Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/G4 2006 - Knowledge

Source 📝

182:
This article may be not be encyclopedic material, but it might be a starting point for something big in the future and what not a place to keep it as a archive than in Knowledge? The referencing method may be wrong as maybe the author do know know how to do citation. Maybe, wiki could ask help from
158:. Certainly is not suitable for Knowledge. Three of the given "references" at time of writing are blogs and are in fact the same, as are another three, implying very little or no real references to backup any sort of notability. The article's quality might be acceptable, but its content is not. 117: 197:
Your opinion is bound to be bias as you are the article creator. You admit the article is not of encyclopedia material, when Knowledge
17: 90: 85: 94: 220: 36: 219:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
77: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
184: 143:. Alas, this is a well written article and i'd love to keep it, however the topic is very non notable. 53: 205: 174: 162: 147: 134: 81: 59: 131: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
73: 65: 201:
an encyclopedia, and hence you are admitting that it also isn't suited for this purpose.
171: 50: 202: 159: 155: 144: 125: 128: 111: 48:, partially per the keep argument admitting lack of encyclopedic value. -- 213:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
124:
Subject of article does not meet notability requirements of
170:
per above. Well written, but not encyclopedic material.
107: 103: 99: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 223:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 183:the public to aids its citation method. 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 206:15:25, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 187:23:00, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 175:20:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 163:20:14, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 148:03:46, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 135:03:27, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 60:02:04, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 240: 216:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 185:User:HweiMing/Hweiming 231: 218: 115: 97: 56: 34: 239: 238: 234: 233: 232: 230: 229: 228: 227: 221:deletion review 214: 88: 72: 69: 54: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 237: 235: 226: 225: 210: 209: 208: 189: 188: 177: 165: 150: 122: 121: 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 236: 224: 222: 217: 211: 207: 204: 200: 196: 193: 192: 191: 190: 186: 181: 178: 176: 173: 169: 166: 164: 161: 157: 154: 151: 149: 146: 142: 139: 138: 137: 136: 133: 130: 127: 119: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 61: 58: 57: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 215: 212: 198: 194: 179: 167: 152: 140: 123: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 172:Rettetast 203:Bungle44 160:Bungle44 145:THE KING 118:View log 195:Comment 129:Nv8200p 91:protect 86:history 74:G4 2006 66:G4 2006 168:Delete 156:WP:NOT 153:Delete 141:Delete 126:WP:ORG 95:delete 46:delete 112:views 104:watch 100:links 55:desat 16:< 180:Keep 132:talk 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 51:Core 116:- ( 199:is 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 120:) 114:) 76:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Core
desat
02:04, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
G4 2006
G4 2006
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
WP:ORG
Nv8200p
talk
03:27, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
THE KING
03:46, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
WP:NOT
Bungle44
20:14, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Rettetast
20:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
User:HweiMing/Hweiming
Bungle44

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.