227:, complete with the requisite self-promotional link to the Knowledge (XXG) article in the upper right corner of the site. Outside of breaking one story, this blog was entirely non-notable, and only the wayback machine allows us to see that. There is a bit of coverage on the one story in the first three references, and a single mention in the fourth reference, but no substantive coverage at all.
348:, in which quite a few editors are arguing the opposite. FWIW, I support retention of that article, because of far more substantial coverage. It looks to be headed for deletion, and there's a lot more discussion of that than this, with passing mentions in two articles in the same newspaper (the
196:
are all passing mentions of this blog. I have searched for sources and have been unable to find any. Since "Florida News" is a search term that returns many unrelated terms, I may have missed coverage about this blog. If at least two nontrivial reliable sources about this blog are found, I will
312:), has more than a passing mention of the blog. (The fourth link is a dead link to the post, in the blog's previous incarnation). FWIW, one has to work to get to that blog post, since the Internet Archive has no direct links to the December 2004 version of the blog.
223:
posts, dating from May — July 2007; what the article discusses is a blog which apparently was at that site earlier. (Blogspot seems to allow domains to be reused from time to time). The
Internet archive's last entry for the blog described is from June 26, 2006
219:, it is safe to say that the passing mentions of this blog do not convey sufficient coverage. What is currently at the linked URL is not even the blog that the article discusses; what is currently there has only
151:
181:
I have removed the speedy from the article, since notability is asserted by the presence of multiple sources. Furthermore, this article has existed since 2005, so a discussion is warranted to determine if it's
307:
One of the sources mentions the blog in a single sentence, another mentions that the blog was the first to report a story (in a single sentence); only one (an interview with the blogger which appeared in
112:
267:
145:
345:
216:
330:
If it was noted for being the first to break a story, and other media sat down for an interview with the blogger, that's a pretty good case for notability.
383:. As Horologium points out it has not "been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself."--
17:
390:
85:
80:
89:
166:
72:
133:
410:
36:
215:. I was the editor who added the speedy delete tag. Judging by the rather novel standards being used for websites at
409:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
335:
296:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
127:
123:
395:
365:
339:
325:
300:
282:
278:
257:
240:
225:
206:
193:
54:
76:
185:
387:
361:
321:
253:
236:
173:
331:
292:
189:
159:
68:
60:
198:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
274:
202:
380:
384:
354:
314:
249:
229:
139:
184:
Even though there are multiple sources, none of them are enough to establish notability.
291:. Looks like the article has four sources, I'd say that's pretty good for a blog.
106:
50:
403:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
102:
98:
94:
352:), and a blog interview in a free alternative weekly.
158:
172:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
413:). No further edits should be made to this page.
346:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Zombietime
217:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Zombietime
268:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
8:
262:
266:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
379:. This defunct blog clearly fails
24:
344:You might want to take a look at
396:15:05, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
366:15:48, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
340:15:41, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
326:15:33, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
301:14:57, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
283:02:25, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
258:00:33, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
241:23:02, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
207:21:42, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
55:18:17, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
1:
430:
406:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
350:St. Petersburg Times
197:withdraw this AfD.
248:per Horologium. --
44:The result was
393:
364:
324:
285:
271:
239:
421:
408:
391:
360:
357:
320:
317:
310:Creative Loafing
272:
235:
232:
177:
176:
162:
110:
92:
34:
429:
428:
424:
423:
422:
420:
419:
418:
417:
411:deletion review
404:
355:
315:
230:
119:
83:
67:
64:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
427:
425:
416:
415:
399:
398:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
332:Squidfryerchef
304:
303:
293:Squidfryerchef
286:
260:
243:
180:
179:
116:
63:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
426:
414:
412:
407:
401:
400:
397:
394:
388:
386:
382:
378:
375:
374:
367:
363:
359:
358:
351:
347:
343:
342:
341:
337:
333:
329:
328:
327:
323:
319:
318:
311:
306:
305:
302:
298:
294:
290:
287:
284:
280:
276:
269:
265:
261:
259:
255:
251:
247:
244:
242:
238:
234:
233:
226:
222:
218:
214:
211:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
195:
191:
187:
175:
171:
168:
165:
161:
157:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
129:
125:
122:
121:Find sources:
117:
114:
108:
104:
100:
96:
91:
87:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
65:
62:
59:
57:
56:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
405:
402:
376:
353:
349:
313:
309:
288:
263:
245:
228:
220:
212:
194:this article
190:this article
186:This article
183:
169:
163:
155:
148:
142:
136:
130:
120:
69:Florida News
61:Florida News
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
275:Ron Ritzman
146:free images
385:Cúchullain
356:Horologium
316:Horologium
250:JohnnyB256
231:Horologium
182:notable.
113:View log
152:WP refs
140:scholar
86:protect
81:history
381:WP:WEB
377:Delete
362:(talk)
322:(talk)
246:Delete
237:(talk)
213:Delete
199:Cunard
192:, and
124:Google
90:delete
46:delete
167:JSTOR
128:books
107:views
99:watch
95:links
16:<
336:talk
297:talk
289:Keep
279:talk
264:Note
254:talk
203:talk
160:FENS
134:news
103:logs
77:talk
73:edit
51:Tone
273:--
174:TWL
111:– (
338:)
299:)
281:)
270:.
256:)
221:13
205:)
188:,
154:)
105:|
101:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
79:|
75:|
48:.
392:c
389:/
334:(
295:(
277:(
252:(
201:(
178:)
170:·
164:·
156:·
149:·
143:·
137:·
131:·
126:(
118:(
115:)
109:)
71:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.