Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Feedspot - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

200:
Non-notable website which fails to meet Knowledge (XXG)'s notability guidelines. There are ~3 secondary sources used in the article, but one of them is a press release written by someone connected to the company. The others are quick reviews of the website, mostly because Google Reader closed. There
361:
While Feedspot may not be particularly notorious, and seems to get lots of bad grades for their specific marketing practices, it does get used and talked about. There are probably a lot of pages on Knowledge (XXG) that are less useful. It could use a little info on number of users, frequency of
362:
update, and pros and cons of its particular methodology. If its actual entry is removed, it should probably (at least) point to a general page on comparing newsreaders for people who are trying to find out information about it as I did when I came to Knowledge (XXG) today.
271:
at least not immediately. Feedspot may not be notable as a feedreader, but it's getting attention for its aggressive self-promotional use of subscribers' email contacts: when I started typing "feedsp.." in Google, the suggestion "feedspot spam" immediately popped up.
169: 52:. Very little discussion, but the one "keep" opinion makes no argument based in guidelines or practice, i.e., about the level of coverage in reliable source the topic has received. 122: 290: 218: 163: 129: 17: 340: 312: 95: 90: 389: 184: 40: 99: 151: 82: 145: 385: 367: 351: 36: 206: 298: 141: 371: 355: 331: 302: 281: 263: 235: 230: 210: 177: 86: 64: 202: 329: 277: 191: 78: 70: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
384:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
251: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
363: 247: 294: 259: 222: 55: 157: 322: 273: 116: 255: 378:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
343:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
315:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
250:
applies. References are to PR sources. Recently discussed at
112: 108: 104: 176: 321:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
349:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 190: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 392:). No further edits should be made to this page. 291:list of Software-related deletion discussions 219:list of Websites-related deletion discussions 8: 289:Note: This debate has been included in the 217:Note: This debate has been included in the 288: 216: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 201:has been no other coverage since. 24: 1: 246:Yes, a non-notable web site. 409: 372:16:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC) 356:11:38, 23 March 2016 (UTC) 332:18:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC) 303:15:17, 16 March 2016 (UTC) 282:09:47, 28 March 2016 (UTC) 264:06:08, 10 March 2016 (UTC) 65:21:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC) 236:18:10, 9 March 2016 (UTC) 211:05:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC) 381:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 358: 334: 305: 238: 63: 400: 383: 354: 348: 346: 344: 327: 320: 318: 316: 233: 229: 225: 195: 194: 180: 132: 120: 102: 62: 60: 53: 34: 408: 407: 403: 402: 401: 399: 398: 397: 396: 390:deletion review 379: 359: 350: 339: 337: 335: 323: 311: 309: 231: 227: 223: 137: 128: 93: 77: 74: 56: 54: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 406: 404: 395: 394: 347: 336: 319: 308: 307: 306: 285: 284: 266: 240: 239: 198: 197: 134: 73: 68: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 405: 393: 391: 387: 382: 376: 375: 374: 373: 369: 365: 357: 353: 352:North America 345: 342: 333: 330: 328: 326: 317: 314: 304: 300: 296: 292: 287: 286: 283: 279: 275: 270: 269:Do not delete 267: 265: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 242: 241: 237: 234: 226: 220: 215: 214: 213: 212: 208: 204: 193: 189: 186: 183: 179: 175: 171: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 143: 140: 139:Find sources: 135: 131: 127: 124: 118: 114: 110: 106: 101: 97: 92: 88: 84: 80: 76: 75: 72: 69: 67: 66: 61: 59: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 380: 377: 360: 338: 324: 310: 268: 243: 199: 187: 181: 173: 166: 160: 154: 148: 138: 125: 57: 49: 47: 31: 28: 364:Kentpollard 164:free images 295:Dialectric 256:John Nagle 58:Sandstein 386:talk page 224:Vipinhari 37:talk page 388:or in a 341:Relisted 325:UY Scuti 313:Relisted 274:Calmansi 123:View log 79:Feedspot 71:Feedspot 39:or in a 252:WP:COIN 203:Elaenia 170:WP refs 158:scholar 96:protect 91:history 248:WP:WEB 244:Delete 142:Google 100:delete 50:delete 185:JSTOR 146:books 130:Stats 117:views 109:watch 105:links 16:< 368:talk 299:talk 278:talk 260:talk 232:talk 207:talk 178:FENS 152:news 113:logs 87:talk 83:edit 192:TWL 121:– ( 370:) 301:) 293:. 280:) 262:) 254:. 228:|| 221:. 209:) 172:) 115:| 111:| 107:| 103:| 98:| 94:| 89:| 85:| 366:( 297:( 276:( 258:( 205:( 196:) 188:· 182:· 174:· 167:· 161:· 155:· 149:· 144:( 136:( 133:) 126:· 119:) 81:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
 Sandstein 
21:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Feedspot
Feedspot
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Elaenia
talk
05:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.