240:- more than meets GNG as a result of third-party sourcing. The article could do with a bit of expansion but that is not a reason for deletion. It is worth noting that the proposer has been frantically trying to undermine the article through the deletion of citations - including through the use of sock puppets - and having not been satisfied with the outcome of that approach has come here.
495:
I see clear evidence of use as an enduring term. Note that G5 (education) is not a suitable Google search phrase for this - try G5 university etc. I do not see the benefit in deletion, as it is a reasonable topic for users to search for and an explanation of what it refers to and how it originated is
206:
dont feel this a serious grouping, is referenced extremely poorly, doesn't even highlightidea of reseach funding, and offers extremely little. Relies simply on a newspaper article back in 2004, we no evidence this grouping exists today, which remember was nothing to do with pure reputation, was about
285:
Not true, even as regards the Times Higher
Education - the THE article is very clear that the G5 is not an abstract concept invented by the THE, but an actual grouping which it is reporting on. Even the name 'G5' was not a creation of the THE. The THE was merely the first to report the existence of
220:
The proposer is an indefinitely blocked sockpuppet of the also indefinitely blocked
Edinburghgeo, and also has a likely conflict of interest due to a close connection with the University of Edinburgh and a perception on their part - in my view wholly unfounded, but they appear to see things rather
175:
429:
472:
518:
136:
169:
337:: agree very much with previous comment, the references are not acceptable, are primarily newspaper references, seems an extremely minimal grouping to get a wiki article
452:
362:
221:
differently - that the G5 grouping and the presence of an article about it in WP is somehow against the interests of the
University of Edinburgh.
109:
104:
72:
113:
190:
402:
157:
96:
17:
353:
286:
the grouping, which for obvious reasons wished to remain low-key and therefore did not telegraph its existence to the world.
531:
324:
274:
151:
575:
40:
147:
212:
556:
535:
505:
484:
464:
444:
419:
374:
326:
295:
276:
249:
231:
78:
197:
66:
571:
36:
501:
390:
341:
480:
460:
440:
415:
398:
291:
245:
227:
183:
100:
514:
370:
349:
208:
163:
527:
55:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
570:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
319:
269:
497:
386:: on balance would say delete, references not great, article doesn't really mean a lot.
259:: No significant coverage outside the newspaper that created the term so therefor fails
476:
456:
436:
411:
394:
310:
287:
241:
223:
92:
84:
552:
544:
366:
345:
263:
as the newspaper that creates the term cannot be seen as interdependent to the term.
260:
522:
306:
130:
314:
264:
548:
313:
the block evasion, I have no problem with that despite my !vote above.
564:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
126:
122:
118:
182:
547:however this article could do with some expansion.
519:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 December 4
513:
This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (
430:
list of United
Kingdom-related deletion discussions
473:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
578:). No further edits should be made to this page.
305:Should an admin feel inclined to delete this as
453:list of Education-related deletion discussions
196:
8:
471:Note: This debate has been included in the
451:Note: This debate has been included in the
428:Note: This debate has been included in the
470:
450:
427:
410:Struck comment by (yet another) sock.
207:raising research funding at the time
7:
24:
215:) 00:39, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
405:) 17:00, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
356:) 10:27, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
1:
517:). I have transcluded it to
79:23:46, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
557:10:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
536:16:46, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
506:23:18, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
485:17:48, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
465:17:46, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
445:17:44, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
420:22:00, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
375:13:17, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
361:Struck comment from duckish
327:02:18, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
296:02:43, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
277:02:16, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
250:02:05, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
232:23:20, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
595:
567:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
496:not a simple dicdef. --
543:Appears to just pass
511:Automated comment:
408:
359:
48:The result was
487:
467:
447:
433:
422:
407:
393:comment added by
382:
377:
363:sock of nominator
358:
344:comment added by
333:
222:
586:
569:
525:
434:
409:
406:
387:
360:
357:
338:
322:
317:
272:
267:
216:
201:
200:
186:
134:
116:
75:
69:
61:
58:
34:
594:
593:
589:
588:
587:
585:
584:
583:
582:
576:deletion review
565:
523:
388:
339:
320:
315:
270:
265:
143:
107:
91:
88:
73:
67:
59:
56:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
592:
590:
581:
580:
560:
559:
538:
508:
489:
488:
468:
448:
424:
423:
379:
378:
330:
329:
300:
299:
298:
280:
279:
253:
252:
204:
203:
140:
93:G5 (education)
87:
85:G5 (education)
82:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
591:
579:
577:
573:
568:
562:
561:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
539:
537:
533:
529:
526:
520:
516:
512:
509:
507:
503:
499:
494:
491:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
469:
466:
462:
458:
454:
449:
446:
442:
438:
431:
426:
425:
421:
417:
413:
404:
400:
396:
392:
385:
381:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
355:
351:
347:
343:
336:
332:
331:
328:
325:
323:
318:
312:
308:
304:
301:
297:
293:
289:
284:
283:
282:
281:
278:
275:
273:
268:
262:
258:
255:
254:
251:
247:
243:
239:
236:
235:
234:
233:
229:
225:
219:
214:
210:
209:Edinburghgeog
199:
195:
192:
189:
185:
181:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
149:
146:
145:Find sources:
141:
138:
132:
128:
124:
120:
115:
111:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:
86:
83:
81:
80:
76:
70:
64:
63:
62:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
566:
563:
540:
510:
492:
389:— Preceding
383:
340:— Preceding
334:
302:
256:
237:
217:
205:
193:
187:
179:
172:
166:
160:
154:
144:
54:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
170:free images
498:AJHingston
572:talk page
541:Weak Keep
477:Rangoon11
457:Rangoon11
437:Rangoon11
412:Rangoon11
395:Maria1357
288:Rangoon11
242:Rangoon11
224:Rangoon11
37:talk page
574:or in a
403:contribs
391:unsigned
367:WilliamH
354:contribs
346:Frantic1
342:unsigned
137:View log
74:contribs
39:or in a
524:Snotbot
311:WP:DENY
303:Note :
176:WP refs
164:scholar
110:protect
105:history
57:Phantom
545:WP:GNG
515:step 3
384:Delete
335:Delete
261:WP:GNG
257:Delete
148:Google
114:delete
307:WP:G5
218:Note:
191:JSTOR
152:books
131:views
123:watch
119:links
60:Steve
16:<
553:talk
502:talk
493:Keep
481:talk
461:talk
441:talk
416:talk
399:talk
371:talk
350:talk
321:king
292:talk
271:king
246:talk
238:Keep
228:talk
213:talk
184:FENS
158:news
127:logs
101:talk
97:edit
68:talk
50:keep
549:IJA
534:»
521:.
309:to
198:TWL
135:– (
555:)
530:•
504:)
483:)
475:.
463:)
455:.
443:)
432:.
418:)
401:•
373:)
365:.
352:•
316:Mt
294:)
266:Mt
248:)
230:)
178:)
129:|
125:|
121:|
117:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
77:\
52:.
551:(
532:c
528:t
500:(
479:(
459:(
439:(
435:—
414:(
397:(
369:(
348:(
290:(
244:(
226:(
211:(
202:)
194:·
188:·
180:·
173:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
150:(
142:(
139:)
133:)
95:(
71:|
65:/
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.