254:
for verification. I note that nobody has contested the mathematics behind them. I also have a Java implementation for the successive prime factors method (it's not very long) which produces the same results as what other people have on the net but I don't know where to put it (I'd be happy to email it to whoever is interested). One would think that for any group of numbers in mathematics, there is an obvious need for algorithms to find those numbers. There wasn't anything there, so I put something there which is mathematically solid. I am happy for it to be replaced with something better or more notable, but it seems a bit drastic to delete the whole article and leave a gaping hole behind. Nevertheless, it looks like I am getting a fair hearing and I will gracefully accept the decision of the umpires.
356:
is poorly referenced and seems to have OR issues of its own, so it's not surprising that it would spawn more OR. It would be appropriate to add a summary of published (in peer reviewed journals) algorithms for generating HCNs to that article, but this article doesn't seem to have that so I can't even
253:
As the author of the article, I have to admit that it is partially my own work (although I later found that similar work has been done elsewhere). This is what makes it difficult to produce citations and references. However, I provided proof and reasoning for the algorithms and that should be enough
154:
185:
Contested prod. This is a "how to" page with very poor sourcing - a mathematical equivalent of "here's my favourite apple pie recipe". No indication that these methods are notable or have produced any notable results.
148:
115:
88:
83:
92:
75:
273:
169:
136:
17:
366:
343:
322:
288:
263:
245:
228:
199:
57:
130:
126:
79:
176:
381:
36:
71:
63:
53:
380:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
212:
187:
142:
353:
236:
No independent sources. Not covered in neutral, reliable publications or websites. Sincerely, your friend,
241:
49:
339:
259:
224:
195:
162:
298:
208:
284:
216:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
362:
237:
211:
unless the algorithm (under some name) has become independently notable. Sources look like
302:
335:
318:
255:
310:
220:
191:
306:
280:
219:
seems like it's about a notable topic, but has got similar problems with sources.
109:
358:
314:
374:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
330:
to
Wikibooks. The article is valuable, but is not encyclopedic.
105:
101:
97:
161:
175:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
384:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
274:list of Science-related deletion discussions
268:
354:main article on highly composite numbers
272:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
188:Knowledge (XXG) is not a textbook
72:Finding highly composite numbers
64:Finding highly composite numbers
1:
367:19:15, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
344:21:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
58:20:15, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
323:13:30, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
289:02:39, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
264:12:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
246:20:49, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
229:15:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
200:13:04, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
401:
377:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
305:. (Edit: As well as
357:suggest a merge.--
44:The result was
291:
277:
217:composite numbers
392:
379:
278:
180:
179:
165:
113:
95:
34:
400:
399:
395:
394:
393:
391:
390:
389:
388:
382:deletion review
375:
122:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
398:
396:
387:
386:
370:
369:
332:
331:
325:
292:
266:
248:
231:
213:WP:SELFPUBLISH
183:
182:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
397:
385:
383:
378:
372:
371:
368:
364:
360:
355:
351:
348:
347:
346:
345:
341:
337:
329:
326:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
293:
290:
286:
282:
275:
271:
267:
265:
261:
257:
252:
249:
247:
243:
239:
235:
232:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
204:
203:
202:
201:
197:
193:
189:
178:
174:
171:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
128:
125:
124:Find sources:
120:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
376:
373:
349:
333:
327:
294:
269:
250:
233:
205:
184:
172:
166:
158:
151:
145:
139:
133:
123:
45:
43:
31:
28:
238:GeorgeLouis
149:free images
336:Cerebellum
256:Torkel1001
328:Transwiki
297:for both
281:• Gene93k
221:Yakushima
192:Gandalf61
50:T. Canens
299:WP:HOWTO
209:WP:HOWTO
116:View log
215:vios.
155:WP refs
143:scholar
89:protect
84:history
359:RDBury
352:: The
350:Delete
303:WP:NOR
295:Delete
234:Delete
206:Delete
127:Google
93:delete
46:delete
315:Nageh
311:WP:RS
170:JSTOR
131:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
363:talk
340:talk
319:talk
309:and
307:WP:N
301:and
285:talk
270:Note
260:talk
251:Keep
242:talk
225:talk
196:talk
163:FENS
137:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
313:.)
279:--
177:TWL
114:– (
365:)
342:)
334:--
321:)
287:)
276:.
262:)
244:)
227:)
198:)
190:.
157:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
361:(
338:(
317:(
283:(
258:(
240:(
223:(
194:(
181:)
173:·
167:·
159:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
134:·
129:(
121:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.