Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Friendship book - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

177:
I wish I could say that I have read all 96,000 Google hits, but I have not. Nevertheless, the sheer number suggests notability, and I doubt it would be difficult to locate a source. As with articles about "pen pals", one can imagine that there are magazines that would have a feature on something of
158:
third party sources. Simply having google hits is not enough... I viewed some of the links, and they referred to a wide variety of items (including scrapbooks with pictures of friends, which is not the same thing). Could you cite some reliable sources attesting to this term's widespread usage?
202:
This activity/phenomenon certainly exists and appears to be somewhat prolific. There is the concern of lack of sources, but that is not necessarily a catch-all reason for deletion when there is no doubt as to the potential for verifiability.
117: 141:- 96000+ Google hits. Just because you haven't heard of something doesn't make it less-than-notable. That being said, this article could use a rewrite. -- 124:
Book made by stapling paper together and writing/drawing on it with friends. Non-notable term that lacks verifiable, third party sources.
90: 85: 94: 17: 241: 77: 216: 165: 130: 319: 36: 219:, but needs more sources to establish notability. If we were going by google hits, every pornstar would be notable 318:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
302: 293: 274: 262: 246: 223: 207: 194: 167: 145: 132: 59: 237: 231:
but rewrite and add sources — this is clearly a legitimate topic. Sourcing shouldn't be too difficult. —
81: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
232: 163: 128: 73: 65: 270:
No sources to establish notability. Claiming "sources are out there" is not good enough.
191: 142: 54: 155: 151: 299: 289: 271: 255: 204: 111: 259: 160: 125: 282:
The source cited is sufficient, & the concept has been used for centuries.
220: 49: 284: 312:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
178:
this nature. No reason to delete this while awaiting a cite to
107: 103: 99: 150:
In fact, the term sounds vaguely familiar to me. But
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 322:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 298:The article currently cites zero sources. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 154:has not been established through 1: 303:22:03, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 294:21:11, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 275:19:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 263:04:07, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 247:19:35, 11 August 2007 (UTC) 224:05:57, 11 August 2007 (UTC) 208:04:43, 11 August 2007 (UTC) 195:22:37, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 168:21:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 146:20:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 133:18:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 60:09:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 342: 328:Ilove friensship books!!!! 315:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 245: 333: 317: 235: 115: 97: 57: 52: 34: 341: 340: 336: 335: 334: 332: 331: 330: 326: 320:deletion review 313: 88: 74:Friendship book 72: 69: 66:Friendship book 55: 50: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 339: 337: 325: 324: 308: 307: 306: 305: 277: 265: 249: 226: 210: 197: 190:or whatever. 172: 171: 170: 122: 121: 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 338: 329: 323: 321: 316: 310: 309: 304: 301: 297: 296: 295: 291: 287: 286: 281: 278: 276: 273: 269: 266: 264: 261: 257: 253: 250: 248: 243: 239: 234: 230: 227: 225: 222: 218: 214: 211: 209: 206: 201: 198: 196: 193: 189: 185: 181: 176: 173: 169: 166: 164: 162: 157: 153: 149: 148: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136: 135: 134: 131: 129: 127: 119: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 61: 58: 53: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 327: 314: 311: 283: 279: 267: 251: 228: 212: 199: 187: 183: 179: 174: 138: 123: 45: 43: 31: 28: 233:Josiah Rowe 188:Family Fun 156:verifiable 152:notability 143:Myles Long 192:Mandsford 300:Jay32183 272:Jay32183 256:LaMenta3 242:contribs 205:LaMenta3 118:View log 213:Neutral 180:Parents 91:protect 86:history 268:Delete 260:Mathmo 161:Eliz81 126:Eliz81 95:delete 221:Corpx 112:views 104:watch 100:links 16:< 290:talk 280:Keep 254:per 252:Keep 238:talk 229:Keep 217:this 215:per 200:Keep 184:Nick 175:Keep 139:Keep 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 51:Neil 46:keep 285:DGG 186:or 182:or 116:– ( 292:) 258:. 240:• 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 48:. 288:( 244:) 236:( 120:) 114:) 76:( 56:ム

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Neil

09:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Friendship book
Friendship book
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Eliz81


18:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Myles Long
20:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
notability
verifiable
Eliz81


21:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Mandsford

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.