364:
as licensed radio stations are generally considered notable. The two stations share some programs that are broadcast first on one and then later on the other, but each has their own format. Substantial precedent exists for dab pages that disambiguate two or more radio or television stations with the
135:
Article is a dab page with 2 entries one of which is a redlink. The 2 stations on the page are in the same town and I'm pretty sure have alot more in common than they do differences. PROD was removed with the explanation that this is the "standard" dab page but, that doesn't make it anymore required
381:
Sorry. I didn't realise we had different standards for Dab pages depending on what the subject was and I definitely wasn't trying to argue any sort of notability (being well aware that it was notable). Is there a special procedure that needs to be followed to withdraw a nomination?
178:
My understanding from previous similar things was that a see also note at the top is best when there are only two entries. Also, both KKINs are the same station, broadcasting a different format on each of its bandwidth assignments but, with crossover where applicable
426:; but for this nomination, I don't know that the omission would have been fixed. Neither I nor the nominator have listened to this particular Minnesota radio station, but I'm glad that someone who is familiar with the subject has written about it.
422:, and nominator was correct that it was disambiguity page that resolved no amibiguity. With the addition of the new article, and the change in circumstances, it's a legitimate dab page. In this case, I congratulate
396:
I don't know, but if you note below your original nomination at the top of this thread that you want to withdraw it, either an admin will close the discussion eventually or someone will do a non-admin close.
291:
128:
443:: To be honest, I am in Virginia, but the information is available from the FCC, Radio-Locator, and 100000watts.com....so it makes any station page easy to make. -
320:
237:(which was previously up for deletion, kept). These are generally notable as they are connected to the radio station pages (also always notable). -
162:. An argument for keeping rather than redirecting is that the page also alerts a user to the existence and the frequency of both stations.
347:
as issue has been addressed per WikiProject Radio
Station standards for disambiguating two or more stations with the same base callsign. -
68:
197:
The redlink no longer exsists (page was made yesterday, 9/17) and WP:WPRS SOP is to create a disambig page for the two stations and
17:
136:
or appropriate for this particular case. The "dab" should be deleted and both stations should be merged to this location.
183:) and therefore doesn't require separate articles. Much better to have one really good article than 1 stub and a redlink.
476:
36:
475:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
95:
90:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
233:: This is a disambig page for a radio station. This is standard MOS for WP:WPRS disambig pages. Please see
99:
452:
272:
246:
214:
333:
304:
82:
387:
188:
141:
431:
167:
352:
459:
446:
435:
406:
391:
374:
356:
338:
309:
279:
266:
253:
240:
221:
208:
192:
171:
145:
52:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
402:
370:
327:
298:
423:
383:
184:
137:
427:
163:
154:
No harm if it's kept or deleted. Forseeably, the same people who created the article
348:
49:
116:
398:
366:
155:
86:
419:
260:
159:
469:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
234:
202:
78:
58:
180:
418:
When the nomination was made, there wasn't an article for
123:
112:
108:
104:
292:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
479:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
201:to have one article for both stations, see
321:list of Radio-related deletion discussions
319:: This debate has been included in the
290:: This debate has been included in the
66:
7:
65:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
460:19:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
436:19:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
407:12:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
392:08:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
375:04:41, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
357:23:49, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
339:23:27, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
310:23:27, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
280:23:55, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
254:23:26, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
222:19:19, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
193:08:00, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
172:16:29, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
146:10:43, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
53:21:12, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
158:would write an article about
496:
69:Articles for deletion/KKIN
472:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
263:page has been made. -
64:AfDs for this article:
365:same base call sign.
205:(among others). -
458:
341:
324:
312:
295:
278:
252:
220:
487:
474:
457:
455:
449:
444:
336:
330:
325:
315:
307:
301:
296:
286:
277:
275:
269:
264:
251:
249:
243:
238:
219:
217:
211:
206:
126:
120:
102:
44:The result was
34:
495:
494:
490:
489:
488:
486:
485:
484:
483:
477:deletion review
470:
453:
447:
445:
424:User:Jasynnash2
334:
328:
305:
299:
273:
267:
265:
247:
241:
239:
215:
209:
207:
122:
93:
77:
74:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
493:
491:
482:
481:
465:
464:
463:
462:
412:
411:
410:
409:
378:
377:
359:
342:
313:
283:
282:
257:
256:
227:
226:
225:
224:
175:
174:
133:
132:
73:
72:
71:
63:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
492:
480:
478:
473:
467:
466:
461:
456:
450:
442:
439:
438:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
414:
413:
408:
404:
400:
395:
394:
393:
389:
385:
380:
379:
376:
372:
368:
363:
360:
358:
354:
350:
346:
343:
340:
337:
331:
322:
318:
314:
311:
308:
302:
293:
289:
285:
284:
281:
276:
270:
262:
259:
258:
255:
250:
244:
236:
232:
229:
228:
223:
218:
212:
204:
200:
196:
195:
194:
190:
186:
182:
177:
176:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
150:
149:
148:
147:
143:
139:
130:
125:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
70:
67:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
471:
468:
448:NeutralHomer
440:
415:
361:
344:
316:
287:
268:NeutralHomer
242:NeutralHomer
230:
210:NeutralHomer
198:
181:as seen here
151:
134:
45:
43:
31:
28:
416:Speedy Keep
362:Speedy Keep
345:Speedy Keep
329:Fabrictramp
300:Fabrictramp
231:Speedy Keep
384:Jasynnash2
335:talk to me
306:talk to me
185:Jasynnash2
138:Jasynnash2
428:Mandsford
164:Mandsford
156:KKIN (AM)
349:Dravecky
129:View log
441:Comment
420:KKIN-FM
261:KKIN-FM
160:KKIN-FM
152:Comment
96:protect
91:history
50:John254
399:Mlaffs
367:Mlaffs
124:delete
100:delete
127:) – (
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
454:Talk
432:talk
403:talk
388:talk
371:talk
353:talk
317:Note
288:Note
274:Talk
248:Talk
235:WDXE
216:Talk
203:WDXE
189:talk
168:talk
142:talk
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
79:KKIN
59:KKIN
46:keep
326:--
323:.
297:--
294:.
199:not
451:•
434:)
405:)
390:)
373:)
355:)
332:|
303:|
271:•
245:•
213:•
191:)
170:)
144:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
48:.
430:(
401:(
386:(
369:(
351:(
187:(
179:(
166:(
140:(
131:)
121:(
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.