455:
No, does not. There can and will be many independent sources about certain establishments. An example can be a bar. There are many articles written about a very popular bar near my scchool that Obama drank at when he went to
Harvard Law, but it doesn't merit a Knowledge article for good reason. Just
303:
Excuse me? I used to be an administrator. And my no longer being an admin has no merit here. This is an Ad
Hominem attack and it actually stings since it has nothing to do with the argument. I suggest you retract that statement please. Also, my goal is to help slim down the articles that don't merit
350:. The sources provided are insufficient to establish notability. It should be noted that any logged-in Knowledge editor can nominate an article for deletion; I had been doing so for years before I became an admin. It may also be relevant that
240:, even with the expansion. It contains a lot of trivial and uninteresting detail about the mall's doings but there is no indication of why this mall is different from the countless non-notable businesses or shopping areas in the world.
515:
No, first off it is never a vote, it's a discussion, so your argument is null in that regard. 85% of the time, it's strictly policy but the rest of the time you need to put on your thinking cap and let common sense dictate.
289:- The mall is a significant structure in the City of Kingston and considering that Yansox is not even an administrator, this article is no different than hundreds of other articles on shopping malls.
567:
It's a renovation on a local paper. It's not like it was the cover of the New York Times. Look at the size of the article you cite. I think your logic is slightly flawed for this process.
120:
265:
154:
369:
I was unable to find any information that would qualify this mall notable. The mall exists, it just doesn't pass the notability requirements for
456:
because it's discussed heavily does not mean it warrants its own article. It can merely be condensed and placed on the main relevant page.
441:. We already have muliple secondary sources which is the definition of notability. A long article entirely about the mall clinches it.
87:
82:
91:
74:
17:
599:
It's far more than a "mention" and local references are not and have never been banned as evidence of notability per
549:
article does seem substantial and it is an independent reliable source, thus this topic passed the core criteria of
629:
36:
628:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
506:
475:
446:
358:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
612:
590:
576:
562:
525:
510:
496:
479:
465:
450:
429:
406:
391:
361:
339:
313:
298:
280:
255:
224:
201:
187:
169:
143:
56:
545:
417:
78:
335:
600:
550:
70:
62:
502:
471:
442:
415:
The source I added (Kennedy, Patrick. "Frontenac Mall to get $ 2 million renovation and facelift",
400:
355:
608:
558:
183:
165:
572:
521:
492:
461:
374:
309:
276:
207:
197:
139:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
331:
294:
421:, 1987-04-16, p. 1) is not trivial. It's a fairly lengthy article entirely about the mall.
586:
nn mall, and being mentioned in the local newspaper isn't a claim to notability neither.
422:
370:
248:
131:
604:
554:
484:
179:
161:
354:
is the editor who created this article, although they did not mention that above. --
568:
517:
488:
457:
305:
272:
193:
135:
50:
108:
470:
That's what the policy says. Arguments for deletion have to be based on policy.
325:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
587:
351:
290:
237:
130:
Fails current notability standards and even based on the level of the failed
487:, Your attitude sounds something surprisingly similar to that of Jonestown.
241:
206:
Nor can I. Mere information about a subject does not make it notable.
622:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
192:
I fail to see how the expansion proved it's actual notability.
501:
So, only votes for delete are allowed to quote policy now?
304:
their own and move it to the town page like it should be.
115:
104:
100:
96:
134:(WP:MALL is just used as a barometer for discussion)
330:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
632:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
266:list of Ontario-related deletion discussions
236:- I agree with Yanksox. This article fails
155:list of Malls-related deletion discussions
399:The sources are only trivial mentions.
264:: This debate has been included in the
153:: This debate has been included in the
7:
178:. I expanded the article a bit. --
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
613:18:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
591:15:03, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
577:01:01, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
57:01:40, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
563:21:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
526:10:52, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
511:04:50, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
497:11:26, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
480:05:40, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
466:00:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
451:19:07, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
430:04:13, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
407:02:28, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
392:02:19, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
362:01:51, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
340:01:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
314:21:02, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
299:19:44, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
281:11:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
256:05:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
225:02:21, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
202:05:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
188:05:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
170:05:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
144:04:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
649:
625:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
546:Kingston Whig-Standard
418:Kingston Whig-Standard
238:notability guidelines
405:and his otters •
44:The result was
543:- The front page
428:
342:
283:
269:
172:
158:
640:
627:
427:
425:
403:
402:Ten Pound Hammer
389:
329:
327:
270:
260:
246:
222:
159:
149:
118:
112:
94:
53:
34:
648:
647:
643:
642:
641:
639:
638:
637:
636:
630:deletion review
623:
423:
401:
385:
381:
375:
323:
252:
242:
218:
214:
208:
114:
85:
69:
66:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
646:
644:
635:
634:
618:
617:
616:
615:
594:
593:
581:
580:
579:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
503:Squidfryerchef
472:Squidfryerchef
443:Squidfryerchef
435:
434:
433:
432:
410:
409:
394:
383:
379:
364:
356:Metropolitan90
344:
343:
328:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
284:
258:
250:
231:
230:
229:
228:
227:
216:
212:
173:
125:
124:
71:Frontenac Mall
65:
63:Frontenac Mall
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
645:
633:
631:
626:
620:
619:
614:
610:
606:
602:
601:WP:NOTABILITY
598:
597:
596:
595:
592:
589:
585:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
565:
564:
560:
556:
552:
551:WP:NOTABILITY
548:
547:
542:
539:
527:
523:
519:
514:
513:
512:
508:
504:
500:
499:
498:
494:
490:
486:
483:
482:
481:
477:
473:
469:
468:
467:
463:
459:
454:
453:
452:
448:
444:
440:
437:
436:
431:
426:
420:
419:
414:
413:
412:
411:
408:
404:
398:
395:
393:
390:
388:
387:
386:
372:
368:
365:
363:
360:
357:
353:
349:
346:
345:
341:
337:
333:
326:
322:
321:
315:
311:
307:
302:
301:
300:
296:
292:
288:
285:
282:
278:
274:
267:
263:
259:
257:
254:
253:
247:
245:
239:
235:
232:
226:
223:
221:
220:
219:
205:
204:
203:
199:
195:
191:
190:
189:
185:
181:
177:
174:
171:
167:
163:
156:
152:
148:
147:
146:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
624:
621:
583:
544:
540:
438:
416:
396:
378:
377:
376:
366:
347:
324:
286:
261:
249:
243:
233:
211:
210:
209:
175:
150:
127:
126:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
352:User:OOODDD
332:Ron Ritzman
382:rbitrarily
215:rbitrarily
424:Paul Erik
273:• Gene93k
605:Oakshade
555:Oakshade
180:Eastmain
162:Eastmain
121:View log
569:Yanksox
518:Yanksox
489:Yanksox
458:Yanksox
306:Yanksox
194:Yanksox
136:Yanksox
132:WP:MALL
88:protect
83:history
52:MBisanz
588:Secret
584:Delete
485:WP:IAR
397:Delete
367:Delete
359:(talk)
348:Delete
291:OOODDD
234:Delete
128:Delete
116:delete
92:delete
46:delete
371:malls
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
609:talk
573:talk
559:talk
553:. --
541:Keep
522:talk
507:talk
493:talk
476:talk
462:talk
447:talk
439:Keep
336:talk
310:talk
295:talk
287:Keep
277:talk
262:Note
244:Reyk
198:talk
184:talk
176:Keep
166:talk
151:Note
140:talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
603:.--
271:--
268:.
251:YO!
157:.
611:)
575:)
561:)
524:)
509:)
495:)
478:)
464:)
449:)
373:.
338:)
312:)
297:)
279:)
200:)
186:)
168:)
142:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
607:(
571:(
557:(
520:(
505:(
491:(
474:(
460:(
445:(
384:0
380:A
334:(
308:(
293:(
275:(
217:0
213:A
196:(
182:(
164:(
160:—
138:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.