184:'s) writeup, for whatever reason, of the one-time actions or habits of one of their friends. It's almost certainly named after the surname of the friend, and had it been more personally identifying it would have strayed across the line into attack article territory. Further corroboration that this is people abusing Knowledge (XXG) to make up hoax articles directed at their friends is the fact that the IP address that removed the AFD notice,
173:
When an article is deliberately written in vague terms about the present day, for which one can be obviously fairly exact as to dates, then warning bells sound that the writer is trying to make a subject appear more encyclopaedic than it really is. This article's discussion of "the early parts of
153:
This one was tricky. "Knightsmith" appears to be a fairly common name in parts of the UK, and a Google search will return truckloads of poolside pictures of people with that name. But
Coventry (the area where the shot allegedly originated) does not have people named "Knightsmith", and the article
120:
201:
This is not even an attempt at a real encyclopaedia article, and it is close to the borderline of being speedily deletable as a combination of attack article and hoax vandalism.
223:
hoax. Speaking as a resident of
Coventry and a regular pool player, I've never heard of this. No ghits at all. The content of the article is clearly untrue.
155:
17:
195:
87:
82:
140:
91:
74:
247:
36:
246:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
189:
232:
214:
168:
144:
56:
185:
181:
78:
177:
174:
the 21st century" is a strong telltale that this article isn't coverage of an encyclopaedic subject.
128:
136:
70:
62:
210:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
228:
132:
206:
50:
108:
224:
198:), also traces back to the same city, Coventry, as mentioned in the article.
240:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
158:
returns the
Knowledge (XXG) article and two false positives. --
154:
gives no third-party sources attesting to usage of this shot.
115:
104:
100:
96:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
250:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
176:What it clearly is, is two persons' (
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
57:13:27, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
233:19:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
215:13:58, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
169:13:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
145:08:58, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
267:
243:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
131:, no references. —
44:The result was
166:
258:
245:
165:
163:
118:
112:
94:
53:
34:
266:
265:
261:
260:
259:
257:
256:
255:
254:
248:deletion review
241:
159:
114:
85:
69:
66:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
264:
262:
253:
252:
236:
235:
218:
171:
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
263:
251:
249:
244:
238:
237:
234:
230:
226:
222:
219:
217:
216:
212:
208:
204:
199:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
179:
172:
170:
162:
157:
152:
149:
148:
147:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
242:
239:
220:
202:
200:
192:
175:
160:
150:
126:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
186:86.20.30.86
182:Sevenballer
156:This search
127:Neologism,
71:Knightsmith
63:Knightsmith
161:Blanchardb
178:Mmccurrie
196:contribs
167:- timed
141:contribs
133:RHaworth
121:View log
207:Uncle G
180:'s and
151:Delete.
88:protect
83:history
52:MBisanz
225:JulesH
221:Delete
203:Delete
129:MADEUP
116:delete
92:delete
46:delete
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
229:talk
211:talk
190:talk
137:Talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
231:)
213:)
205:.
143:)
139:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
227:(
209:(
193:·
188:(
164:-
135:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.