823:. Now, all of a sudden (also note that this article has existed since 2006, has been edited by several people, is linked to from multiple other articles, and exists in seven other languages), as soon as someone claims that this article isn't consistent with the (very vaguely defined) GNG, that consensus no longer applies? You can keep singing that same old song as often as you want to, but this strange "meets specific guidelines but not the GNG" (though not used explicitly here, that's what it comes down to eventually) I've seen a lot doesn't make sense as long as the former are meant to be a specification of the latter. It's just completely and deliberately disruptive, and I'm honestly disgusted by the fact that no one else trying to find the best solution for these articles.
475:
so is not very hard to even make a better page. Again I understand your point, but you need to see that there are some sports that belong to a football team that can make their own history and deserve to have a page of their own. Im sorry for being kind of annoying but you need to understand my point of view as fan of the team, cheers.
640:
someone produces independent sources for the basketball team that are not just routine sports coverage, then the article can be kept. As for the other sports, some of them look to be lacking in good sources, but that's a discussion for another day. I have no objection to the individual sports teams of this club having articles,
882:
There are now 6 sources for the boxing article--2 from the FC Porto site, 1 from the FC Porto Museum, 1 blog, 1 video, and 1 article about a fighter who happens to train at FC Porto with just a passing mention of the club. There is still no significant independent coverage of the boxing team itself.
949:
I think there may be enough sources to show the basketball team is notable, especially since basketball results are team based. However, boxing is an individual sport and I strongly believe the sources given are inadequate to show the boxing club is notable. I see 3 primary sources, 2 blogs, 2 one
753:
has a lot of pages for their sports that are outdated and I never seen nobody complain, this is just and example because in many clubs the same goes. I will ask again instead of complaining about the pages why don't people work together to improve them? I still think that that's is what Wikipédia is
422:
I understand what you are saying, but if you see other clubs pages like
Sporting CP, SL Benfica or Vitória SC for example, they have separate pages aside from the main page for their other sports, this being in Portugal, because the same happens in pages from spanish or turkish clubs. So i ask again
474:
But the basketball page is an important part of the club heritage. Im a FC Porto fan and since I was little i've seen the basketball team play, there is information about the team in online newspapers or other websites and even about the european competitions that the team participated in Wikipédia
1062:
It seems to me that this discussion has boiled down to the notability of the boxing club rather than the basketball team. Frankly, since this has been posted at the deletion discussions for
Portugal for 3 weeks, I'd say there has been ample time to come up with significant reliable sources and so
729:
I'm afraid this isn't about (common) sense. Every little college team can have articles for each season which consist of nothing else than stats (so much on "routine sports coverage"), while a team which won several national titles and competed at continental level multiple times can be deemed
639:
I would also vote to delete the basketball article as it now stands. I have no idea what it means to be the club boxing champion of
Portugal, so it's hard for me to evaluate the significance of this achievement. However, it is easy for me to evaluate an article with no secondary sources. If
950:
line mentions (one under a video), and an article about an aspiring boxer which gives a passing mention to the club. Even the non independent and questionably reliable sources are just a list of a couple of fighters (juniors mainly) and their results with no real mention of the boxing club.
286:
There are several articles of minor sports affiliates of the larger notable football club most of which do not need their own article. The only reason for existence seems to be template fill. At the most they can be lumped into a single article or even a small section to the main
611:
Reference for what? The bare info of having participated in that competition? This is the kind of trivial info usually not backed up by individual references. I've already included an external link to the FIBA Europe's website, which isn't much but enough to prove at least that.
437:
These articles about other FC Porto sports teams don't have the sources required to meet GNG--especially the two I put up. The boxing club's only source is its own web page and the basketball team's source is a report on one game. This seems like
748:
pages can they do it? There so many other pages that don't have and never will have single reference and nobody puts that into a debate, these sports are notable in
Portugal and everybody that is associated with the club know them. For example
840:
Thanks but I am a bit sad that no one is trying to improve the pages. I'm doing my best but I can't do everything by myself, I hope that you guys decide to maintain the pages we don't go anywhere if we decide to erase instead of improving.
389:
FC Porto (basketball team) is one of the most notable basketball teams in
Portugal and almost every team in the country has it's own page, besides Porto has other sports like handball or roller hockey and each has it's own pages.
166:
542:
several times (note that the database only goes back to 1992). If the national boxing championships can be verified, I'd consider that section notable enough as well. There's no need to overcrowd the main article.
498:
I see the basketball page has one reference - it would help if a few more could be added to the page. In that case the
Basketball page would probably survive. The boxing page has only one primary reference.
537:
There should be a separate discussion for the basketball section if notability is the issue here. And I really fail to see why it is considered non-notable. The club has won the national championship and
730:
non-notable out of sheer ignorance and bureaucratism. More and more I get the impression that the
English wikipedia is just about mirroring the net. I think I'm going to stay away from it.
539:
897:
In the boxing page, the page you say its from the museum its actually from a Porto newspaper not the club but the city itself, but what do you suggest that i put more in the page ?
160:
864:
I have added references to the two pages and I believe that it's enough for now so that in the future more references and articles can be added to improve it over time. Cheers
346:
263:
119:
693:
The boxing article has no independent sources and the basketball's sources are a report on a game and a listing of standings. Neither of these show significant coverage.
583:...). So what solution would you propose: Merge it to the already extensive main article? Cut unreferenced statements? It can't be about just deleting the whole article.
366:
326:
408:
I think the idea is that all those other Porto sports with their own pages should not have their own pages. Individually they have not been shown to be notable.
815:@IP: No, this is about taking our own notability guidelines seriously. There's consensus that, when it comes to sports, having competed at a certain level
233:
228:
237:
819:
means meeting the GNG no matter what. Even an individual player who participated in such competitions (Euroleague, Saporta Cup etc.) would easily pass
783:. Those voting keep simply need to post significant independent coverage. The discussion isn't about their existence, it's about their notability.
220:
597:
Or how about just adding some reliable third party references to the article. If they are a notable sports team that should not be that difficult.
579:
above the notability threshold. It competed at the highest stage possible in
European club basketball, the FIBA Euroleague (though not necessarily
92:
87:
126:
96:
912:
884:
784:
1023:
79:
1041:
715:
has other sports pages so we will have sports that have their own pages and the basketball and boxing teams won't it doenst make sense.
1040:- I suspect the basketball club is notable, but is also suspect reliable sources are in Portuguese language. I have made a request at
181:
711:
The main page already has to much information and if we delete the pages we will have to put that information somewhere else besides
148:
826:@Tesd52: Great, at least that's something. Judging a club's notability in an individual sport generally is a bit tricky, though. --
744:
If we stay out of this then people can do whatever they want to the pages, if tomorrow someone decides to erase all of the other
17:
142:
457:
224:
580:
754:
all about, work together to make better articles and pages so that everyone can haver access to better information.
211:
I am also nominating the following related page because it also lacks significant independent non-routine coverage.
138:
1101:
1044:
for some assistance checking
Portuguese RSs. Can we hold off on deleting until we see if someone there can help?
780:
750:
1110:
1086:
1072:
1053:
1031:
1000:
959:
920:
906:
892:
873:
850:
835:
810:
792:
763:
739:
724:
702:
681:
657:
621:
606:
592:
570:
552:
521:
507:
484:
469:
451:
432:
417:
399:
378:
358:
338:
317:
300:
275:
206:
60:
1129:
916:
888:
788:
40:
512:
I will try my best to make a better page and add more references to it. Thanks for the patience and the advice.
1027:
831:
735:
617:
588:
548:
188:
83:
216:
439:
798:
75:
67:
1125:
820:
678:
36:
1019:
442:
where these other teams are claiming they're notable because they're connected to the football team.
313:
154:
911:"Texto de Museu FC Porto" means the text is from the FC Porto museum regardless of where it appears.
993:
827:
731:
613:
584:
544:
174:
1068:
1049:
955:
926:
898:
865:
842:
802:
755:
716:
653:
513:
495:
476:
424:
391:
374:
354:
334:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1124:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1082:
969:
930:
902:
869:
846:
806:
759:
720:
698:
667:
602:
566:
517:
503:
480:
465:
447:
428:
413:
395:
296:
271:
202:
1106:
309:
980:
57:
1064:
1045:
1013:
951:
649:
645:
370:
350:
330:
254:
113:
1078:
694:
598:
562:
499:
461:
443:
409:
292:
267:
198:
745:
712:
288:
972:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
670:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
197:
Boxing club with no significant independent coverage or claim of notability.
308:
with the main Porto article. Not every part of a sporting club is notable.
1100:
Arguing that the articles should exist because similar articles do is a
1012:
This article does not have the independent reliable sources required by
561:
Still not seeing significant independent coverage for either of these.
1077:
I'll accept the basketball team is notable, but not the boxing team.
1118:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
291:
article. The basketball article is a possible exception.
925:
I've added some more references i believe it is enough.
575:
Ok, let me get this straight: A team of such merits is
250:
246:
242:
109:
105:
101:
173:
883:
I'll admit the basketball article has been improved.
979:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
677:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
347:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
1063:far none have been provided for the boxing club.
460:. These other clubs may need to be changed also.
264:list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1132:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1098:Delete & merge both into the parent article.
423:for you guys to reconsider about this subject.
367:list of Basketball-related deletion discussions
327:list of Portugal-related deletion discussions
187:
8:
365:Note: This debate has been included in the
345:Note: This debate has been included in the
325:Note: This debate has been included in the
262:Note: This debate has been included in the
779:The argument for keeping these amounts to
364:
344:
324:
261:
644:they have the coverage necessary to meet
540:participated in European cup competitions
7:
1042:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Portugal
284:Delete Boxing/Weak keep basketball
24:
801:is this enough to keep the page?
797:I have added references to the
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
61:12:54, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
1:
1111:15:14, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
1087:18:38, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
933:) 00:10 21 August 2014 (UTC)
56:on the basketball article.
1073:17:08, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
1054:12:02, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
1032:17:42, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
1001:15:01, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
960:00:43, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
921:18:52, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
907:19:40, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
893:18:32, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
874:16:40, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
851:12:42, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
836:09:26, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
811:20:50, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
793:19:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
764:19:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
740:15:56, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
725:16:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
703:14:13, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
682:05:14, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
658:21:17, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
622:20:34, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
607:20:09, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
593:19:50, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
571:09:59, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
553:16:26, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
522:19:36, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
508:17:57, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
485:18:49, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
470:13:21, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
452:12:46, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
433:00:59, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
418:16:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
400:17:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
379:13:20, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
359:13:20, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
339:13:20, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
318:11:16, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
301:08:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
276:06:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
207:01:19, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
1149:
751:Sporting Clube de Portugal
1121:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
456:And of course there is
217:F.C. Porto (basketball)
458:WP:Other stuff exists
52:the boxing article,
1102:really bad argument
799:F.C. Porto (boxing)
781:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
76:F.C. Porto (boxing)
68:F.C. Porto (boxing)
306:Redirect and merge
1022:comment added by
1003:
684:
381:
361:
341:
278:
1140:
1123:
1034:
998:
990:
985:
978:
974:
931:User talk:Tesd52
903:User talk:Tesd52
870:User talk:Tesd52
847:User talk:Tesd52
807:User talk:Tesd52
760:User talk:Tesd52
721:User talk:Tesd52
676:
672:
258:
240:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
48:The result was
34:
1148:
1147:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1130:deletion review
1119:
1017:
994:
986:
981:
967:
913:204.126.132.231
885:204.126.132.231
785:204.126.132.231
665:
440:WP:NOTINHERITED
231:
215:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1146:
1144:
1135:
1134:
1114:
1113:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1057:
1056:
1035:
1024:131.118.229.17
1006:
1005:
1004:
976:
975:
964:
963:
962:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
877:
876:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
828:Axolotl Nr.733
824:
821:WP:NBASKETBALL
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
732:Axolotl Nr.733
706:
705:
687:
686:
685:
674:
673:
662:
661:
660:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
614:Axolotl Nr.733
585:Axolotl Nr.733
556:
555:
545:Axolotl Nr.733
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
403:
402:
383:
382:
362:
342:
321:
320:
303:
280:
279:
259:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1145:
1133:
1131:
1127:
1122:
1116:
1115:
1112:
1109:
1108:
1103:
1099:
1096:
1095:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1036:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1015:
1011:
1010:Delete boxing
1008:
1007:
1002:
999:
997:
991:
989:
984:
977:
973:
971:
966:
965:
961:
957:
953:
948:
945:
944:
932:
928:
924:
923:
922:
918:
914:
910:
909:
908:
904:
900:
896:
895:
894:
890:
886:
881:
880:
879:
878:
875:
871:
867:
863:
860:
852:
848:
844:
839:
838:
837:
833:
829:
825:
822:
818:
814:
813:
812:
808:
804:
800:
796:
795:
794:
790:
786:
782:
778:
777:Delete boxing
775:
774:
765:
761:
757:
752:
747:
743:
742:
741:
737:
733:
728:
727:
726:
722:
718:
714:
710:
709:
708:
707:
704:
700:
696:
692:
689:
688:
683:
680:
675:
671:
669:
664:
663:
659:
655:
651:
647:
643:
638:
637:Delete boxing
635:
634:
623:
619:
615:
610:
609:
608:
604:
600:
596:
595:
594:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
573:
572:
568:
564:
560:
559:
558:
557:
554:
550:
546:
541:
536:
533:
532:
523:
519:
515:
511:
510:
509:
505:
501:
497:
494:
486:
482:
478:
473:
472:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
454:
453:
449:
445:
441:
436:
435:
434:
430:
426:
421:
420:
419:
415:
411:
407:
406:
405:
404:
401:
397:
393:
388:
387:Do not delete
385:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
363:
360:
356:
352:
348:
343:
340:
336:
332:
328:
323:
322:
319:
315:
311:
307:
304:
302:
298:
294:
290:
285:
282:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
239:
235:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
213:
212:
209:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
62:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1120:
1117:
1105:
1097:
1037:
1018:— Preceding
1009:
995:
987:
982:
968:
946:
861:
816:
776:
690:
679:NorthAmerica
666:
641:
636:
581:successfully
576:
534:
386:
305:
283:
210:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
54:no consensus
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
691:Delete both
599:Peter Rehse
500:Peter Rehse
462:Peter Rehse
410:Peter Rehse
293:Peter Rehse
268:Peter Rehse
161:free images
746:F.C. Porto
713:F.C. Porto
310:Seasider91
289:F.C. Porto
1126:talk page
371:• Gene93k
351:• Gene93k
331:• Gene93k
58:Lankiveil
37:talk page
1128:or in a
1065:Papaursa
1046:Rikster2
1020:unsigned
970:Relisted
952:Papaursa
668:Relisted
650:Papaursa
120:View log
39:or in a
1038:Request
947:Comment
862:Comment
535:Comment
234:protect
229:history
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
1079:Mdtemp
1014:WP:GNG
996:(talk)
927:Tesd52
899:Tesd52
866:Tesd52
843:Tesd52
817:always
803:Tesd52
756:Tesd52
717:Tesd52
695:Mdtemp
646:WP:GNG
563:Jakejr
514:Tesd52
496:Tesd52
477:Tesd52
444:Jakejr
425:Tesd52
392:Tesd52
238:delete
199:Jakejr
139:Google
97:delete
50:Delete
983:Davey
255:views
247:watch
243:links
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
1083:talk
1069:talk
1050:talk
1028:talk
988:2010
956:talk
917:talk
889:talk
832:talk
789:talk
736:talk
699:talk
654:talk
618:talk
603:talk
589:talk
567:talk
549:talk
518:talk
504:talk
481:talk
466:talk
448:talk
429:talk
414:talk
396:talk
375:talk
355:talk
335:talk
314:talk
297:talk
272:talk
251:logs
225:talk
221:edit
203:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
1107:LHM
1016:.
577:way
189:TWL
118:– (
1104:.
1085:)
1071:)
1052:)
1030:)
992:•
958:)
919:)
905:)
891:)
872:)
849:)
834:)
809:)
791:)
762:)
738:)
723:)
701:)
656:)
648:.
642:if
620:)
612:--
605:)
591:)
569:)
551:)
520:)
506:)
483:)
468:)
450:)
431:)
416:)
398:)
377:)
369:.
357:)
349:.
337:)
329:.
316:)
299:)
274:)
266:.
253:|
249:|
245:|
241:|
236:|
232:|
227:|
223:|
205:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
63:.
1081:(
1067:(
1048:(
1026:(
954:(
929:(
915:(
901:(
887:(
868:(
845:(
830:(
805:(
787:(
758:(
734:(
719:(
697:(
652:(
616:(
601:(
587:(
565:(
547:(
516:(
502:(
479:(
464:(
446:(
427:(
412:(
394:(
373:(
353:(
333:(
312:(
295:(
270:(
257:)
219:(
201:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.