222:
inform you that it does exist, however it is just a standard and therefore a niche thing which is just definition at best. Even if you ask an expert he will be able to give you small paragraphs here and there which define the term(Just as it has been already defined in the article). The basic purport is that it is a term meant for people who have advanced knowledge so the books which mention this will not explain it at length as they think that the guy reading them already knows about an ONE and OTN. If what I wrote is confusing, do forgive me and leave a msg on my TP, i'll try to explain further but basically if you are looking for a book which describes this standard with a definition spanning more than one paragraph, I am not sure that if such a book exists . Have a good day, I just saw the nomination and came to give my two cents
244:
received significant coverage from secondary sources. This of course is something that exists. but the requirement for having an article isn't existence but instead notability. This is not notable. however, content inside notable topics only needs to be reliable and verifiable. so this content could
221:
I would like to suggest that this article is kept on wikipedia as it is something which does exist. I have limited knowledge of it as I have only read about it in various manuals and books, never implemented it as it is not my field. If it has been nominated as something which doesn't exist I can
203:), and I hoped to be able to resolve it, one way or the other. Unfortunately, it's goobledegook to me. I would tag it for expert help, but it has already been tagged for that for 6 years, without help coming. My investigations showed I couldn't verify notability.
168:
301:
121:
162:
128:
17:
323:
290:
227:
385:
40:
183:
150:
351:
94:
89:
51:
200:
98:
286:
262:
250:
223:
266:
81:
381:
36:
144:
176:
140:
246:
366:
340:
313:
294:
278:
254:
245:
find a home in an notable article on the topic. but the topic is not notable in and of itself.
231:
212:
63:
309:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
380:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
190:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
274:
208:
241:
357:
305:
156:
57:
115:
270:
204:
333:
85:
326:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
265:, this isn't nominated on the grounds of not existing, but of not meeting
199:
I looked at this as it has been tagged for notability for 7 years (
77:
69:
374:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
285:
kk ty for mentioning that, I was just giving my two cents.
111:
107:
103:
175:
332:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
189:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
388:). No further edits should be made to this page.
302:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
8:
300:Note: This debate has been included in the
299:
354:. No indication of separate notability.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
405:
341:01:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
314:14:44, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
295:17:11, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
279:13:58, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
255:12:48, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
232:07:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
213:06:37, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
352:Optical Transport Network
52:Optical Transport Network
377:Please do not modify it.
348:Redirect, possibly merge
32:Please do not modify it.
367:15:29, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
64:23:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
201:Wheelchair Epidemic
287:FreeatlastChitchat
263:FreeatlastChitchat
224:FreeatlastChitchat
365:
343:
316:
396:
379:
364:
362:
355:
338:
331:
329:
327:
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
60:
34:
404:
403:
399:
398:
397:
395:
394:
393:
392:
386:deletion review
375:
358:
356:
344:
334:
322:
320:
136:
127:
92:
76:
73:
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
402:
400:
391:
390:
370:
369:
330:
319:
318:
317:
297:
282:
281:
257:
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
401:
389:
387:
383:
378:
372:
371:
368:
363:
361:
353:
349:
346:
345:
342:
339:
337:
328:
325:
315:
311:
307:
303:
298:
296:
292:
288:
284:
283:
280:
276:
272:
268:
267:WP:NOTABILITY
264:
261:
258:
256:
252:
248:
247:Bryce Carmony
243:
239:
236:
235:
234:
233:
229:
225:
220:
215:
214:
210:
206:
202:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
61:
54:
53:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
376:
373:
359:
347:
335:
321:
259:
237:
218:
216:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
56:
50:redirect to
49:
47:
31:
28:
163:free images
360:Sandstein
269:. Thanks,
382:talk page
306:• Gene93k
37:talk page
384:or in a
324:Relisted
219:Comment'
122:View log
39:or in a
260:Comment
169:WP refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
59:MBisanz
271:Boleyn
242:WP:GNG
238:Delete
205:Boleyn
141:Google
99:delete
336:Nakon
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
78:G.798
70:G.798
16:<
310:talk
291:talk
275:talk
251:talk
240:per
228:talk
209:talk
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
350:to
191:TWL
120:– (
55:.
312:)
304:.
293:)
277:)
253:)
230:)
211:)
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
308:(
289:(
273:(
249:(
226:(
217:'
207:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.