Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Forever (website) (2nd nomination)

1284:“From reading the terms of service, it looks like they are making a legitimate effort to set up a service with guaranteed longevity,” Thaw said. “But the biggest issue is if Forever goes out of business. ... As with all things, you can't make perfect guarantees and ensure they will be followed because things can happen.” Meakem's response: Even if Forever fails, clients' accounts will be safe. The Forever Guarantee Fund — established with an initial $ 1 million investment from Forever, plus ongoing contributions from new transactions — is separate from Forever, he said. “Every month we drop more money in,” Meakem said. “We think we're overfunded, which is good for the customer.” The money is invested in diversified stocks and bonds and is designed to earn 8 percent a year, Meakem said. Four percent of the fund profits is spent on the site services, including security and migration issues. If Forever does fail and the accounts can no longer be maintained, the terms of service state that the fund will be used to return content to clients. 366:

in the digital world. Perhaps the more serious drawback, we think, is the user experience. We uploaded a few photos on a free account, and found the Forever service to be time-consuming. The photo-uploading process was completed after several minutes, longer than it takes on other online storage services we’ve tried. Forever’s management says that’s because the cloud stores its photos in uncompressed file formats, which preserve the original resolution and quality of the photos. The firm is aware of the slow upload issue, however, and says it is working on speeding up the service. It better have if Forever is to migrate from a novelty service to a business that lasts.

746:, an article that relies on PRIMARY sources for facts and details is not, by definition, a reliable third party source intellectually separated from the subject. The majority of the article is promotional. I agree that there is a "downsides" paragraph too but then mitagates any possible negativity by finishing with a statement that the company is aware of the issue and is working on it. Hardly critical then and looks like the company were given a right-to-reply to any criticisms. 1143:. It is as simple as that and none of the other issues belong to this discussion. Again, on how does it meet the required standard, in my opinion, has been demonstrated by multiple reliable sources currently cited in article and available on a simple web-search. Additionally, I fail to notice any convincing argument in favour of deletion. (I'm very likely to not answer any comment for the time being). 1398:. The article relies on data and information provided directly by Meakem. The article has a lot of tells but especially sentences that comfirm that the information originates from Meakem by starting with words such as "Meakem describes", "Meakem told me", "Meakem gave me a tour", etc. The data and information is from a PRIMARY source (can't get more PRIMARY than Meakem) and fails the criteria in 1048:, this company is based in Pittsburgh, so it's only obvious that their local publication would advertise a local business, as all of them choose, and thus also violates WP:CORPDEPTH since it says such news stories are not notable-causing. The basis of "The article is still notable since the last AfD" is not acceptable because we've always renominated articles and there's no policy against it. 1193:"The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, author, inventor, or vendor) have actually considered the topic notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works of their own that focus upon it—without incentive, promotion, or other influence by people connected to the topic matter." 672:. Article from the Pittsburgh Tribute" fails for the exact same reasons as the others. It is promotional and relies on quotes from the company and from the founder, Meakem, along with a photo of Meakem taken for the article. Like the other articles above, it is therefore a PRIMARY source and is not independent. It fails the criteria in 1252:“From reading the terms of service, it looks like they are making a legitimate effort to set up a service with guaranteed longevity,” Thaw said. “But the biggest issue is if Forever goes out of business. ... As with all things, you can't make perfect guarantees and ensure they will be followed because things can happen.” 511:“From reading the terms of service, it looks like they are making a legitimate effort to set up a service with guaranteed longevity,” Thaw said. “But the biggest issue is if Forever goes out of business. ... As with all things, you can't make perfect guarantees and ensure they will be followed because things can happen.” 1052:, each article above is from each company financial quarter, not a consistent flow of coverage (see above, January 2016, January 2016, September 2016) so it's not even satisfying WP:CORPDEPTH either since it's not consistent, so that emphasizes the fact it was simply to motivate their own advertising. 450:

Part digital family album and part time capsule, Forever targets mature audiences seeking to share and maintain family histories. Ancestral photos, marriage licenses and senior graduation pictures can be uploaded to the site and, before the year is out, audio and video streams also will be able to be

1008:

Forever guarantees customers who buy “permanent sharable storage” that their photos and memories will be saved for their lifetimes plus 100 years with the goal of many generations beyond....The company can make this guarantee because a large portion of the money customers pay for “permanent storage”

1500:

So while it is true that articles written about notable organizations may often include a quote from personnel, there are also other factors such as the nature of the publication itself, the expertise of the author or journalist and context of the entire article must be taken into consideration. In

1230:

We uploaded a few photos on a free account, and found the Forever service to be time-consuming. The photo-uploading process was completed after several minutes, longer than it takes on other online storage services we’ve tried. Forever’s management says that’s because the cloud stores its photos in

1225:

Downside? Forever claims to be the only photo cloud service that guarantees permanence—storing your photos securely and with data protection “through good times and bad”—but recent events have shown that cybercrime can happen on even the most secure systems. There is no real guarantee of permanence

365:

1043:

since that itself says materials must not be press releases or similar. Any article that is closely focused with what the company advertised at its own website is clearly not independent, because no one but the company itself would say it. Next, all of the sources are clear publications, such as a

1522:

There is nothing about interviews at all in that link. If a company is so notable they interview people about it, its the same as a book being notable because they interviewed the writer of it. The news source is independent of that company, they don't have the same parent company owning them.

665:. Article from "Pittsburgh Post Gazette" fails for the same reasons. It is promotional and relies on quotes from the company and from the founder, Meakem, along with a photo of Meakem. Like the other articles above, it is therefore a PRIMARY source and is not independent. It fails the criteria in 233:

as examining the articles listed above are in fact advertorials in that one of them says the business "guards your memories!", entirely PR, the next one then is a few paragraphs but it noticeably contains interviewed information and also company information, whereas the other is a clear interview

1038:

All of this has the same blatant consistency of "Company has to say this or that", "Company CEO shares his ideas", "Company shares their funding and finances", All of that blatantly still violates the policy WP:Knowledge (XXG) is not a business listing. If this is honestly the best we have, it's

1035:

Founder and CEO of Forever, entrepreneur Glen Meakem, took a chance in 2012 with a start-up that had the potential to revolutionize the way people store their most personal data — their family photos, videos, memories — ultimately, their legacies. His idea was to create a secure, reliable online

1003:

Forever claims to be the only photo cloud service that guarantees permanence—storing your photos securely and with data protection “through good times and bad”—but recent events have shown that cybercrime can happen on even the most secure systems. There is no real guarantee of permanence in the

552:

The company can make this guarantee because a large portion of the money customers pay for “permanent storage” is deposited into the Forever Guarantee Fund, a restricted fund that acts like a permanent endowment or reserve, with earnings paying for storage, bandwidth, and migration to new file

1308:

Looking at the reliable sources referenced in the article, I don't see why they wouldn't count towards notability. The same person sending the same article to AFD a second time, and pinging 5 people on the talk page he felt would agree with him to canvass them over here, is ridiculous.

1255:

Forever says that its customers' photos will be saved for their lifetimes plus 100 years. A promotional article would not say Forever's "100-year guarantee is not ironclad" and then quote an information security expert to say that it's not guaranteed because what if "Forever goes out of

1231:

uncompressed file formats, which preserve the original resolution and quality of the photos. The firm is aware of the slow upload issue, however, and says it is working on speeding up the service. It better have if Forever is to migrate from a novelty service to a business that lasts.

1036:

cloud-based storage system that would keep a user's photos, documents, videos and more accessible for a lifetime, plus 100 years, to ensure future generations could access them as well. Next the comments are not based in policy at all and they are simply suggestive guidelines.

1615:- Possible canvassing apart, having checked the sources I also am of the opinion that this is artspam. Multiple sources all saying more or less the same thing, multiple cites to the same sources, do not notabilty make, and there is also the question of dead links. 712:

The article contains a "downsides" paragraph that notes "Perhaps the more serious drawback, we think, is the user experience. We uploaded a few photos on a free account, and found the Forever service to be time-consuming." A promotional piece would not include this

1030:

What's unique about Forever is that it not only has the lifetime plus 100-year guarantee, but it also promises to upgrade what its customers save to the latest technology, so it'll be accessible no matter what format is popular or current at a particular time in

411:

1026:

Six months after its May 2012 founding, the company closed a $ 9 million round of Series A financing funded at least partially through Meakem Becker. One month later, it opened for business in a gleaming Downtown office space on the 20th floor of One PPG

460:

498:

After a low-profile start, Forever rolled out new features last week, including a website redesign and an app that allows customers to design and print special products. Forever has 30,000 active users and expects to reach 50,000 by year's end, Meakem

658:. Article from "Detroit Free Press" fails since it is also clearly a promotional piece and is essentially a question and answer interview with Meakem, with photos. It is therefore a PRIMARY source and is not independent. It fails the criteria in 400:

404:

His idea was to create a secure, reliable online cloud-based storage system that would keep a user's photos, documents, videos and more accessible for a lifetime, plus 100 years, to ensure future generations could access them as

651:. Article from "Penta Daily" fails as it is clearly a promotional piece and carries quotes from both the founder, Meakem, and the company itself. It is therefore a PRIMARY source and is not independent. It fails the criteria in 1021:

Forever rolled out new features last week, including a website redesign and an app that allows customers to design and print special products. Forever has 30,000 active users and expects to reach 50,000 by year's end, Meakem

710:– that the article contains quotes from the founder and the company does not make it a primary source or a promotional piece. It is good journalistic practice for journalists to seek comment from the subjects of their pieces. 1009:

is deposited into the Forever Guarantee Fund, a restricted fund that acts like a permanent endowment or reserve, with earnings paying for storage, bandwidth, and migration to new file formats for generations into the future

1281:

Your point about the security expert comments is disingenuous to the article contents. In the interests of complete disclosure you should also include the very next line (and possible the ones after as well) which state

184: 716:

That the articles contain photos of the founder does not make the articles promotional. If that were the case, Knowledge (XXG) would be considered promotional merely because it frequently displays photos of article

83: 1415:

When anyone is interviewed or written about, they quote them. I doubt they are being paid to do that. You have no evidence of that at all. Anyone successful in business is going to be sought after by the media.

1480:

Knowledge (XXG) articles have to meet a particular test for notability and there are policies and guidelines to help determine the suitability or otherwise of each subject. One of the key tests for organizations

457:

The cloud-based social sharing site founded last December by Meakem Becker Venture Capital co-founder Glen Meakem has already reached financial and statistical milestones hard to come by for breakout companies.

446:

One year after social media archives site forever.com was launched with plans to corner the long-term digital storage market, a secondary goal of guarding personal memories from prying eyes has taken center

1276:

You make much the same points above and I won't repeat the reponse here but I'll summarise by saying that the sources are not independent from the subject and therefore fail as reliable third-party sources.

1444:

Interviews are simply weak source - what the company/representative says about itself. Independent (on the subject of this article) coverage would be more useful (eg. reviews of their services).

688:

I've also examined the sources in the article and the exact same pattern emerges. None of the sources are independent. Please be aware that sources must be independent - criteria can be found at

937: 1509:. It is difficult to accept that these articles are not promotional since they all contain an accurate copy of the company's key messages and USP and allow the CEO to rebutt some criticisms. 549:

Forever guarantees customers who buy “permanent sharable storage” that their photos and memories will be saved for their lifetimes plus 100 years with the goal of many generations beyond.

215:

There are no improvement from last AfD. Only coverage is found for this one is local newspaper. it is not enough to establish Wiki Standard. Nominating again for Speedy delete this time.

1501:

this case, it is very obvious that these articles are advertorials and it is not an accident that every article contains an interview and quotations from Meakam advertising his company.

1489:. While interviews with company personnel can be used for trivial data, these sources are ignored for the purposes of determining notability as they are not independent of the subject. 613: 495:

Forever started in 2012 and reported revenue of $ 827,000 last year. Projected revenue for 2015 is more than $ 3 million, with Meakem anticipating “very rapid growth” within years.

137: 517:

The Forever Guarantee Fund — established with an initial $ 1 million investment from Forever, plus ongoing contributions from new transactions — is separate from Forever, he said.

178: 834: 772: 78: 261: 1568:

Significant coverage independent of the article subject in reliable sources = notability under the current standards. Not liking the prose is, as always, a content issue.

1163:: I've gone through *all* of the sources provided here and in the article and *none* of the sources are reliable or independent of the subject and *all* of the sources are 1044:

radio station, which are known for simply airing whatever commercials the company wants, and that itself still violates WP:CORPDEPTH since it's not a significant source.

292: 1344:

Perhaps you have a different idea of what constitutes a "reliable source" than other WP editors. Can you list the sources you consider to meet the criteria here please?

1286:

Giving the company the right to reply (to faint criticism to start with) and turn it into yet-more-promotional-blurb is the epitome of promotional placed advertorials.

679:. Article from "WTAQ" fails for very similar reasons. It is an interview with Meakem and is therefore a PRIMARY source and is not independent. It fails the criteria in 144: 310: 279: 1088:

article does. I have not seen "clear-brochure content" note that "It better have if Forever is to migrate from a novelty service to a business that lasts."

383: 1361: 1121:. Looking for an independent article is nigh-on impossible as Meakem appears to be quoted every time and articles are invariable promotional in nature. 429: 648:. Further, sources should be intellectually independent of each other and independent of the subject. Here's my comments on the sources you've listed. 559: 330: 1357:

Pittsburg Business Times interviewed the guy about this when he first started, there a video interview there in the long written article about it.

52:. Opinion here is quite divided regarding the sources that cover the company, with a general disagreement regarding source validity relative to 1012: 708:

Article from "Penta Daily" fails as it is clearly a promotional piece and carries quotes from both the founder, Meakem, and the company itself.

110: 105: 114: 1117:- none are independent and sources inevitably are puff pieces that quote the founder, Meakem, or the company. The article fails GNG and 1624: 1605: 1578: 1546: 1517: 1453: 1439: 1410: 1385: 1352: 1332: 1294: 1266: 1204: 1179: 1151: 1129: 1097: 1070: 991: 967: 928: 862: 814: 786: 754: 728: 700: 627: 584: 315: 284: 252: 224: 97: 62: 532: 17: 828: 199: 979:

since none are independent of the subject (and if you read them, it is very clear that the articles epitomize the definition of an

166: 1358: 571: 1575: 800: 848: 940:. The topic is still is notable as it was during the last AfD. Plenty of non-trivial coverage from sources that easily meet 1485:

states that a company is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple secondary sources that are

740:

that the article contains quotes from the founder and the company does not make it a primary source or a promotional piece.

1001:- As I still confirm my delete above, given how this is still a blatant misuse of Knowledge (XXG) as a business listing: 567: 1643: 160: 40: 609: 156: 1238: 1019:

itself says: Knowledge (XXG) is not the place for such simple information as YellowPages, company services, etc.

953: 473: 1249:

David Thaw, an information security expert at Pitt's School of Law, said the 100-year guarantee is not ironclad.

508:

David Thaw, an information security expert at Pitt's School of Law, said the 100-year guarantee is not ironclad.

348: 1065: 247: 206: 945: 424: 563: 964: 808: 780: 478: 101: 1589: 1490: 1118: 1040: 1639: 1601: 1218: 1200: 1084: 822: 596: 343: 58: 36: 1482: 1110: 56:. This discussion has received plenty of input, but no consensus for a particular action has occurred. 936:

Bad-faith nomination of an article that was listed by the same user four months ago (a user who was

1572: 1149: 1053: 914: 883: 794: 235: 220: 192: 172: 1502: 1596:

and are insufficient for notability. The coverage is routine, "local company does well" content.

1258: 1089: 949: 920: 854: 842: 720: 619: 602: 576: 378: 610:

Knowledge (XXG):Editing policy#Knowledge (XXG) is a work in progress: perfection is not required

1620: 958: 906: 804: 776: 93: 68: 29:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

1638:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

35:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

1597: 1524: 1449: 1417: 1363: 1310: 1262: 1196: 1093: 924: 896: 858: 818: 724: 646:

on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy

623: 580: 1593: 1399: 1168: 1114: 976: 941: 743: 689: 680: 673: 666: 659: 652: 641: 53: 1569: 1144: 1082:– I have not seen "clear brochure-content" list the downsides of the service which the 910: 790: 216: 1592:

so than an NPOV article can be written about the subject. The local sources also fail

1360:

I believe the ample coverage given by the reliable source of the Post Gazette counts.

1140: 469:"Downtown-based Forever.com promises to preserve photos, files 100 years beyond death" 1510: 1403: 1345: 1287: 1172: 1122: 984: 838: 747: 693: 640:- I've examined the sources you've cited above. Sources must follow the criteria in 1616: 1505:

states that sources used to support a claim of notability specifically *excludes*

1004:

digital world. Perhaps the more serious drawback, we think, is the user experience

131: 1445: 1395: 1164: 980: 614:

Knowledge (XXG):Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#Surmountable problems

1507:

advertising and marketing materials by, about, or on behalf of the organization

1234:

An article that criticizes Forever cannot be considered to be promotional.

975:

Actually the opposite is true. None of the sources you've mentioned meet

901: 882:

I have renominated it for AfD. because of no improvement from last time.

514:

Meakem's response: Even if Forever fails, clients' accounts will be safe.

1171:

and does *not* contain quotes or references from Meakem or the company?

524: 468: 419: 373: 338: 1402:

since the source is not "third-party" nor separate from the subject.

1228:

Perhaps the more serious drawback, we think, is the user experience.

1632:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.

742:

For the purposes of Knowledge (XXG) and the criteria set out in

528: 1167:. Can you point to a single source that meets the criteria in 1495:

quotations from an organization's personnel as story sources

938:

recently been blocked over abuse of the deletion process)

525:"Forever Expands Suamico Location to Meet Growing Demand" 84:

Articles for deletion/Forever (website) (2nd nomination)

1039:

simply republished materials, and that itself violates

874: 835:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Forever (website)

773:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Forever (website)

564:

Knowledge (XXG):Notability#General notability guideline

420:"Forever.com guards personal memories from prying eyes" 127: 123: 119: 1493:

states that acceptable sources specifically *exclude*

1394:

and yes, the article is another perfect example of an

1011:(Note all of this is clear brochure-content, and thus 191: 1191:. Fails to meet notability standards, in particular, 594:

The subject is covered in two nonlocal publications:

1588:-- I do not find the sources presented here meeting 608:The article is neutrally written and well sourced. 374:"Forever CEO is in the business of saving memories" 205: 1195:All of the articles cited above are promotional. 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 1646:). No further edits should be made to this page. 1523:That's what "independent of the subject" means. 1214:All of the articles cited above are promotional. 262:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 1113:. *None* of the sources meet the criteria in 293:list of Websites-related deletion discussions 8: 1013:WP:Knowledge (XXG) is not a business listing 291:Note: This debate has been included in the 260:Note: This debate has been included in the 644:which states that articles should be based 1080:Note all of this is clear brochure-content 775:participants who have not commented here: 566:, which requires "significant coverage in 290: 259: 234:with the CEO, overall clear advertising. 553:formats for generations into the future. 79:Articles for deletion/Forever (website) 76: 1391: 1283: 1034: 1029: 1025: 1020: 1007: 1002: 739: 1139:: It should be kept because it meets 372:Shamus, Kristen Jordan (2016-01-30). 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 1141:Knowledge (XXG)'s inclusion criteria 339:"The Latest in Family Photo Storage" 75: 24: 558:There is sufficient coverage in 329:per the significant coverage in 418:Todd, Deborah M. (2014-01-15). 917:) 03:50, 18 January 2017 (UTC) 1: 467:Togneri, Chris (2015-09-26). 1625:01:45, 20 January 2017 (UTC) 1606:00:56, 20 January 2017 (UTC) 1579:22:14, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1547:00:50, 20 January 2017 (UTC) 1518:21:50, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1454:19:13, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1440:18:37, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1411:18:05, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1386:17:03, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1353:14:28, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1333:10:28, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1295:14:28, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1267:06:30, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1246:That said, questions remain. 1205:04:53, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1180:18:08, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1152:22:56, 18 January 2017 (UTC) 1130:18:06, 18 January 2017 (UTC) 1098:06:30, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1071:15:58, 18 January 2017 (UTC) 992:18:14, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 968:14:12, 18 January 2017 (UTC) 929:08:27, 18 January 2017 (UTC) 877:on the article's talk page: 863:08:27, 18 January 2017 (UTC) 755:14:28, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 729:06:30, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 701:18:06, 18 January 2017 (UTC) 628:08:27, 18 January 2017 (UTC) 585:08:27, 18 January 2017 (UTC) 505:That said, questions remain. 337:Talati, Sonia (2016-01-08). 316:07:25, 18 January 2017 (UTC) 285:07:25, 18 January 2017 (UTC) 253:03:54, 18 January 2017 (UTC) 225:03:48, 18 January 2017 (UTC) 63:03:57, 26 January 2017 (UTC) 1663: 1487:independent of the subject 523:Flynt, Jeff (2016-03-09). 1239:Pittsburgh Tribune-Review 954:Pittsburgh Tribune-Review 562:to allow Forever to pass 474:Pittsburgh Tribune-Review 1635:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 946:Pittsburgh Post-Gazette 425:Pittsburgh Post-Gazette 1254: 1233: 1226:in the digital world. 919: 555: 519: 463: 414: 368: 74:AfDs for this article: 1390:You say that the PBT 1244: 1223: 880: 547: 493: 444: 398: 363: 1015:applies because the 999:Comment and analysis 1392:interviewed the guy 950:Detroit Free Press 603:Detroit Free Press 545:The article notes: 491:The article notes: 442:The article notes: 396:The article notes: 379:Detroit Free Press 361:The article notes: 318: 314: 311:(Follow my trail) 287: 283: 280:(Follow my trail) 94:Forever (website) 69:Forever (website) 1654: 1637: 1543: 1540: 1537: 1534: 1531: 1528: 1515: 1436: 1433: 1430: 1427: 1424: 1421: 1408: 1382: 1379: 1376: 1373: 1370: 1367: 1350: 1329: 1326: 1323: 1320: 1317: 1314: 1292: 1177: 1147: 1127: 1068: 1063: 989: 962: 893: 871:Canvassing note: 752: 698: 574:of the subject". 568:reliable sources 560:reliable sources 543: 541: 540: 531:. Archived from 489: 487: 486: 477:. Archived from 440: 438: 437: 428:. Archived from 394: 392: 391: 382:. Archived from 359: 357: 356: 347:. Archived from 331:reliable sources 308: 306: 300: 277: 275: 269: 250: 245: 210: 209: 195: 147: 135: 117: 61: 34: 1662: 1661: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1644:deletion review 1633: 1617:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 1541: 1538: 1535: 1532: 1529: 1526: 1511: 1434: 1431: 1428: 1425: 1422: 1419: 1404: 1380: 1377: 1374: 1371: 1368: 1365: 1346: 1327: 1324: 1321: 1318: 1315: 1312: 1288: 1242:article notes: 1173: 1145: 1123: 1109:Indeed this is 1066: 1054: 985: 960: 884: 837:closing admin: 748: 694: 538: 536: 522: 484: 482: 466: 435: 433: 417: 389: 387: 371: 354: 352: 336: 313: 304: 296: 282: 273: 265: 248: 236: 152: 143: 108: 92: 89: 72: 57: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1660: 1658: 1649: 1648: 1628: 1627: 1609: 1608: 1582: 1581: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1498: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1336: 1335: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1278: 1277: 1271: 1270: 1222:article says: 1208: 1207: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1155: 1154: 1133: 1132: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1074: 1073: 996: 995: 994: 931: 867: 866: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 733: 732: 686: 685: 684: 677: 670: 663: 656: 632: 631: 589: 588: 557: 556: 520: 464: 415: 369: 322: 320: 319: 309: 288: 278: 256: 255: 213: 212: 149: 88: 87: 86: 81: 73: 71: 66: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1659: 1647: 1645: 1641: 1636: 1630: 1629: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1611: 1610: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1584: 1583: 1580: 1577: 1574: 1571: 1567: 1564: 1563: 1548: 1545: 1544: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1516: 1514: 1508: 1504: 1499: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1438: 1437: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1409: 1407: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1384: 1383: 1362: 1359: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1351: 1349: 1343: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1334: 1331: 1330: 1307: 1304: 1303: 1296: 1293: 1291: 1285: 1280: 1279: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1269: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1253: 1250: 1247: 1243: 1241: 1240: 1232: 1229: 1221: 1220: 1215: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1187: 1186: 1181: 1178: 1176: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1153: 1150: 1148: 1142: 1138: 1135: 1134: 1131: 1128: 1126: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1105: 1104: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1086: 1081: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1072: 1069: 1064: 1061: 1057: 1051: 1047: 1042: 1037: 1032: 1028: 1023: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1005: 1000: 997: 993: 990: 988: 982: 978: 974: 971: 970: 969: 966: 965: 963: 955: 951: 947: 943: 939: 935: 932: 930: 926: 922: 918: 916: 912: 908: 904: 903: 898: 894: 891: 887: 879: 876: 872: 869: 868: 865: 864: 860: 856: 852: 850: 847: 844: 840: 836: 830: 827: 824: 820: 816: 813: 810: 806: 802: 799: 796: 792: 788: 785: 782: 778: 774: 770: 769: 756: 753: 751: 745: 741: 737: 736: 735: 734: 731: 730: 726: 722: 718: 714: 709: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 699: 697: 691: 687: 682: 678: 675: 671: 668: 664: 661: 657: 654: 650: 649: 647: 643: 639: 636: 635: 634: 633: 630: 629: 625: 621: 617: 615: 611: 605: 604: 599: 598: 593: 592: 591: 590: 587: 586: 582: 578: 573: 569: 565: 561: 554: 550: 546: 535:on 2017-01-18 534: 530: 526: 521: 518: 515: 512: 509: 506: 503: 500: 496: 492: 481:on 2017-01-18 480: 476: 475: 470: 465: 462: 458: 455: 452: 448: 443: 432:on 2017-01-18 431: 427: 426: 421: 416: 413: 409: 406: 402: 397: 386:on 2017-01-18 385: 381: 380: 375: 370: 367: 362: 351:on 2017-01-18 350: 346: 345: 340: 335: 334: 332: 328: 325: 324: 323: 317: 312: 307: 299: 294: 289: 286: 281: 276: 268: 263: 258: 257: 254: 251: 246: 243: 239: 232: 229: 228: 227: 226: 222: 218: 208: 204: 201: 198: 194: 190: 186: 183: 180: 177: 174: 171: 168: 165: 162: 158: 155: 154:Find sources: 150: 146: 142: 139: 133: 129: 125: 121: 116: 112: 107: 103: 99: 95: 91: 90: 85: 82: 80: 77: 70: 67: 65: 64: 60: 59:North America 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 1634: 1631: 1612: 1590:WP:CORPDEPTH 1585: 1565: 1525: 1512: 1506: 1494: 1491:WP:CORPDEPTH 1486: 1418: 1405: 1364: 1347: 1341: 1311: 1305: 1289: 1257: 1251: 1248: 1245: 1237: 1235: 1227: 1224: 1217: 1213: 1192: 1188: 1174: 1165:advertorials 1160: 1136: 1124: 1119:WP:CORPDEPTH 1106: 1083: 1079: 1059: 1055: 1049: 1045: 1041:WP:CORPDEPTH 1016: 998: 986: 972: 957: 944:, including 933: 907:Lemongirl942 900: 889: 885: 881: 878: 870: 853: 845: 832: 825: 811: 805:David Gerard 797: 783: 777:Ohnoitsjamie 749: 719: 715: 711: 707: 695: 645: 637: 618: 607: 601: 595: 575: 551: 548: 544: 537:. Retrieved 533:the original 516: 513: 510: 507: 504: 501: 497: 494: 490: 483:. Retrieved 479:the original 472: 459: 456: 453: 449: 445: 441: 434:. Retrieved 430:the original 423: 410: 407: 403: 399: 395: 388:. Retrieved 384:the original 377: 364: 360: 353:. Retrieved 349:the original 342: 326: 321: 302: 297: 271: 266: 241: 237: 230: 214: 202: 196: 188: 181: 175: 169: 163: 153: 140: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 1598:K.e.coffman 1513:-- HighKing 1483:WP:ORGCRITE 1406:-- HighKing 1396:advertorial 1348:-- HighKing 1290:-- HighKing 1197:Glendoremus 1175:-- HighKing 1125:-- HighKing 1111:WP:CORPSPAM 987:-- HighKing 981:advertorial 897:K.e.coffman 819:K.e.coffman 750:-- HighKing 696:-- HighKing 572:independent 179:free images 1256:business". 873:Light2021 539:2017-01-18 485:2017-01-18 436:2017-01-18 390:2017-01-18 355:2017-01-18 1640:talk page 1576:(contrib) 1570:Eggishorn 1503:WP:ORGIND 911:Light2021 875:canvassed 791:Anupmehra 738:You said 717:subjects. 713:critique. 570:that are 401:legacies. 305:Horrorist 274:Horrorist 217:Light2021 37:talk page 1642:or in a 1219:Barron's 1085:Barron's 1046:As it is 961:itsJamie 849:contribs 839:Euryalus 833:Pinging 829:contribs 815:contribs 801:contribs 787:contribs 771:Pinging 597:Barron's 412:history. 344:Barron's 138:View log 39:or in a 1342:Comment 1161:Comment 1031:history 973:Comment 817:), and 638:Comment 185:WP refs 173:scholar 111:protect 106:history 1613:Delete 1594:WP:AUD 1586:Delete 1573:(talk) 1446:Pavlor 1259:Cunard 1216:– the 1189:Delete 1107:Delete 1090:Cunard 1062:wister 1058:wister 1027:Place. 1017:policy 952:, and 921:Cunard 892:wister 888:wister 855:Cunard 721:Cunard 620:Cunard 577:Cunard 461:Place. 451:saved. 447:stage. 301:, the 270:, the 244:wister 240:wister 231:Delete 157:Google 115:delete 1542:Focus 1435:Focus 1400:WP:RS 1381:Focus 1328:Focus 1169:WP:RS 1115:WP:RS 977:WP:RS 942:WP:RS 744:WP:RS 690:WP:RS 681:WP:RS 674:WP:RS 667:WP:RS 660:WP:RS 653:WP:RS 642:WP:RS 499:said. 405:well. 200:JSTOR 161:books 145:Stats 132:views 124:watch 120:links 54:WP:RS 16:< 1621:talk 1602:talk 1566:Keep 1450:talk 1306:Keep 1263:talk 1236:The 1201:talk 1146:Anup 1137:Keep 1094:talk 1067:talk 1050:Next 1022:said 959:OhNo 934:Keep 925:talk 915:talk 859:talk 843:talk 823:talk 809:talk 795:talk 781:talk 725:talk 624:talk 612:and 600:and 581:talk 529:WTAQ 327:Keep 303:Mad 298:Zeke 272:Mad 267:Zeke 249:talk 221:talk 193:FENS 167:news 128:logs 102:talk 98:edit 902:DGG 895:, 803:), 789:), 502:... 454:... 408:... 207:TWL 136:– ( 1623:) 1604:) 1452:) 1265:) 1203:) 1096:) 1033:, 1024:, 1006:, 983:. 956:. 948:, 927:) 909:. 905:, 899:, 861:) 851:). 831:). 727:) 692:. 626:) 583:) 527:. 471:. 422:. 376:. 341:. 295:. 264:. 223:) 187:) 130:| 126:| 122:| 118:| 113:| 109:| 104:| 100:| 1619:( 1600:( 1539:m 1536:a 1533:e 1530:r 1527:D 1497:. 1448:( 1432:m 1429:a 1426:e 1423:r 1420:D 1378:m 1375:a 1372:e 1369:r 1366:D 1325:m 1322:a 1319:e 1316:r 1313:D 1261:( 1199:( 1092:( 1060:T 1056:S 923:( 913:( 890:T 886:S 857:( 846:· 841:( 826:· 821:( 812:· 807:( 798:· 793:( 784:· 779:( 723:( 683:. 676:. 669:. 662:. 655:. 622:( 616:. 606:. 579:( 542:. 488:. 439:. 393:. 358:. 333:. 242:T 238:S 219:( 211:) 203:· 197:· 189:· 182:· 176:· 170:· 164:· 159:( 151:( 148:) 141:· 134:) 96:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Forever (website) (2nd nomination) - Knowledge (XXG)

Index