430:. I find that some of the information on the article may be useful in a section on early European expeditions to/or sightings of the Philippines prior to the Spanish discovery under Magellan. However, as there is no solid proof presented that the Pires expedition actually did land on one of the islands (not merely sighting them as the Portuguese also did during the
334:
might be better. Nevertheless, I have grave doubts as to whether the subject is significant enough to merit an article. We are probably never going to get more than the two quotes, because that is the whole of the evidence. Possibly
451:
I did an edit of the lede to remove the simplistic claims, but it is an interesting question, one asked about all of the "new" lands of the Age of
Discovery. I think we can have an article that provides what is known about the first
169:
339:
somewhere. This issue is that the Pope divided the world down the
Atlantic into Spanish and Portuguese zones, without realising that the world was round and they would meet on the other side of the world.
208:
Portuguese ship on the China voyage had called before at the Luções ". So that's supposed to be enough for
Knowledge to rewrite history books? To me this looks no less fringy than Menzies'
163:
95:
90:
256:
99:
82:
470:
This is ridiculous. Since when does a vague unsourced speculation merit its own
Knowledge article? What's next? Do we create articles like this for every part of the world?
235:
122:
516:
520:
306:
326:-- I do not regard this as fringe, not is the book on 1421 fringe. The two sources cites are chronicles from the period, which are primary sources, and as such
129:
528:
594:
427:
51:
210:
86:
184:
151:
431:
614:
575:
540:
498:
461:
443:
412:
395:
349:
315:
297:
269:
248:
227:
78:
70:
64:
145:
331:
141:
17:
191:
553:
486:
285:
266:
245:
60:
475:
471:
633:
40:
157:
200:
This fringe-theory article is based on a single source, and even that one source is more than shaky: " it is
345:
511:
While I am not objecting to a merge, I just want to point out that WP is filled with just such articles as
629:
536:
457:
408:
311:
56:
36:
494:
391:
223:
177:
439:
341:
293:
263:
242:
610:
403:
Of course
Menzies is fringe (well, more like fiction), but this article does not cite Menzies.
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
628:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
598:
532:
453:
404:
563:
602:
512:
490:
387:
219:
330:. This is thus NOR original research in WP terms. I do not like the present title.
218:
we also do not consider a source credible enough to overrule all other history books.
586:
568:
435:
367:
289:
281:
260:
239:
606:
590:
327:
371:
116:
55:. Any useful content may be merged at editorial discretion from the page history.
382:.” Just as Polo hasn't actually been to Japan, Pires' quote doesn't imply any
375:
363:
434:, the entire article's lead is therefore WP:OR and should be scrapped .--
379:
362:
clearly is fringe, and is universally regarded as such in academia see
524:
622:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
556:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
432:
Colonial history of the United States#Early colonial failures
515:
mockingly imagines; many of them are rather well sourced:
112:
108:
104:
176:
366:. And as for the Philippines article, the quote from
562:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
257:
list of Social science-related deletion discussions
284:which really would be no more than a paragraph in
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
636:). No further edits should be made to this page.
517:List of Westerners who visited Japan before 1868
236:list of Philippines-related deletion discussions
521:Theory of the Portuguese discovery of Australia
190:
8:
529:Pre-Columbian trans-oceanic contact theories
332:Europeans in the Philippines before Magellan
307:list of History-related deletion discussions
305:Note: This debate has been included in the
255:Note: This debate has been included in the
234:Note: This debate has been included in the
593:in it, but could be useful as a section at
304:
254:
233:
601:does not require deletion, but only that
211:1421: The Year China Discovered the World
280:Regardless of fringiness, it is plainly
595:History of the Philippines (1521–1571)
428:History of the Philippines (1521–1571)
386:sailor has been to the Philippines. --
52:History of the Philippines (1521–1571)
7:
485:top this deserves one sentence in
79:First Europeans in the Philippines
71:First Europeans in the Philippines
24:
478:, ... it's absurd. At the very,
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
531:. There are probably others.
476:First Europeans in Australia
472:First Europeans in Argentina
615:18:31, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
576:18:17, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
541:18:02, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
499:05:35, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
462:21:41, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
444:05:14, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
413:21:44, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
65:02:36, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
653:
487:History of the Philippines
396:18:55, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
350:16:52, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
316:20:39, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
298:17:16, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
286:history of the Philippines
270:09:03, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
249:08:46, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
228:06:46, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
625:Please do not modify it.
370:says no more about the “
32:Please do not modify it.
589:. This has a lot of
605:not be accorded.
578:
489:and that's it. --
318:
282:original research
272:
251:
644:
627:
585:as suggested by
573:
566:
561:
559:
557:
314:
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
34:
652:
651:
647:
646:
645:
643:
642:
641:
640:
634:deletion review
623:
579:
569:
564:
552:
550:
378:reports about “
310:
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
650:
648:
639:
638:
618:
617:
560:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
513:User:Bender235
504:
503:
502:
501:
465:
464:
446:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
353:
352:
320:
319:
301:
300:
274:
273:
252:
198:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
649:
637:
635:
631:
626:
620:
619:
616:
612:
608:
604:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
581:
580:
577:
574:
572:
567:
558:
555:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
481:
477:
473:
469:
468:
467:
466:
463:
459:
455:
450:
447:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
422:
421:
414:
410:
406:
402:
399:
398:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
364:Finlay (2004)
361:
357:
356:
355:
354:
351:
347:
343:
342:Peterkingiron
338:
333:
329:
325:
322:
321:
317:
313:
312:North America
308:
303:
302:
299:
295:
291:
288:in any case.
287:
283:
279:
276:
275:
271:
268:
265:
262:
258:
253:
250:
247:
244:
241:
237:
232:
231:
230:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
212:
207:
203:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
62:
58:
54:
53:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
624:
621:
582:
570:
551:
482:
479:
448:
423:
400:
383:
359:
336:
323:
277:
215:
209:
205:
202:quite likely
201:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
50:redirect to
49:
47:
31:
28:
533:E.M.Gregory
454:E.M.Gregory
405:E.M.Gregory
164:free images
376:Marco Polo
368:Tomé Pires
206:some other
630:talk page
599:WP:FRINGE
491:bender235
388:bender235
358:Menzies'
220:bender235
216:of course
214:, which,
57:T. Canens
37:talk page
632:or in a
603:WP:UNDUE
587:RioHondo
571:JAaron95
554:Relisted
452:contact.
436:RioHondo
384:European
290:Seyasirt
261:Eclipsed
240:Eclipsed
123:View log
39:or in a
607:Bearian
401:comment
380:Zipangu
374:” than
324:Comment
267:(email)
246:(email)
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
372:Luções
278:delete
264:(talk)
243:(talk)
142:Google
100:delete
583:Merge
525:Papar
480:very,
424:Merge
337:merge
328:WP:RS
259:. --
238:. --
204:that
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
611:talk
537:talk
495:talk
483:very
458:talk
449:Keep
440:talk
409:talk
392:talk
360:1421
346:talk
294:talk
224:talk
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
61:talk
519:,
426:to
192:TWL
121:– (
613:)
597:.
591:OR
539:)
527:,
523:,
497:)
474:,
460:)
442:)
411:)
394:)
348:)
309:.
296:)
226:)
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
63:)
609:(
565:☮
535:(
493:(
456:(
438:(
407:(
390:(
344:(
292:(
222:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
59:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.