Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Failure of imagination - Knowledge

Source 📝

27:
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
170: 112:— high-profile external link (so now the first sight of Knowledge for a lot of new users is a warning that the article that brought them to Knowledge "is being considered for deletion in accordance with Knowledge's deletion policy" — oh, 147:
a policy which says that users should nominate pages for deletion if they believe they meet the deletion criteria. Berating them for doing just this shows a
260:. Term clearly has come in common usage - article however ehidibits a strong bias outside the scope of discussing the issue of "failure of imagination". 51:
Obvious phrase. Sure it was used in the 9/11 report but in the same way that "brake failure" is used to describe the failure of brakes.--
17: 285: 270: 252: 222: 210: 196: 187: 155: 148: 138: 129: 120: 104: 84: 55: 39: 218:
Normally would be weak keep, but the link per Dbenbenn and Epopt means we should try to make this a better article.
134:
There is no policy that says an article good enough to be cited outside Knowledge must be nominated for deletion.
284:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
231: 93: 169:, I think it has a specific 9/11-related meaning beyond the obvious one that the article explains well and 73: 45: 193: 152: 126: 101: 81: 235: 184: 135: 117: 65: 52: 219: 174: 77: 183:
It has a distinct meaning, and we should remove the VfD tag as soon as possible.
249: 245: 207: 69: 36: 267: 76:. Anyway, the phrase has a particular meaning in security now. 278:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
125:
Please don't berate your fellow editors for following policy. --
192:
We can't remove the VfD tag until this vote is through. --
206:. It's 9/11 context makes it of encyclopedic value. -- 288:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 100:as a form of this logical fallacy. -- 7: 149:lack of respect for their good faith 24: 98:fallacy of failure of imagination 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 96:, which already describes the 1: 35:. Anon IP vote discounted. - 31:The result of the debate was 305: 238:14:01, July 17, 2005 (UTC) 177:22:35, July 15, 2005 (UTC) 271:17:15, 22 July 2005 (UTC) 253:23:27, 17 July 2005 (UTC) 223:16:35, 16 July 2005 (UTC) 211:00:01, 16 July 2005 (UTC) 197:03:34, 16 July 2005 (UTC) 188:23:25, 15 July 2005 (UTC) 156:03:34, 16 July 2005 (UTC) 139:23:16, 15 July 2005 (UTC) 130:18:39, 15 July 2005 (UTC) 121:17:49, 15 July 2005 (UTC) 105:17:02, 15 July 2005 (UTC) 85:16:41, 15 July 2005 (UTC) 56:16:29, 15 July 2005 (UTC) 40:00:43, 23 July 2005 (UTC) 281:Please do not modify it. 232:Argument from ignorance 94:Argument from ignorance 74:Failure of imagination 64:. I was just reading 46:Failure of imagination 266:. Little to add. -- 286:undeletion request 90:Merge and redirect 70:July 15 CryptoGram 248:'s statement. -- 296: 283: 304: 303: 299: 298: 297: 295: 294: 293: 292: 279: 244:. I agree with 171:Google confirms 72:. He links to 49: 33:KEEP:8k, 2r, 1d 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 302: 300: 291: 290: 274: 273: 261: 255: 239: 225: 213: 201: 200: 199: 178: 164: 163: 162: 161: 160: 159: 158: 116:real good PR) 107: 87: 66:Bruce Schneier 48: 43: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 301: 289: 287: 282: 276: 275: 272: 269: 265: 262: 259: 256: 254: 251: 247: 243: 240: 237: 233: 229: 226: 224: 221: 217: 214: 212: 209: 205: 202: 198: 195: 191: 190: 189: 186: 182: 179: 176: 172: 168: 165: 157: 154: 150: 146: 142: 141: 140: 137: 133: 132: 131: 128: 124: 123: 122: 119: 115: 111: 108: 106: 103: 99: 95: 91: 88: 86: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 63: 60: 59: 58: 57: 54: 47: 44: 42: 41: 38: 34: 29: 19: 280: 277: 263: 257: 241: 227: 215: 203: 180: 166: 144: 113: 109: 97: 89: 61: 50: 32: 30: 26: 185:Themindset 136:➥the Epopt 118:➥the Epopt 53:Lee Hunter 228:Redirect 220:Almafeta 175:Dcarrano 78:dbenbenn 250:Judson 246:Titoxd 208:Titoxd 143:There 114:that's 37:Splash 268:Kizor 216:Keep. 92:with 16:< 264:Keep 258:Edit 242:Keep 234:. - 204:Keep 181:Keep 167:Keep 151:. -- 110:Keep 82:talk 62:Keep 230:to 194:FOo 173:. 153:FOo 127:FOo 102:FOo 68:'s 236:Ar 145:is 80:|

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
Splash
00:43, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
Failure of imagination
Lee Hunter
16:29, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
Bruce Schneier
July 15 CryptoGram
Failure of imagination
dbenbenn
talk
16:41, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
Argument from ignorance
FOo
17:02, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
➥the Epopt
17:49, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
FOo
18:39, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
➥the Epopt
23:16, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
lack of respect for their good faith
FOo
03:34, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
Google confirms
Dcarrano
Themindset
23:25, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
FOo
03:34, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.