163:, but at the moment I'm unconvinced it's deserving of its own article. I'm also having trouble figuring out what it's saying, because it's lacking enough technical information (which means I'm having trouble believing for sure that it's factually correct information and this isn't a hoax/imaginary item). For instance, "weight" is just a description of the force due to gravity, so is this saying that the electron's had enough momentum imparted to it that it strikes a target and the impulse in the collision is five pounds of force, or is it saying that the electron's accelerated to such a speed that it has a relativistic mass with regards to the earth (I'm assuming this is going on on earth) that earth's gravity is able to impart 5 pounds of normal force on it?
17:
206:
36:
145:
This looks like garbaaaage. But are there any expert physicits around to comment on the topic prior to deletion of the stub?
164:
191:
179:
167:
151:
139:
127:
104:
92:
80:
54:
205:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a
60:
122:
160:
67:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
112:- Interesting, but contextless nonsense. How about an article on the 2.272727kg electron? --
188:
113:
101:
77:
176:
136:
50:
89:
148:
199:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
159:
This may well be a good example to include in an article like
39:
nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
209:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
187:, it's pointless. But good for a laugh.--
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
175:, now has a happy home on BJAODN.
24:
1:
44:The result of the debate was
192:16:26, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
180:14:43, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
168:16:58, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
152:10:15, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
140:04:55, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
128:09:08, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
105:09:03, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
93:07:49, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
81:07:37, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
55:00:42, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
226:
202:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
100:, nn, trivial, silly.
165:The Literate Engineer
37:Votes for Undeletion
88:, arbitrary topic.
61:Five pound electron
207:undeletion request
161:special relativity
68:special relativity
66:Trivial result of
217:
204:
125:
120:
34:
225:
224:
220:
219:
218:
216:
215:
214:
213:
200:
123:
114:
64:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
223:
221:
212:
211:
195:
194:
182:
170:
154:
142:
130:
107:
95:
83:
63:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
222:
210:
208:
203:
197:
196:
193:
190:
186:
183:
181:
178:
174:
171:
169:
166:
162:
158:
155:
153:
150:
146:
143:
141:
138:
134:
131:
129:
126:
121:
118:
111:
108:
106:
103:
99:
96:
94:
91:
87:
84:
82:
79:
75:
72:
71:
70:
69:
62:
59:
57:
56:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
201:
198:
184:
172:
156:
144:
132:
116:
109:
97:
85:
73:
65:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
189:Vertigo200
102:GTBacchus
78:Gazpacho
157:comment
135:crap --
185:Delete
177:Alphax
173:Delete
137:Rogerd
133:Delete
115:Cactus
110:Delete
98:Delete
86:Delete
74:Delete
51:Allen3
46:Delete
90:Kappa
16:<
149:Gaff
119:man
147:--
76:.
48:--
124:✍
117:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.