Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Floyd C. Bayne - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

542:
lessons Knowledge (XXG)'s purpose. I understand Knowledge (XXG) not listing someone like me who has been covered and interviewed by the media many times. But Floyd Bayne could be the next elected Representative of hundreds of thousands of People. Plus there are only 12 more days until the Congressional Election. To delete Floyd Bayne now, put's his opponents with a higher advantage. Deleting Floyd Bayne could also be in violation of Federal Election Laws since Knowledge (XXG) could be considered, if it is not already, a news source which I believe would fall into the category of having to follow Federal Election Laws that require equal time and coverage for ALL CANDIDATES. Joe Cacciotti
863:, a Reliable Source. That kind of coverage is unusual for a third-party candidate and might push him over the line to notable. All the rest of the "references" cited are to his website, and I couldn't find anything significant at Google News. If J.D. Hunt knows of "many secondary source News Papers and Tv stations interviewing him", now is the time to show us links to those interviews. If the consensus is non-notable, then redirect per usual practice; that will preserve the article's history so it can be recreated if he wins or becomes more notable in the future. -- 635:
challenge to Eric Cantor, Republican Whip in the House of Representatives, has forced the incumbent to dramatically alter his plans for the election season, which were initially to promote his book and his party as he easily won re-election in his 70% conservative district. Instead the candidate has been spending resources and time to defend his seat. That means the dialog on the national level has also been changed by this candidate. There is ample and significant press coverage of this candidate to justify his inclusion in this category.
483:. And I am sure he only listed the ones he considered faltering to himself, because there are additional many unflattering ones about him. He was also invited and appeared as a guest to the first annual Virginia Tea Party Convention alongside Lou Dobbs, Ron Paul and many other Tea Party notables. If you guys say this guy isn't notable then you must be working for Cantor. I don't see you wanting to delete Rick Waugh, democrat's Knowledge (XXG) page and he is less notable than Floyd Bayne. 476: 472: 788:). That's simply wrong, as a nominee notable even for an event still has notable information - it's just a question of where it belongs. There is no evidence of any actual merge of material in her case, which makes the election article shockingly unbalanced (aka Undue Weight). There seems to be a lot of confusion on the definition of 'merge' in these discussions. It is 443:- This candidate is very notable. When you search his name at least 20 search pages on Google from various third party sources come up. He is sited in articles that are from papers all over this district, as well as mentions in major national websites like Redstate.com, and there are even international articles about about Mr. Bayne and his part in the race. 881:
Melanie, the article is entirely in the context of the election. The headline is "Opponent criticizes Cantor's TARP support." For me, this is far below the bar of significant coverage required by GNG if a candidate fails WP:POLITICAN. Your mileage may vary, but I think this is an insignificant fringe
775:
for an example of the opposite, showing no history at all of what was in the previous article. That article was actually deleted, then a redirect was added after the fact. That's why it's wrong to do deletes in these cases, and that's been the consensus achieved in many, many AfD requests for various
541:
Isn't the purpose of Knowledge (XXG) to provide informational sources? To delete a person (Floyd Bayne) who has attained significant media coverage, and who has the attention of thousands of people who Floyd has spoken too and the people who have sought him out researching who he is, in my opinion
634:
This candidate is significant and notable. As a "tea party" type candidate who is challenging the 2nd most powerful Republican representative in the Federal government, Bayne has received a significant amount of coverage, and has drastically altered the political conversations in Virginia. His
913:
Ray do you know how to use Google? This candidate has gotten more than one write up in more than a dozen papers, as well as a write up in national, frequently sited redstate.com, and international press stemming from him being the only candidate for the Virginia Tea Party Convention with
421:
Ray quit embarasing yourself. You are showing that you are either biased with an agenda to delete this article or you can't read Floyd Bayne has dozens of writeups in many different newspappers and has been on all the District Television stations.
763:.)That's why these Merge Templates exist, and that's why they're (normally) used when the issue involves (but not necessarily limited to) a claim that a person is notable only for one event. If consensus is reached, then an actual 858:
Generally a candidate is considered non-notable if the only news coverage s/he gets is about the election, that is, the "horse race". But Bayne has been the subject of at least one in-depth article specifically about him, in the
836:
doing the redirect, particularly so close to the election date. It's disingenuous to the election date is immaterial in the case of election-related articles. At Knowledge (XXG) we Assume Good Faith, and that's part of it.
810:
A redirect is functionally the same as a merge - anybody who wishes to can merge from the article history. Discussions about whether an article should exist on its own tend to come here. And this one clearly doesn't.
610:
The argument that the subject is notable is one thing; the argument that the subject must be granted "equal time and coverage" assumes that Knowledge (XXG) is a platform for election candidate biographies. It is not.
160: 758:
all those involved in both articles, and discuss the issue until consensus is reached. There's no need for a rush to judgement in any of these cases. (Note: One person requesting a Merge is not a consensus, see
986: 961: 307: 284: 211:
Gobono this article isn't about Cantor not debating. It is about the very notable Floyd who has dozens of search pages with many secondary source News Papers and Tv stations interviewing him about the race.
336: 328: 918:
and other tea party notables. Dude I am trying to assume good faith, but you are not looking at proof of notability, which is leading me to think you have a dog in this race aka an agenda.
316: 471:. WRVA, the Districts top talk/news/political station has had Floyd featured on the Morning Show at least once and the Most listened to Afternoon Show with Doc Thompson Twice; here is 115: 259: 287:. When the article says "family man" in the opening sentence you know it doesn't have much going for it. A fringe candidate who should be redirected to the election page as 233: 154: 792:
a synonym for a redirect. There are two steps, and both must be taken. Or, the article should be allowed to continue to exist, with 'improvement tags' added as needed.
332: 320: 324: 312: 515: 195:. The article's references are not sufficient to establish notability and a search didn't reveal more than passing mentions of Cantor's refusal to debate him. 479:. This is from Mr Bayne's News Blog, but it gives a list of many independent news sources that talk about Floyd Bayne in the Virginia 7th District Race right 339:). Three of the five sources are from the subject's own website and the other two are from a local paper in the context of routine election coverage. 120: 1069:
How was this deleted there were more keep (no deletes) than deletes.This is supposed to be voted on. the ones with the most votes wins
689: 557: 1076: 1016: 940: 925: 900: 597: 596:
Who is arguing that Knowledge (XXG) is a soapbox or advertising platform for political candidates? We are arguing that he is notable.
423: 88: 83: 17: 576:
applies to broadcast media; however, Knowledge (XXG) is not a soapbox or advertising platform for political candidates anyway. (See
553: 92: 685: 666: 75: 203: 175: 650:
THIS IS GARBAGE. ERIC CANTOR IS JUST HAVING HIS OPPONENTS' PROFILES TAKEN DOWN. JUST ANOTHER DIRTY TRICK FROM ERIC CANTOR.
142: 394:
Please. Third party candidate who manages a press writeup or three, but has no chance of election? This is the very thing
1059: 36: 311:
per Mkativerata. Precedent in other articles of the same substance suggests that this is the appropriate action (e.g.
480: 577: 136: 1058:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
464: 406:
were set up to prevent. Give him a sentence or so in the article on the election proper, and get rid of it.
1084: 1072: 1044: 1024: 1008: 973: 948: 933: 921: 908: 892: 872: 846: 821: 801: 734: 713: 670: 654: 644: 620: 605: 589: 561: 549: 527: 506: 492: 452: 431: 416: 403: 385: 369: 348: 300: 288: 274: 248: 221: 205: 132: 57: 1080: 1020: 944: 929: 904: 842: 797: 785: 709: 681: 662: 601: 460: 427: 296: 545: 182: 969: 677: 658: 722:
No, he was not. He is a candidate of the Independent Green Party and got on the ballot by petition.
399: 1039: 1003: 860: 751: 723: 459:
Floyd Bayne has been covered twice by one of the district's most watched televison WTVR CBS News 6
168: 79: 890: 868: 819: 730: 640: 616: 585: 523: 468: 414: 381: 367: 344: 201: 990: 939:
Also Ray many have given links to many top TV Stations in the state that have covered Mr. Bayne.
395: 838: 793: 747: 705: 497:
my mistake on Waugh's page the last time I checked there was no attempt to delete Ricks page.
270: 244: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
502: 488: 448: 292: 217: 148: 53: 192: 965: 573: 1031: 995: 71: 63: 884: 864: 813: 781: 726: 636: 612: 581: 519: 408: 377: 361: 340: 196: 376:
Disagree with this opinion. Notability exists, as others have pointed out (below).
768: 266: 240: 882:
candidate who's managed maybe one or two press writeups in a very political year.
109: 498: 484: 444: 213: 49: 987:
United States House of Representatives elections in Virginia, 2010#District 7
962:
United States House of Representatives elections in Virginia, 2010#District 7
308:
United States House of Representatives elections in Virginia, 2010#District 7
285:
United States House of Representatives elections in Virginia, 2010#District 7
915: 767:
rather than a simple delete, or even a delete and redirect, is done. See
746:. This request is taking the wrong path. The proper path is to use the 337:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Ann Marie Buerkle (Politician)
1015:
Abductive, he isn't a losing candidate the election isn't decided.
1052:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
899:
Ray you are wrong this article does not qualify as non-notable
329:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Mike Kelly (Pennsylvania)
317:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Rami Bader (politician)
772: 760: 105: 101: 97: 167: 776:
political candidates over the years. An example of a
467:, and featured on the other bigest WWBT NBC News 12 564:
comment was added at 03:14, 23 October 2010 (UTC).
333:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Lisa Johnston
321:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Naheed Nenshi
181: 828:No, imo the person who does the redirect has the 325:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Billy Coyle 313:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Craig Weber 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 1062:). No further edits should be made to this page. 516:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Rick Waugh 260:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions 359:per above. No notability exists or is likely. 993:, the 1E being his being a losing candidate. 234:list of Virginia-related deletion discussions 8: 1029:I will bet you one miillllion dollarssss. 254: 228: 258:: This debate has been included in the 232:: This debate has been included in the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 352:edited 20:34, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 560:outside this topic. The preceding 24: 964:. He will be notable if he wins. 191:Non-notable candidate that fails 1: 1085:04:57, 28 October 2010 (UTC) 1045:01:17, 27 October 2010 (UTC) 1025:00:20, 27 October 2010 (UTC) 1009:22:46, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 974:20:13, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 949:19:56, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 934:19:53, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 909:19:47, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 893:16:29, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 873:15:58, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 847:17:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 822:16:29, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 802:15:35, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 771:for an example of this. See 735:15:58, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 714:15:35, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 671:01:18, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 645:17:34, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 621:04:21, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 606:04:04, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 590:03:50, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 578:Knowledge (XXG):Five pillars 528:03:19, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 507:02:01, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 493:01:26, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 453:00:59, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 432:00:25, 27 October 2010 (UTC) 417:16:24, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 386:17:40, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 370:22:50, 18 October 2010 (UTC) 349:02:46, 18 October 2010 (UTC) 301:02:42, 18 October 2010 (UTC) 275:02:29, 18 October 2010 (UTC) 249:02:29, 18 October 2010 (UTC) 222:01:56, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 206:02:00, 18 October 2010 (UTC) 58:10:33, 27 October 2010 (UTC) 1102: 704:in the primary election. 291:explicitly prescribes. -- 1055:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 861:Richmond Times Dispatch 832:to merge the material 475:and here is the other 700:at this time. He was 690:few or no other edits 558:few or no other edits 830:moral responsibility 692:outside this topic. 983:Delete and Redirect 761:Ed Potosnak example 752:Template:Merge from 889: 818: 413: 366: 44:The result was 1075:comment added by 924:comment added by 883: 812: 773:Ann Marie Buerkle 765:merge of material 748:Template:Merge to 693: 674: 657:comment added by 565: 407: 360: 353: 277: 263: 251: 237: 1093: 1087: 1057: 1043: 1036: 1007: 1000: 936: 887: 816: 675: 673: 651: 543: 411: 364: 351: 264: 238: 199: 186: 185: 171: 123: 113: 95: 34: 1101: 1100: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1070: 1066: 1060:deletion review 1053: 1032: 1030: 996: 994: 960:or redirect to 919: 885: 814: 784:(AfD consensus 652: 574:equal-time rule 409: 362: 283:or redirect to 197: 128: 119: 86: 70: 67: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1099: 1097: 1089: 1088: 1065: 1064: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1012: 1011: 976: 954: 953: 952: 951: 937: 911: 896: 895: 876: 875: 852: 851: 850: 849: 825: 824: 805: 804: 740: 739: 738: 737: 717: 716: 648: 647: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 593: 592: 567: 566: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 456: 455: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 389: 388: 373: 372: 354: 303: 278: 252: 225: 224: 189: 188: 125: 121:AfD statistics 72:Floyd C. Bayne 66: 64:Floyd C. Bayne 61: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1098: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1068: 1067: 1063: 1061: 1056: 1050: 1046: 1041: 1037: 1035: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1013: 1010: 1005: 1001: 999: 992: 988: 984: 980: 977: 975: 971: 967: 963: 959: 956: 955: 950: 946: 942: 938: 935: 931: 927: 923: 917: 912: 910: 906: 902: 898: 897: 894: 891: 888: 880: 879: 878: 877: 874: 870: 866: 862: 857: 854: 853: 848: 844: 840: 835: 831: 827: 826: 823: 820: 817: 809: 808: 807: 806: 803: 799: 795: 791: 787: 783: 782:Lisa Johnston 779: 774: 770: 766: 762: 757: 753: 749: 745: 742: 741: 736: 732: 728: 724: 721: 720: 719: 718: 715: 711: 707: 703: 699: 696: 695: 694: 691: 687: 683: 679: 672: 668: 664: 660: 656: 646: 642: 638: 633: 630: 629: 622: 618: 614: 609: 608: 607: 603: 599: 595: 594: 591: 587: 583: 579: 575: 571: 570: 569: 568: 563: 559: 555: 551: 547: 540: 537: 536: 529: 525: 521: 517: 514:. Please see 513: 510: 509: 508: 504: 500: 496: 495: 494: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 457: 454: 450: 446: 442: 439: 433: 429: 425: 420: 419: 418: 415: 412: 405: 404:WP:POLITICIAN 401: 397: 393: 392: 391: 390: 387: 383: 379: 375: 374: 371: 368: 365: 358: 355: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 310: 309: 304: 302: 298: 294: 290: 289:WP:POLITICIAN 286: 282: 279: 276: 272: 268: 261: 257: 253: 250: 246: 242: 235: 231: 227: 226: 223: 219: 215: 210: 209: 208: 207: 204: 202: 200: 194: 184: 180: 177: 174: 170: 166: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 138: 134: 131: 130:Find sources: 126: 122: 117: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 90: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 68: 65: 62: 60: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 1077:96.228.59.55 1054: 1051: 1033: 1017:96.228.59.55 997: 982: 978: 957: 941:96.228.59.55 926:96.228.59.55 901:96.228.59.55 855: 839:Flatterworld 833: 829: 794:Flatterworld 789: 780:redirect is 777: 769:Scott Harper 764: 755: 743: 706:Flatterworld 701: 697: 649: 631: 598:96.228.59.55 538: 511: 440: 424:96.228.59.55 356: 306:Redirect to 305: 280: 255: 229: 190: 178: 172: 164: 157: 151: 145: 139: 129: 45: 43: 31: 28: 1071:—Preceding 920:—Preceding 754:templates, 688:) has made 653:—Preceding 556:) has made 546:98.191.6.57 293:Mkativerata 155:free images 966:The Eskimo 678:Richmonder 659:Richmonder 499:J. D. Hunt 485:J. D. Hunt 445:J. D. Hunt 400:WP:NOTNEWS 214:J. D. Hunt 1040:reasoning 1034:Abductive 1004:reasoning 998:Abductive 916:Lou Dobbs 856:Weak keep 778:non-merge 267:• Gene93k 241:• Gene93k 1073:unsigned 991:WP:BLP1E 922:unsigned 865:MelanieN 727:MelanieN 686:contribs 667:contribs 655:unsigned 637:Squ1rr3l 613:Location 582:Location 562:unsigned 554:contribs 520:Location 396:WP:BLP1E 378:Squ1rr3l 357:Redirect 341:Location 198:Gobonobo 116:View log 744:COMMENT 702:elected 512:Comment 161:WP refs 149:scholar 89:protect 84:history 989:under 979:Delete 958:Delete 834:before 756:invite 402:, and 281:Delete 193:WP:BIO 133:Google 93:delete 50:Stifle 46:delete 176:JSTOR 137:books 110:views 102:watch 98:links 16:< 1081:talk 1021:talk 970:talk 945:talk 930:talk 905:talk 869:talk 843:talk 798:talk 786:here 750:and 731:talk 710:talk 698:KEEP 682:talk 663:talk 641:talk 632:Keep 617:talk 602:talk 586:talk 572:The 550:talk 539:Keep 524:talk 503:talk 489:talk 481:here 469:here 465:here 463:and 461:here 449:talk 441:Keep 428:talk 382:talk 345:talk 297:talk 271:talk 256:Note 245:talk 230:Note 218:talk 169:FENS 143:news 106:logs 80:talk 76:edit 54:talk 985:to 981:or 886:Ray 815:Ray 790:not 580:.) 477:one 473:one 410:Ray 363:Ray 265:-- 239:-- 183:TWL 118:• 114:– ( 1083:) 1023:) 972:) 947:) 932:) 907:) 871:) 845:) 800:) 733:) 725:-- 712:) 684:• 676:— 669:) 665:• 643:) 619:) 604:) 588:) 552:• 544:— 526:) 518:. 505:) 491:) 451:) 430:) 398:, 384:) 347:) 335:, 331:, 327:, 323:, 319:, 315:, 299:) 273:) 262:. 247:) 236:. 220:) 163:) 108:| 104:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 82:| 78:| 56:) 48:. 1079:( 1042:) 1038:( 1019:( 1006:) 1002:( 968:( 943:( 928:( 903:( 867:( 841:( 796:( 729:( 708:( 680:( 661:( 639:( 615:( 600:( 584:( 548:( 522:( 501:( 487:( 447:( 426:( 380:( 343:( 295:( 269:( 243:( 216:( 187:) 179:· 173:· 165:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 140:· 135:( 127:( 124:) 112:) 74:( 52:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Stifle
talk
10:33, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Floyd C. Bayne
Floyd C. Bayne
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
AfD statistics
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:BIO
Gobonobo

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.