Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Folsom Public Library - Knowledge

Source ๐Ÿ“

254:
city library systems are notable, as are large country systems. Town libraries usually not. (And obviously any particular library can be notable for some reason as an exception, just like anything else.)i On the other hand, if people want to interpret this broadly, on the basis that libraries are intrinsically so important that almost any established one is notable on the basis of its importance to the education of the community, I can't see how a librarian like me would object to it--but, honestly, I don't think we've reached that degree of public understanding quite yet, although I'm pleased to see so many wikipedians think so.ย :).
200:. I added some references. I suspect that the reason the county library's branch was closed was California's Proposition 13 which put limits on local taxes and led to significant cutbacks in local government services. The references show significant coverage, and more can probably be found. It would be helpful to have information about the library's special collections and whether the library's buildings have won any awards. -- 395:
I should have checked that before. If however it were important enough, one could quickly use to to write a proper article. But it isn't-- Folsum, a suburb of Sacramento, is not a county library, but a small city library in a large county. It has 73,000 books; the Sacramento City and County library,
253:
We dont have clear practices here. In general any library will have many inconsequential newspaper or web notices, dealing with events taking place there, and the periodic bond issue as tax rate approvals. --but they don't really speak to notability. In a range of inconsistent decisions here, usually
217:
the references show nothing of notability, local coverage of issues related to funding and expansion. Ones that I'd venture a guess are issues every library faces. I know local ones in two places I've lived have had similar issues and they're not notable either. Closed or not doesn't matter, it
126: 177: 129:, they appear limited to the following: 1) library closure notifications 2) events at the library and 3) voting issues, none of which establish notability for the library. Some of the text, i.e. 118: 152: 218:
doesn't get notability for having been closed. I wold agree that if it's buildings won any awards it might be notable, but I found no evidence of that being the case.
85: 80: 89: 72: 396:
with which it is affiliated, has a total of 1.9 million items. that's just one indicator, but it's representative of importance.
297: 17: 407: 383: 356: 340: 331:
A library is probably more worthy of a WP article than many other things. Article is sourced. No reason to delete.
323: 306: 275: 245: 226: 209: 191: 166: 141: 54: 349: 219: 184: 159: 134: 76: 422: 241: 36: 421:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
336: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
131:
The age, design and limited space of the building no longer sustain the needs of our cityโ€™s growing community.
49: 68: 60: 392: 319: 302: 237: 332: 287: 205: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
379: 315: 292: 403: 371: 201: 269: 106: 262:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
375: 367: 348:
as DGG says above, that consensus is not clear. Existence is not notability.
374:
thresholds in my view as they're hardly 'significant coverage' or in-depth.
133:
appears to be a copyvio but it may be offline as I can't find the source.
398: 314:
Per Eastmain. (This would be a great Johnny Cash parody tune, too!)
415:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
178:
list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions
113: 102: 98: 94: 267:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 391:Essentially all of the article is a copyvio from 236:Seems notable to me. Could certainly be improved. 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 425:). No further edits should be made to this page. 366:Those limited sources don't get this across the 153:list of California-related deletion discussions 8: 176:: This debate has been included in the 151:: This debate has been included in the 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 408:02:57, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 384:01:00, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 357:17:06, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 341:15:56, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 324:13:55, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 307:05:41, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 276:03:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 246:06:52, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 227:05:26, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 210:05:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 192:04:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 167:04:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 142:04:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 55:21:02, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 442: 125:While there are ghits and 418:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 69:Folsom Public Library 61:Folsom Public Library 51:Mizu onna sango15 393:their about us page 288:Folsom, California 44:The result was 389:Delete as copyvio 278: 194: 181: 169: 156: 433: 420: 354: 300: 295: 272: 266: 264: 224: 189: 182: 172: 164: 157: 147: 139: 116: 110: 92: 52: 34: 441: 440: 436: 435: 434: 432: 431: 430: 429: 423:deletion review 416: 350: 298: 293: 270: 260: 238:ChildofMidnight 220: 185: 160: 135: 112: 83: 67: 64: 50: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 439: 437: 428: 427: 411: 410: 386: 361: 360: 359: 333:Northwestgnome 326: 309: 284:Merge/Redirect 280: 279: 265: 257: 256: 255: 248: 231: 230: 229: 195: 170: 123: 122: 63: 58: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 438: 426: 424: 419: 413: 412: 409: 405: 401: 400: 394: 390: 387: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 362: 358: 355: 353: 347: 344: 343: 342: 338: 334: 330: 327: 325: 321: 317: 313: 310: 308: 305: 304: 301: 296: 289: 285: 282: 281: 277: 274: 273: 263: 259: 258: 252: 249: 247: 243: 239: 235: 232: 228: 225: 223: 216: 213: 212: 211: 207: 203: 199: 196: 193: 190: 188: 179: 175: 171: 168: 165: 163: 154: 150: 146: 145: 144: 143: 140: 138: 132: 128: 120: 115: 108: 104: 100: 96: 91: 87: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 65: 62: 59: 57: 56: 53: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 417: 414: 397: 388: 363: 351: 345: 328: 311: 303:(yada, yada) 291: 283: 268: 261: 250: 233: 221: 214: 197: 186: 173: 161: 148: 136: 130: 124: 45: 43: 31: 28: 316:Ecoleetage 127:news hits 202:Eastmain 119:View log 346:Comment 271:MBisanz 251:Comment 215:Comment 86:protect 81:history 376:Nick-D 372:WP:ORG 364:Delete 299:crewer 114:delete 90:delete 352:StarM 222:StarM 187:StarM 162:StarM 137:StarM 117:) โ€“ ( 107:views 99:watch 95:links 16:< 404:talk 380:talk 368:WP:N 337:talk 329:Keep 320:talk 312:Keep 294:brew 242:talk 234:Keep 206:talk 198:Keep 174:Note 149:Note 103:logs 77:talk 73:edit 46:keep 399:DGG 370:or 286:to 183:-- 180:. 158:-- 155:. 48:. โ€” 406:) 382:) 339:) 322:) 290:-- 244:) 208:) 105:| 101:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 79:| 75:| 402:( 378:( 335:( 318:( 240:( 204:( 121:) 111:( 109:) 71:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Mizu onna sango15
21:02, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Folsom Public Library
Folsom Public Library
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
news hits
StarM
04:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
list of California-related deletion discussions
StarM
04:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions
StarM
04:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Eastmain
talk
05:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
StarM

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘