: 17: 655: 636: 459: 440: 576: 101: 259: 340:
opposed to deletion. A good amount of the band's information could be summarized on Bosch's page as it already is.
74:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
707: 36: 255: 706:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
480: 345: 323: 563: 549: 305: 688: 208: 147: 651: 632: 597: 624: 541: 519: 428: 131: 105: 600: 647: 628: 451: 432: 291: 90: 476: 455: 436: 398: 341: 319: 271: 137: 68: 684: 604: 368: 337: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
611:
himself, there is no overlap or common thread between these two entities. Moreover, EYESHINE
383: 513: 315: 200: 58: 490: 394: 596:- EYESHINE has either made the finals or won several independent band competitions 494: 364: 165: 153: 121: 49: 238: 100:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
618: 386:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
666:
Hits on YouTube do not correlate to notability, and nor do name-drops. —
416:
please edit and leave comments below mine. keep a backup of your comment
512:- deeply non-notable band; should have been deleted the last time. -- 535: 598:
http://www.ampmagazine.com/10956/amp-unsigned-band-contest-part-iv/
608: 577:
Article X's presence or absence can't be used to justify Article Y
601:
http://www.987fm.com/pages/rockstar09/page-rockstar09vidsnew3.php
700:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
63: 94:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, 359:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
493:
for the purpose you're trying to use it for. We are an
234: 230: 226: 290: 191:
Articles for deletion/Eyeshine (band) (2nd nomination)
393:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 710:). No further edits should be made to this page. 304: 114:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected 84:among Knowledge contributors. Knowledge has 8: 357:Note: This debate has been included in the 356: 88:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and 536:http://en.wikipedia.org/Drive-by_Argument 108:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. 183: 314:this band does not appear to satisfy 186:Articles for deletion/Eyeshine (band) 7: 182: 24: 475:articles I had read about them. 67: 620:garnering thousands of views. 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 104:on the part of others and to 693:13:07, 4 November 2011 (UTC) 674:19:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC) 641:00:20, 3 November 2011 (UTC) 587:19:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC) 554:00:12, 3 November 2011 (UTC) 525:19:11, 31 October 2011 (UTC) 505:16:35, 31 October 2011 (UTC) 485:12:10, 31 October 2011 (UTC) 445:05:24, 31 October 2011 (UTC) 403:08:04, 29 October 2011 (UTC) 373:16:16, 22 October 2011 (UTC) 350:11:36, 22 October 2011 (UTC) 328:04:28, 22 October 2011 (UTC) 53:06:06, 6 November 2011 (UTC) 727: 703:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 146:; accounts blocked for 116:single-purpose accounts 86:policies and guidelines 181:AfDs for this article: 660:few or no other edits 568:few or no other edits 497:first and foremost. — 464:few or no other edits 662:outside this topic. 570:outside this topic. 489:Note that Knowledge 466:outside this topic. 98:by counting votes. 77:not a majority vote 44:The result was 663: 644: 627:comment added by 605:Johnny Yong Bosch 571: 544:comment added by 467: 448: 431:comment added by 417: 405: 375: 362: 338:Johnny Yong Bosch 179: 178: 175: 102:assume good faith 718: 705: 672: 645: 643: 621: 585: 557: 556: 522: 516: 503: 449: 447: 425: 415: 392: 388: 363: 309: 308: 294: 242: 224: 173: 161: 145: 129: 110: 80:, but instead a 71: 64: 34: 726: 725: 721: 720: 719: 717: 716: 715: 714: 708:deletion review 701: 667: 622: 580: 539: 520: 514: 498: 426: 413: 381: 251: 215: 201:Eyeshine (band) 199: 196: 163: 151: 135: 119: 106:sign your posts 62: 59:Eyeshine (band) 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 724: 722: 713: 712: 696: 695: 678: 677: 676: 590: 589: 528: 527: 507: 487: 412: 409: 408: 407: 406: 390: 389: 378: 377: 376: 353: 352: 312: 311: 248: 195: 194: 193: 188: 180: 177: 176: 72: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 723: 711: 709: 704: 698: 697: 694: 690: 686: 682: 679: 675: 670: 665: 664: 661: 657: 653: 649: 642: 638: 634: 630: 626: 619: 616: 615: 610: 606: 602: 599: 595: 592: 591: 588: 583: 578: 574: 573: 572: 569: 565: 561: 555: 551: 547: 543: 537: 531: 526: 523: 517: 511: 508: 506: 501: 496: 492: 488: 486: 482: 478: 477:FallenWings47 473: 470: 469: 468: 465: 461: 457: 453: 446: 442: 438: 434: 430: 421: 418: 411:Save Eyeshine 410: 404: 400: 396: 391: 387: 385: 380: 379: 374: 370: 366: 360: 355: 354: 351: 347: 343: 342:FallenWings47 339: 335: 332: 331: 330: 329: 325: 321: 320:duffbeerforme 317: 307: 303: 300: 297: 293: 289: 285: 282: 279: 276: 273: 270: 267: 264: 261: 257: 254: 253:Find sources: 249: 246: 240: 236: 232: 228: 223: 219: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 197: 192: 189: 187: 184: 171: 167: 159: 155: 149: 143: 139: 133: 127: 123: 117: 113: 109: 107: 103: 97: 93: 92: 87: 83: 79: 78: 73: 70: 66: 65: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 702: 699: 685:MikeWazowski 680: 668: 623:— Preceding 613: 612: 593: 581: 540:— Preceding 532: 530:Jack Newell 529: 509: 499: 495:encyclopedia 471: 427:— Preceding 422: 420:Matt Osorio 419: 414: 382: 333: 313: 301: 295: 287: 280: 274: 268: 262: 252: 169: 157: 148:sockpuppetry 141: 130:; suspected 125: 111: 99: 95: 89: 81: 75: 45: 43: 31: 28: 658:) has made 575:Sorry, but 566:) has made 560:92.22.25.48 546:92.22.25.48 515:Orange Mike 491:is not here 462:) has made 336:: Merge to 278:free images 82:discussion 365:• Gene93k 138:canvassed 132:canvassed 91:consensus 656:contribs 648:TweetLvr 637:contribs 629:TweetLvr 625:unsigned 542:unsigned 460:contribs 452:Mattvp13 441:contribs 433:Mattvp13 429:unsigned 395:Davewild 384:Relisted 316:wp:music 245:View log 170:username 164:{{subst: 158:username 152:{{subst: 142:username 136:{{subst: 126:username 120:{{subst: 472:COMMENT 284:WP refs 272:scholar 218:protect 213:history 134:users: 50:Spartaz 681:Delete 669:Jeremy 582:Jeremy 510:Delete 500:Jeremy 256:Google 222:delete 46:delete 671:v^_^v 609:Bosch 584:v^_^v 502:v^_^v 334:Merge 299:JSTOR 260:books 239:views 231:watch 227:links 112:Note: 16:< 689:talk 652:talk 633:talk 594:Keep 564:talk 550:talk 521:Talk 481:talk 456:talk 437:talk 399:talk 369:talk 346:talk 324:talk 292:FENS 266:news 235:logs 209:talk 205:edit 306:TWL 243:– ( 166:csp 162:or 154:csm 122:spa 96:not 691:) 654:• 646:— 639:) 635:• 614:IS 558:— 552:) 518:| 483:) 458:• 450:— 443:) 439:• 401:) 371:) 361:. 348:) 326:) 286:) 237:| 233:| 229:| 225:| 220:| 216:| 211:| 207:| 172:}} 160:}} 150:: 144:}} 128:}} 118:: 48:. 687:( 650:( 631:( 562:( 548:( 534:( 479:( 454:( 435:( 397:( 367:( 344:( 322:( 310:) 302:· 296:· 288:· 281:· 275:· 269:· 263:· 258:( 250:( 247:) 241:) 203:( 174:. 168:| 156:| 140:| 124:|

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Spartaz
06:06, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Eyeshine (band)
Not a vote
not a majority vote
policies and guidelines
consensus
assume good faith
sign your posts
single-purpose accounts
spa
canvassed
canvassed
sockpuppetry
csm
csp
Articles for deletion/Eyeshine (band)
Articles for deletion/Eyeshine (band) (2nd nomination)
Eyeshine (band)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.