87:
be expanded. I haven't personally seen either of the books cited (save for the online version), and have no idea where I might be able to find them if I were to go looking for them. Nonetheless, someone could do that, and presumably someone might be able to locate other references to the subject.
64:
This is a dictionary definition, and I have serious doubts that it can be expanded. The book cited is a 64 page picture book that aids the reader in furtling. I really don't think there's much to say about putting your fingers through holes in pictures to simulate naughty bits. If somebody could
82:
tag added by Brian. That said, I have no particular objection to having it nominated on AfD and, should the consensus be such, deleted. I do maintain that this seems to be an encyclopedic subject — as in, covered, however briefly, by at least one print encyclopedia — and that it
149:& expand I suppose. I guess we can't expect an article on a victorian custom to expand very quickly. Maybe start with just giving a couple significant examples? Or say where it happened mostly? At least that would move it beyond being a dic. def.
88:
In the mean time, the article in its present form is doing no harm to
Knowledge (XXG). Deleting it, though insignificant in the grand scheme if things, would nonetheless be a net loss for the encyclopedia. —
119:
and expand, this is something that's somewhat significant culturally, and could easily be expanded. Plus, this ever-constant crusade against anything sexual is getting out of hand. --
17:
125:
168:
36:
108:
167:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
94:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
137:
66:
120:
65:
expand it into an encyclopedia article, that would be fine with me, but I don't think that can be done.
153:
140:
130:
111:
99:
89:
69:
52:
78:. I'm the one who wikified the stub after it was added last year, and the one who remove the
58:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
79:
150:
136:
I'm not on a crusade against sexual topics. If you think I am, then you're wrong.
49:
161:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
171:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
44:The result of the debate was
188:
164:Please do not modify it.
53:21:59, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
154:11:10, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
141:20:57, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
131:11:43, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
112:02:21, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
100:19:57, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
70:17:30, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
109:Newyorktimescrossword
138:Brian G. Crawford
129:
98:
67:Brian G. Crawford
179:
166:
123:
92:
34:
187:
186:
182:
181:
180:
178:
177:
176:
175:
169:deletion review
162:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
185:
183:
174:
173:
157:
156:
134:
133:
121:badlydrawnjeff
114:
102:
90:Ilmari Karonen
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
184:
172:
170:
165:
159:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:
143:
142:
139:
132:
127:
122:
118:
115:
113:
110:
106:
103:
101:
96:
91:
86:
81:
77:
74:
73:
72:
71:
68:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
163:
160:
146:
135:
116:
104:
84:
75:
63:
45:
43:
31:
28:
151:JeffBurdges
126:WP:MEMES?
76:Weak keep
107:to dic.
59:Furtling
105:Delete
85:could
16:<
147:Keep
117:Keep
95:talk
80:prod
50:Ezeu
48:. --
46:keep
128:)
124:(
97:)
93:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.