198:, it actually looks like avsim.com might have met the criteria even closer. Unfortunately, that has been deleted, but I totally agree, if this article stays, it needs a rewrite, and a close eye on the external links section, which gets spammed by everyone else who has set up a fly-by-night flight sim web site. I'm not passionate about saving it, but I think it genuinely deserves an article. Both it and avsim have been battling it out for a while now for the title of most popular flight sim site. Both are not just a few guys with a geocities account. For example, companies that produce FS software and hardware will frequently cite reviews by both sites, and avsim holds an annual convention that is taken very seriously by Microsoft, who, if I'm not mistaken, used it to unveil their next generation flight simulator. --
124:. Do you know of reliable sources that indicate/verify notability? Articles or reviews in significant news, computer gaming, or aviation sites? Lots of hits on google but I haven't yet found anything that establishes its notability, not just its popularity. To differentiate between the two, there's the proposed policy
177:
but that is only a rough guideline. As per
Nobunaga24, it is clearly one of the most popular FS sites on the internet. It has remained, relatively unchanged for about 11 years. On that ground I think that it is weakly notable. At the same time, the article reads like an advertisment and needs a
214:
Perhaps there could be a section on the FS page for file archive sites, which are a major part of the community, which is in turn a major part of what FS is about, then flightsim.com can redirect to that.
17:
235:
36:
165:
234:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
218:
202:
182:
156:
144:
132:
116:
104:
91:
52:
48:, as this is not a vote and no credible third-party sources have been presented to verify notability. --
125:
112:- one of the most popular flight simulator sites on the internet, has been around for about 11 years.--
199:
113:
49:
68:
for a website not giving any third-party evidence for notability. I just deleetd their competitor
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
81:
65:
195:
174:
77:
88:
58:
153:
129:
215:
179:
141:
101:
85:
69:
228:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
166:Microsoft Flight Simulator: Community involvement
238:). No further edits should be made to this page.
128:. While it's only proposed, it gives an idea.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
76:unless third party sources show
194:- looking at the criteria for
173:does not meet the critera for
1:
219:01:54, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
203:00:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
183:00:11, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
157:11:25, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
145:16:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
133:06:55, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
117:01:32, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
105:17:12, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
92:12:50, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
53:11:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
255:
231:Please do not modify it.
72:as an uncontested prod.
32:Please do not modify it.
164:useful parts into
246:
233:
152:per Nobunaga24.
34:
254:
253:
249:
248:
247:
245:
244:
243:
242:
236:deletion review
229:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
252:
250:
241:
240:
225:
224:
223:
222:
221:
206:
205:
186:
185:
159:
147:
135:
119:
107:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
251:
239:
237:
232:
226:
220:
217:
213:
210:
209:
208:
207:
204:
201:
197:
193:
190:
189:
188:
187:
184:
181:
176:
172:
171:
167:
163:
160:
158:
155:
151:
148:
146:
143:
139:
136:
134:
131:
127:
123:
120:
118:
115:
111:
108:
106:
103:
99:
96:
95:
94:
93:
90:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
60:
59:Flightsim.com
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
230:
227:
211:
191:
169:
168:
161:
149:
137:
121:
109:
97:
84:compliance.
73:
63:
50:Sam Blanning
45:
43:
31:
28:
126:WP:SOFTWARE
200:Nobunaga24
114:Nobunaga24
64:Contested
178:rewrite.
170:Weak Keep
140:per nom.
100:per nom.
70:Avsim.com
212:comment
192:comment
154:Cynical
130:Gotyear
122:Comment
82:WP:CORP
66:WP:PROD
216:Mozzie
196:WP:WEB
180:Mozzie
175:WP:WEB
142:Vectro
138:Delete
102:Recury
98:Delete
78:WP:WEB
74:Delete
46:delete
162:Merge
86:Kusma
16:<
150:Keep
110:Keep
89:(討論)
80:or
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.