216:
page). At the moment, Fail2ban seems to be the only tool of such kind which is still being developed and maintained. How "noticable" fail2ban is? as noted above -- googling brings A LOT of references and the stories of success. The main author of Fail2ban from time to time treats me with the kind
117:
prod tag was in place for six months, notability tag for six months before that. This is a non-notable piece of software and nobody has ever stepped up to establish why it deserves an article or bring the stub up to even basic copyediting standards.
149:
217:
emails from the users expressing their gratitude (unfortunately I can't cite or reference those from the article). Nevertheless I added few more references to the
Internet-published articles highlighting
136:
Unfortunately my comment in the edit history does not make that very clear. The request mentions one source (in German), but it is indeed unclear whether there is sufficient independent coverage. --
110:
221:, also I added a couple of citations. I hope it would be sufficient to keep the article within wikipedia and remove the "deletion" banner. Thanks everyone in advance!
212:: Well, I am the one who initiated this article after I saw alternative tools listed within wikipedia (they are referenced from
148:
I did some googling and the German article mentioned likely is this review from August in a magazine called "PC Professionell"
17:
131:
Actually the article had been deleted because of the PROD and I just restored it yesterday upon request. The diffs are these
83:
78:
87:
243:
70:
36:
242:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
152:
49:
222:
225:
204:
190:
162:
140:
122:
52:
218:
213:
182:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
119:
159:
156:
137:
74:
201:
178:
104:
154:
187:
151:(google translation). There's also some other articles about it in google (e.g.
172:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
66:
58:
200:: Somewhat notable, but does need some sourcing in the article. -
236:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
158:). So, it seems to be at least somewhat notable to me. -
134:
132:
100:
96:
92:
177:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
246:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
226:05:39, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
53:14:12, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
205:04:49, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
191:02:27, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
163:11:58, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
141:08:35, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
123:08:19, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
263:
185:) 02:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
239:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
186:
254:
241:
188:This is a Secret
176:
174:
120:Chris Cunningham
108:
90:
34:
262:
261:
257:
256:
255:
253:
252:
251:
250:
244:deletion review
237:
170:
81:
65:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
260:
258:
249:
248:
231:
229:
228:
207:
194:
193:
175:
167:
166:
165:
143:
115:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
259:
247:
245:
240:
234:
233:
232:
227:
224:
220:
215:
211:
208:
206:
203:
199:
196:
195:
192:
189:
184:
180:
173:
169:
168:
164:
161:
157:
155:
153:
150:
147:
144:
142:
139:
135:
133:
130:
127:
126:
125:
124:
121:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
238:
235:
230:
209:
197:
171:
145:
128:
116:
45:
43:
31:
28:
223:Yarikoptic
146:Weak keep
219:Fail2Ban
214:Fail2Ban
160:Allefant
138:Tikiwont
111:View log
67:Fail2ban
59:Fail2ban
202:Rjd0060
179:Locobot
129:Comment
84:protect
79:history
50:W.marsh
88:delete
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
210:Keep
198:Keep
183:talk
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
46:keep
109:– (
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
181:(
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.