418:
translates into a remarkable 1280+ hours of recorded program time. The cast has indicated on air that the bulk of this material has been archived and still exists. This would make FPS a program with more original air broadcast hours than the full run of most network television programs. Coupled with its interactive net-based chat function with its audience, and its documented licensing to legally use ASCAP/BMI/SESAC licensed music (in itself a rarity among net-based broadcasts), I would strongly suggest retaining this article. --
133:
492:
The clientele the show caters to tends to use browsers (Firefox and Safari especially) which do not support Alexa, further making the test questionable. The subject does pass a basic Google and USENET (particularly in alt.fan.furry) test, even with separated keywords. Article definitely needs cleanup
417:
and can be obtained independently by request at www.orlandosentinel.com It has also been recognized in the "Folkmanis
Puppets in TV and Video" section of the Folkmanis manufacturing web site. Additionally, the program's self described 4 hour format coupled with its recent 320th show (1.28.2007)
594:
If this is a verifiable fact, then maintaining consistent production for over 6 years does seem to point to a level of notability. As was pointed out, it's not a level of popularity that is in question (so number of viewers isn't really an issue), but whether the article concerns something that
575:
point out that the nominator's recent activity in WP:AFD suggests (and only suggests, mind) an overarching mindset against the so-called "Furry Fandom", to which this article could be considered a part of. Such a mindset is, by explicit description,
382:: This is one of the best-known recurring productions in the furry community, and it's a fixture at several conventions as well as on the web. I'll ask my friends in that community to see if we can't come up with some sources for notability.
306:
says "Any content which is distributed solely on the internet is considered, for the purposes of this guideline, as web content." Since Funpaw Pawpet Show perform at conventions I'd say FPS isn't distributed solely via the net.
505:
543:, the topic does have valid external citations, and is clearly not a vanity article. It should be tagged for cleanup as suggested by others, but having externally verifiable citations should satisfy the requirements of WP:N.
413:- Independent documentation of this program has been featured in the Orlando Sentinel on Sunday, October 8, 2000. A scanned copy of this article can be found on FPS's own web site at:
345:
This show has been around for a while and with hundreds watching at time of broadcast and even more logging in to watch the replays of that weeks broadcast they are definately notable
140:
121:
254:
471:, has an extremely low Alexa rank of 1,590,648. I would suggest that a single mention in a local newspaper six years ago is insufficient to demonstrate notability.--
580:
a valid reason to delete. I apologise to the nominator if this is not the case, but your contrib history this week certainly raises that as a valid concern.
396:"hundreds of people watching" is not notable. Many television shows have thousands of viewers as a regular audience, and yet are not considered notable. --
598:
546:
424:
348:
321:
94:
89:
98:
149:
602:
428:
360:
81:
179:
17:
325:
452:, the article should be rewritten to be more encyclopedic. Right now, it's just a laundry list of characters and subjects, no? -
558:
165:
641:
318:
Keep! the dedication for keeping going for so long, with 100s of fans, They just as noteable as any tv/internet show!
36:
448:
per 72.188.190.35 above. If there is a citeable newspaper article about the show, isn't this enough for notability?
138:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
258:
626:
610:
584:
562:
529:
515:
497:
479:
461:
436:
400:
386:
374:
333:
311:
292:
280:
263:
211:
63:
640:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
606:
356:
432:
85:
195:
169:
329:
595:
would be considered notable. The above citations and information seem to point to notability. --ChaseT
154:
525:
Right now this article is only a collection of lists. It should be rewritten to be more encyclopedic. --
494:
352:
371:
457:
276:. Not verifiable outside of itself. Has had 2 years to show media attention/notibility and hasn't.--
554:
201:
132:
77:
69:
622:
Needs cleanup, but 72.188.190.35's sources sufficiently address verifiability and notability.
57:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
397:
303:
250:
513:
477:
453:
308:
507:, of which 330 are unique, does not strike me as passing a Google test for Web content.--
540:
273:
246:
581:
550:
383:
623:
526:
490:
229:
217:
185:
50:
115:
164:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
277:
508:
489:
RE: Nydas' comment... Alexa rankings lower than 100,000 tend to be unreliable.
472:
289:
414:
634:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
127:
158:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments,
571:
Oops, forgot to sign, sorry. However, I would also like to
419:
148:
among
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has
111:
107:
103:
302:: For one thing, (since brenneman brings up WP:WEB)
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
644:). No further edits should be made to this page.
493:of lists. Opened list discussion on Talk page.
178:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected
8:
249:or any sources that show that is passes the
152:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
172:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
415:http://pawpet.tv/index.php?press
245:No sources provided to indicate
131:
363:) 07:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
1:
168:on the part of others and to
627:09:59, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
611:02:02, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
585:17:04, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
563:14:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
530:14:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
516:15:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
498:01:47, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
480:22:28, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
462:21:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
437:20:01, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
401:18:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
387:13:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
375:12:47, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
334:07:42, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
312:07:21, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
293:05:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
281:02:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
264:01:47, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
64:14:46, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
272:No shown notibility as per
661:
637:Please do not modify it.
539:Following the spirit of
32:Please do not modify it.
210:; accounts blocked for
180:single-purpose accounts
150:policies and guidelines
601:comment was added by
549:comment was added by
427:comment was added by
351:comment was added by
324:comment was added by
253:guideline. This was
255:previously nominated
162:by counting votes.
141:not a majority vote
511:
504:1,360 Google hits
475:
78:Funday PawPet Show
70:Funday PawPet Show
614:
566:
509:
473:
440:
364:
337:
243:
242:
239:
166:assume good faith
652:
639:
596:
592:Keep and rewrite
544:
523:Keep and rewrite
422:
346:
319:
261:
237:
225:
209:
193:
174:
144:, but instead a
135:
128:
119:
101:
60:
53:
34:
660:
659:
655:
654:
653:
651:
650:
649:
648:
642:deletion review
635:
597:—The preceding
545:—The preceding
423:—The preceding
347:—The preceding
320:—The preceding
259:
227:
215:
199:
183:
170:sign your posts
92:
76:
73:
62:
58:
51:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
658:
656:
647:
646:
630:
629:
616:
615:
588:
587:
568:
567:
533:
532:
519:
518:
501:
500:
487:Keep, Re-write
483:
482:
465:
464:
442:
441:
406:
404:
403:
390:
389:
377:
365:
339:
338:
315:
314:
296:
295:
283:
241:
240:
136:
126:
125:
72:
67:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
657:
645:
643:
638:
632:
631:
628:
625:
621:
618:
617:
612:
608:
604:
603:70.154.59.250
600:
593:
590:
589:
586:
583:
579:
574:
570:
569:
564:
560:
556:
552:
548:
542:
538:
535:
534:
531:
528:
524:
521:
520:
517:
514:
512:
506:
503:
502:
499:
496:
495:70.168.242.19
491:
488:
485:
484:
481:
478:
476:
470:
467:
466:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
444:
443:
438:
434:
430:
429:72.188.190.35
426:
421:
416:
412:
409:
408:
407:
402:
399:
395:
392:
391:
388:
385:
381:
378:
376:
373:
369:
366:
362:
358:
354:
353:72.188.166.77
350:
344:
341:
340:
335:
331:
327:
323:
317:
316:
313:
310:
305:
301:
298:
297:
294:
291:
287:
284:
282:
279:
275:
271:
268:
267:
266:
265:
262:
256:
252:
248:
235:
231:
223:
219:
213:
207:
203:
197:
191:
187:
181:
177:
173:
171:
167:
161:
157:
156:
151:
147:
143:
142:
137:
134:
130:
129:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
636:
633:
619:
591:
577:
573:respectfully
572:
536:
522:
486:
468:
449:
445:
410:
405:
393:
379:
367:
342:
299:
285:
269:
251:web material
244:
233:
221:
212:sockpuppetry
205:
194:; suspected
189:
175:
163:
159:
153:
145:
139:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
411:Strong Keep
398:TommyOliver
384:Jay Maynard
380:Strong keep
372:Terence Ong
300:Strong Keep
288:per above.
454:sthomson06
326:68.202.9.7
309:EarthFurst
247:notability
146:discussion
370:per nom.
343:KEEP THIS
260:brenneman
202:canvassed
196:canvassed
155:consensus
599:unsigned
582:Arakunem
559:contribs
551:Arakunem
547:unsigned
446:Re-write
425:unsigned
361:contribs
349:unsigned
322:unsigned
234:username
228:{{subst:
222:username
216:{{subst:
206:username
200:{{subst:
190:username
184:{{subst:
122:View log
59:(o rly?)
624:Shimeru
527:Evilboy
450:However
198:users:
95:protect
90:history
52:Majorly
469:Delete
394:Delete
368:Delete
304:WP:WEB
286:Delete
278:Dacium
270:Delete
99:delete
510:Nydas
474:Nydas
290:MER-C
176:Note:
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
620:Keep
607:talk
555:talk
541:WP:N
537:Keep
458:Talk
433:talk
357:talk
330:talk
274:WP:N
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
46:keep
578:not
230:csp
226:or
218:csm
186:spa
160:not
120:– (
609:)
561:)
557:•
460:)
435:)
420:JC
359:•
332:)
307:--
257:.
236:}}
224:}}
214::
208:}}
192:}}
182::
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
48:.
613:.
605:(
565:.
553:(
456:(
439:.
431:(
355:(
336:.
328:(
238:.
232:|
220:|
204:|
188:|
124:)
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
