393:—i'd really like to be able to take your comment seriously, but without more detail, i don't see how i can. would you mind explaining which of the sources Cullen328 listed above are not reliable and which are not third-party and why? the only one there that's not third party is the list of awards that the book has won, which is on the author's website, but each and every one of these awards is independently verifiable and i'm assuming that Cullen328 just meant that one link as shorthand. also, would you mind explaining what you mean when you say that the "references show that the book is not notable"? how could that happen, that they *show* it's not notable?—
217:
225:
233:
237:
439:
there, DonCalo? Either the references are unreliable and"so-called" (in which case they can't be used to "prove" anything) or they're probative, in which case they aren't unreliable. And even if they are reliable, it beats me how a reference can prove non-notability.
200:
This article is a mess, barely (if at all) remarkable, in my opinion. Serious cleanup would be necessary by an author who is familiar with this book. The article has been tagged with cleanup tags however no substancial effort has been made
169:
76:
240:. In addition, the book won at least 20 awards. If the current version of the article has shortcomings, then it should be improved through the normal editing process. Deletion is not the solution.
130:
163:
411:
71:
334:
ah, just so. i'm sorry about mentioning that without having taken the time to understand the salient point in the closing of the first nomination.—
460:
sufficient reason to delete an article (which isn't IMV that much of a mess anyway and which I see has already been appropriately tagged with
103:
98:
107:
472:
444:
426:
402:
381:
356:
343:
321:
305:
278:
255:
207:
90:
55:
17:
184:
151:
436:
398:
339:
301:
487:
145:
36:
313:
the recent speedy keep was procedural; the nominator had inadvertently omitted to supply a deletion reason, which per
372:. So-called references show that the book is not notable and most of them are not reliable third party sources. -
141:
394:
335:
297:
486:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
314:
191:
289:
94:
352:
I'll leave my comment intact in case anyone else wonders what's going on with the swift re-nomination!
457:
271:
248:
177:
157:
422:
377:
86:
61:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
52:
469:
441:
353:
318:
221:
229:
264:
241:
463:
418:
373:
124:
49:
296:
nominator even admits the purpose is cleanup rather than satisfaction of gng.—
317:
is a reason for speedily keeping. That shouldn't affect this nomination.
294:
this was just speedily kept four hours ago! what's different now?
480:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
77:
Articles for deletion/Full Tilt (novel) (2nd nomination)
120:
116:
112:
176:
190:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
490:). No further edits should be made to this page.
216:The book has been discussed in reliable sources
412:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
263:I added a couple of references to the article.
8:
410:Note: This debate has been included in the
409:
315:Knowledge (XXG):Speedy_keep#Applicability
72:Articles for deletion/Full Tilt (novel)
69:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
68:
24:
456:, per Cullen328. "Being a mess"
348:No problem, and thanks for the
437:having your cake and eating it
1:
473:21:59, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
445:22:33, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
427:19:41, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
403:15:03, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
382:07:30, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
357:22:21, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
344:22:08, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
322:22:06, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
306:05:07, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
279:04:59, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
256:04:46, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
208:03:58, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
56:02:19, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
507:
483:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
67:AfDs for this article:
395:alf.laylah.wa.laylah
336:alf.laylah.wa.laylah
298:alf.laylah.wa.laylah
288:—per Cullen328 and
44:The result was
429:
415:
87:Full Tilt (novel)
62:Full Tilt (novel)
498:
485:
467:
416:
276:
274:Let's discuss it
268:
253:
251:Let's discuss it
245:
206:
195:
194:
180:
128:
110:
34:
506:
505:
501:
500:
499:
497:
496:
495:
494:
488:deletion review
481:
461:
272:
266:
249:
243:
202:
137:
101:
85:
82:
65:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
504:
502:
493:
492:
476:
475:
450:
449:
448:
447:
407:
406:
405:
385:
384:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
327:
326:
325:
324:
283:
282:
281:
198:
197:
134:
81:
80:
79:
74:
66:
64:
59:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
503:
491:
489:
484:
478:
477:
474:
471:
468:since 2009).
465:
459:
455:
452:
451:
446:
443:
438:
434:
431:
430:
428:
424:
420:
413:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
389:
388:
387:
386:
383:
379:
375:
371:
368:
367:
358:
355:
351:
347:
346:
345:
341:
337:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
323:
320:
316:
312:
309:
308:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
290:WP:NOTCLEANUP
287:
284:
280:
277:
275:
270:
269:
262:
259:
258:
257:
254:
252:
247:
246:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
212:
211:
210:
209:
205:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
132:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
78:
75:
73:
70:
63:
60:
58:
57:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
482:
479:
453:
432:
390:
369:
349:
310:
293:
285:
273:
265:
260:
250:
242:
213:
203:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
45:
43:
31:
28:
435:aren't you
164:free images
470:Tonywalton
442:Tonywalton
354:Tonywalton
319:Tonywalton
419:• Gene93k
350:strikeout
204:Petiatil
131:View log
48:. v/r -
433:Comment
374:DonCalo
311:Comment
261:Comment
170:WP refs
158:scholar
104:protect
99:history
370:Delete
267:Cullen
244:Cullen
142:Google
108:delete
458:isn't
391:query
185:JSTOR
146:books
125:views
117:watch
113:links
16:<
464:Plot
454:Keep
423:talk
399:talk
378:talk
340:talk
302:talk
286:keep
238:here
236:and
234:here
232:and
230:here
228:and
226:here
224:and
222:here
220:and
218:here
214:Keep
178:FENS
152:news
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
46:keep
292:.
192:TWL
129:– (
466:}}
462:{{
425:)
417:—
414:.
401:)
380:)
342:)
304:)
172:)
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
421:(
397:(
376:(
338:(
300:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
127:)
89:(
53:P
50:T
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.