563:- It's a really horrible idea to let WP content (or lack thereof) be controlled by the subjects themselves. There should be a brick wall between the whims of subjects and the actual content of the encyclopedia. Anthony and I have disagreed on this vehemently for a long time and will continue to disagree vehemently on this. We are not here for "courtesy content for marginally notable people." Notable is notable. Non-notable is non-notable. Now somebody needs to shut this sucker down, the nomination is withdrawn.
514:
I take the opposite view. If the subject is marginally notable (whether or not they're a
Knowledge (XXG) insider) we should take into account their feelings on the matter. But yes, we should be consistent. If we extend this courtesy to insiders, we should treat non-Wikipedians with the same level of
417:
which indicates that on May 16, 2008, Ms. Devouard was awarded the national award "Chevalier of the Ordre national du Mérite," which would seem to suffice... "Mme
Devouard, née Nibart (Florence, Jacqueline, Sylvie), présidente d'une fondation mondiale ; 15 ans d'activités professionnelles." is the
212:
Failure to meet the
General Notability Guideline. This biography came up in a Wikipediocracy thread as an "inside baseball" type BLP of a former chair of the WMF Trustees which is not supported or supportable by substantial coverage in multiple, independently-published sources of presumed
537:
Of course. I see no reason "not" to take the opinion into consideration, but I do not feel that they get to decide their own inclusion, especially when they are a
Wikipedian. This is only going to cause negativity for Knowledge (XXG) which already comes under fire for its editing issues.
213:
reliability. After a glance at the first 100 or so responses in a Google search, I tend to agree with this assessment. No strong feelings here, I leave the matter of decision to the community — I just don't want to be accused of looking the other way on a WP insider's bio.
385:
Lih's book is not enough for me, and would be a very poor test. Per nom and navel gazing. I don't see much difference in deleting this now, or in a year's time, voting to salt "Tim from
Davenport" or wherever. But per Tim from Davenport in this earth shaking vote.
358:
362:
181:
500:
Wait, what? If she is notable, then she is notable. Giving a "Wikipedian" special favors when it comes to notability and not others speaks wonders for the "integrity" of
Knowledge (XXG). --
134:
175:
141:
474:. We extend this favour to Wikipedians with marginal notability. (Not marginally notable non-Wikipedians, though. We take care of our own.) --
107:
102:
111:
293:
She appears in numerous books in her role as
Foundation head and was knighted by the French government for this. She therefore passes
524:
483:
94:
17:
256:. Tried to find something that was in depth but came up empty. I am willing to change my !vote if someone can show me different. --
418:
official wording. So while the keep argument based on GNG is very, very borderline, this is actually a fairly definite SNG Keep.
406:
196:
53:
163:
528:
487:
414:
591:
40:
411:"The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times."
157:
302:
236:
368:
by
Claudia Fisher and Christine Vallaster, but that strikes me as mere passing mention. What else is out there?
572:
547:
532:
509:
491:
462:
444:
427:
395:
377:
343:
320:
306:
285:
265:
240:
222:
76:
153:
71:
520:
479:
98:
203:
587:
36:
298:
232:
189:
543:
505:
261:
65:
169:
568:
516:
475:
440:
423:
373:
333:
That's so cruel. He's lovely. And he likes to keep things. Your a hayter and you make me cry.
281:
218:
90:
82:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
586:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
294:
59:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
459:
340:
361:
is the link for Lih's book, which counts as 1 towards GNG for my money. I see that she was
253:
249:
391:
316:
248:- Not understanding the "Grill" power remark, but I guess I don't have to. This bio fails
539:
501:
435:- I see the same document is already in the English footnotes, too, as fn 9. My bad.
257:
564:
436:
419:
369:
277:
214:
128:
454:
335:
231:
per Randy
Framboise/Carrite, who said it better than I ever could. Grill power!
387:
312:
311:
Note Andrew D. is vastly likely a troll account, given recent form.
580:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
452:
Navel gazing. Inside baseball. No notability outside wikipedia.
471:
124:
120:
116:
188:
202:
413:Her biography on French Knowledge (XXG) points to
54:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (people)#Any_biography
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
594:). No further edits should be made to this page.
273:- I do see significant passing mention in Lih's
8:
52:. Carrite withdrew this nomination due to
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
403:Withdrawing Nomination — Speedy Keep
56:providing rationale for inclusion.
24:
407:SNG for "All Biographies" No. 1
275:The Knowledge (XXG) Revolution.
1:
573:07:04, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
548:00:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
533:00:16, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
510:00:07, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
492:00:02, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
463:15:04, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
445:15:45, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
428:15:35, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
409:indicates a keep based on:
396:15:13, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
378:12:08, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
344:15:10, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
321:15:22, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
307:09:57, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
286:01:37, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
266:23:23, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
241:22:51, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
223:22:42, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
77:10:56, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
611:
583:Please do not modify it.
363:interviewed for the book
32:Please do not modify it.
468:Leave it up to Florence
366:Connective Branding
91:Florence Devouard
83:Florence Devouard
63:
60:non-admin closure
602:
585:
470:, as we did for
461:
457:
342:
338:
207:
206:
192:
144:
132:
114:
74:
68:
57:
34:
610:
609:
605:
604:
603:
601:
600:
599:
598:
592:deletion review
581:
455:
453:
336:
334:
233:Roberta Benigni
149:
140:
105:
89:
86:
72:
66:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
608:
606:
597:
596:
576:
575:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
495:
494:
465:
447:
430:
399:
398:
380:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
326:
325:
324:
323:
288:
268:
243:
210:
209:
146:
85:
80:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
607:
595:
593:
589:
584:
578:
577:
574:
570:
566:
562:
559:
558:
549:
545:
541:
536:
535:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
513:
512:
511:
507:
503:
499:
498:
497:
496:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
466:
464:
460:
458:
451:
448:
446:
442:
438:
434:
431:
429:
425:
421:
416:
412:
408:
404:
401:
400:
397:
393:
389:
384:
381:
379:
375:
371:
367:
364:
360:
356:
353:
352:
345:
341:
339:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
322:
318:
314:
310:
309:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
289:
287:
283:
279:
276:
272:
269:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
244:
242:
238:
234:
230:
227:
226:
225:
224:
220:
216:
205:
201:
198:
195:
191:
187:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
155:
152:
151:Find sources:
147:
143:
139:
136:
130:
126:
122:
118:
113:
109:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
87:
84:
81:
79:
78:
75:
70:
69:
61:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
582:
579:
560:
517:Anthonyhcole
476:Anthonyhcole
467:
449:
432:
410:
402:
382:
365:
354:
290:
274:
270:
245:
228:
211:
199:
193:
185:
178:
172:
166:
160:
150:
137:
64:
49:
47:
31:
28:
515:respect. --
176:free images
73:(indicate)
67:Rcsprinter
588:talk page
299:Andrew D.
50:withdrawn
37:talk page
590:or in a
540:CNMall41
525:contribs
502:CNMall41
484:contribs
258:CNMall41
135:View log
39:or in a
565:Carrite
561:Comment
437:Carrite
433:Comment
420:Carrite
370:Carrite
355:Comment
295:WP:PROF
278:Carrite
271:Comment
215:Carrite
182:WP refs
170:scholar
108:protect
103:history
456:Begoon
450:Delete
383:Delete
337:Begoon
254:WP:BIO
250:WP:GNG
246:Delete
229:Delete
154:Google
112:delete
529:email
488:email
472:Kevin
388:Ceoil
313:Ceoil
197:JSTOR
158:books
142:Stats
129:views
121:watch
117:links
16:<
569:talk
544:talk
521:talk
506:talk
480:talk
441:talk
424:talk
415:THIS
392:talk
374:talk
359:HERE
317:talk
303:talk
291:Keep
282:talk
262:talk
252:and
237:talk
219:talk
190:FENS
164:news
125:logs
99:talk
95:edit
531:)
490:)
204:TWL
133:– (
571:)
546:)
538:--
527:·
523:·
508:)
486:·
482:·
443:)
426:)
405:—
394:)
376:)
357:-
319:)
305:)
297:.
284:)
264:)
239:)
221:)
184:)
127:|
123:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
567:(
542:(
519:(
504:(
478:(
439:(
422:(
390:(
372:(
315:(
301:(
280:(
260:(
235:(
217:(
208:)
200:·
194:·
186:·
179:·
173:·
167:·
161:·
156:(
148:(
145:)
138:·
131:)
93:(
62:)
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.