190:, but your comment about it's lack of notability because "anyone can simply copy the original code and start a new project claiming that significant improvements are underway" reminds me a lot of Knowledge (XXG). Hehehe... Moving on then: The article is well written; concise, lucid, and understandable to someone who doesn't deal with a lot of open source programs. As for the notability, I would say this article is notable because it appears to be making quite a few differences between it and the original
249:(btw, what it is, is just a search portal) are not legitimate to establish notability. That leaves us with no reliable secondary sources for the topic, which is the working definition of non-notability. The article is a stub, so I'm not sure what kind of grading scale you are using to call it well-written, other than perhaps to suggest that it isn't patent nonsense, which I agree with, but which does not solve the issue of notability.
194:("such as a 32-bit, flat memory-model, optimized Input/Output, support for many file systems, compatibility layers and support for modern standards, amongst others"). Note: I would think that this kind of notability would be rare because as said earlier, it is a variant of an open source program. But! that brings me to my next point: "no reliabe sources" -
248:
is "unconnected" is good for a chuckle, but otherwise I'd assume that the interest of FreeDOS's author is not independent of the fact that he created the original (not that a simple news blurb would qualify as coverage anyway). As you admit, forums, primary sources, and certainly "whatever" sites
273:
Well written in the sense that is 1) not patent nonsense and 2) clear. To me, the article makes sense. Thanks for the correction for the sources, it is much appreciated. But, I'm sure this article deserves a place, and I think I can argue you on the notability factor; wouldn't having obtuse
143:); being open source, anyone can simply copy the original code and start a new project claiming that significant improvements are underway. This fork has no sources and no notability.
199:
132:
278:
notable? (or does that fall under "notability is not inherited"?) And again, even if it doesn't get it's own article, could at least get a merge with the original
240:
Any site can copy
Knowledge (XXG), which does not make them notable for it. Making (or more accurately, claiming to be making) changes to a work is not a tenet of
17:
307:. No attribution of notability to independent sources. It's not even a fork of FreeDOS, just a different platform implementation. --
323:
Article fails WP:N. No reliable, independent sources. Whether or not it is a good product or a good article is immaterial.
99:
94:
103:
372:
36:
86:
172:
214:
an open source project, and the forum yields posts about the progress of the project from the programmers), and
371:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
287:
231:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
254:
148:
244:. Notability requires significant coverage by reliable independent sources. Suggesting that the original
60:
357:
332:
315:
291:
258:
235:
178:
152:
68:
195:
166:
90:
283:
227:
312:
82:
74:
203:
328:
250:
219:
187:
144:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
274:
differences from the original make it notable in that it is a variant of an item that
241:
162:
49:
353:
308:
207:
324:
120:
215:
344:
until more reliable sources are found. A good discussion of why can be found
139:
Contested prod, no reason given. Unreleased fork of open-source software (
349:
341:
279:
245:
191:
140:
53:
52:. If you want a copy of this article to include information in the
365:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
345:
226:
reliable as others, because it is not a secondary source.
127:
116:
112:
108:
198:. I wholeheartedly disagree sir; Google brings up
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
375:). No further edits should be made to this page.
210:(I know forums are not a legit source, but this
8:
208:dedicated to it's history and progress
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
222:, I will admit that it might not be
204:original, unconnected FreeDOS site
24:
1:
392:
358:13:30, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
333:06:25, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
316:03:58, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
292:03:57, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
259:03:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
236:03:27, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
186:— Not to poke fun at you
179:03:08, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
153:02:23, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
368:Please do not modify it.
69:21:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
165:, no reliable sources.
56:article, let me know.
220:listed on the article
216:whatever this site is
218:. As for the site
44:The result was
67:
48:as not asserting
383:
370:
206:, a small forum
202:, including the
200:quite a few hits
175:
169:
130:
124:
106:
65:
63:
57:
34:
391:
390:
386:
385:
384:
382:
381:
380:
379:
373:deletion review
366:
173:
168:Masterpiece2000
167:
126:
97:
81:
78:
61:
59:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
389:
387:
378:
377:
361:
360:
335:
318:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
264:
263:
262:
261:
196:Masterpiece200
181:
137:
136:
77:
72:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
388:
376:
374:
369:
363:
362:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
336:
334:
330:
326:
322:
319:
317:
314:
310:
306:
303:
302:
293:
289:
285:
284:Leonard^Bloom
281:
277:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
260:
256:
252:
247:
243:
239:
238:
237:
233:
229:
228:Leonard^Bloom
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
182:
180:
176:
170:
164:
160:
157:
156:
155:
154:
150:
146:
142:
134:
129:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
66:
64:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
367:
364:
337:
320:
304:
275:
251:Ham Pastrami
223:
211:
183:
158:
145:Ham Pastrami
138:
58:
45:
43:
31:
28:
62:Alex Muller
242:notability
83:FreeDOS-32
75:FreeDOS-32
50:notability
282:article?
309:Dhartung
133:View log
342:FreeDOS
325:Protonk
280:FreeDOS
246:FreeDOS
192:FreeDOS
141:FreeDOS
100:protect
95:history
54:FreeDOS
321:Delete
305:Delete
161:Fails
159:Delete
128:delete
104:delete
46:delete
340:with
338:Merge
131:) – (
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
354:talk
346:here
329:talk
313:Talk
288:talk
255:talk
232:talk
184:Keep
174:talk
163:WP:N
149:talk
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
350:RCX
348:.
188:Ham
356:)
331:)
311:|
290:)
276:is
257:)
234:)
224:as
212:is
177:)
151:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
352:(
327:(
286:(
253:(
230:(
171:(
147:(
135:)
125:(
123:)
85:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.