188:. Schnews is a small, weekly local publication that has much more of the feeling of a newsletter; I'm loath to consider coverage from a local paper as such on its own to count as notability. The piece in The Independent is more substantial, and seems to be the most mainstream of the papers. As seems to be turning into the standard I like to apply, I'd be more comfortable with another mainstream source or two giving a full story (or a good chunk of a decent-length story) to it.
349:
The Sun (London); Apr 28, 2001, FATBOY SLIM has agreed to play a benefit gig for wacky new political group The Free Party. The DJ will be spinning tunes on May 6 at
Brighton's Concorde 2 for party members. The Free Party recommends drinking "strong lager all night long" while its "foreign policy"
357:
The Sun (London); Apr 23, 2005; DJ Fatboy Slim is backing a group of joke politicians in the election. The Free Party vows to tax Chav's favourite
Burberry and calls for poker to be taught in schools. It has two candidates in the star's home area of Brighton and
295:. I must say that I find the sources to be quite lacking. One is the party website (almost never an indicator of notability) and one is a single mention in a fairly local website. I don't think that's sufficient.
224:
250:
148:- although not electorally successful, they do seem to have received a reasonable amount of press attention at the time. I've just had a very quick look, and have found
123:
169:
90:
85:
94:
17:
205:
The sources do not rescue this article, in my opinion. They are a novelty party with no notability or notable electoral history
77:
377:
Clearly sufficient sourcing to show notability; we are not supposed to judge political groups by the quality of their politics.
130:
Another of many parties I feel should be removed for non-notability or merged into a single article on such minor parties.
403:
36:
402:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
283:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
342:
388:
369:
330:
304:
287:
265:
239:
214:
197:
180:
139:
59:
261:
57:
326:
176:
365:
81:
279:
210:
275:
300:
257:
193:
135:
50:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
274:
The nomination talks of merger and does not seem to have considered the sources. Please see
322:
172:
361:
164:
73:
65:
360:". That article would suggest they had candidates in the 2005 elections as well as 2001.
235:
206:
384:
149:
296:
189:
131:
111:
316:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
231:
379:
159:
154:
396:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
171:), although I don't have access to the full text of that.
344:
plus 2 small articles from The Sun. In their entirety "
118:
107:
103:
99:
321:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
225:
list of United
Kingdom-related deletion discussions
162:from the NME. They also featured in an article in
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
406:). No further edits should be made to this page.
251:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
8:
350:centres on "how to make a Cuban cocktail."
245:
219:
249:: This debate has been included in the
223:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
341:Another article at the Guardian
1:
423:
399:Please do not modify it.
389:02:13, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
370:09:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
331:00:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
305:02:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
288:08:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
266:03:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
240:21:24, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
215:23:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
198:17:26, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
181:12:14, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
140:07:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
60:00:11, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
333:
268:
254:
242:
228:
414:
401:
320:
318:
255:
229:
121:
115:
97:
53:
34:
422:
421:
417:
416:
415:
413:
412:
411:
410:
404:deletion review
397:
314:
213:
165:The Independent
117:
88:
74:Free Party (UK)
72:
69:
66:Free Party (UK)
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
420:
418:
409:
408:
392:
391:
372:
335:
334:
319:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
280:Colonel Warden
269:
243:
217:
209:
200:
183:
128:
127:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
419:
407:
405:
400:
394:
393:
390:
386:
382:
381:
376:
373:
371:
367:
363:
359:
356:
351:
348:
343:
340:
337:
336:
332:
328:
324:
317:
313:
312:
306:
302:
298:
294:
291:
290:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
270:
267:
263:
259:
252:
248:
244:
241:
237:
233:
226:
222:
218:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
199:
195:
191:
187:
184:
182:
179:
178:
174:
170:
167:
166:
161:
157:
156:
151:
147:
144:
143:
142:
141:
137:
133:
125:
120:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
398:
395:
378:
374:
355:Tax on chavs
354:
353:
346:
345:
338:
315:
292:
271:
258:TexasAndroid
246:
220:
202:
185:
175:
163:
160:this mention
153:
150:this summary
145:
129:
52:Juliancolton
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
323:Ron Ritzman
173:Warofdreams
362:Tassedethe
276:WP:BEFORE
347:Biz Bitz
124:View log
297:Tyrenon
293:Comment
207:doktorb
190:Tyrenon
186:Comment
155:Schnews
132:Tyrenon
91:protect
86:history
352:and "
203:Delete
158:, and
119:delete
95:delete
358:Hove.
211:words
168:(see
122:) – (
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
385:talk
375:Keep
366:talk
339:Keep
327:talk
301:talk
284:talk
272:Keep
262:talk
247:Note
236:talk
232:Artw
221:Note
194:talk
177:talk
146:Keep
136:talk
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
46:keep
380:DGG
278:.
256:--
152:in
48:. –
387:)
368:)
329:)
303:)
286:)
264:)
253:.
238:)
227:.
196:)
138:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
56:|
383:(
364:(
325:(
299:(
282:(
260:(
234:(
230:—
192:(
134:(
126:)
116:(
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.