409:- I added better content with a couple of more sources, including a couple of CEO interviews, and removed anything that could be considered advertising. The article has gone from being nominated for deletion due to being advertorial and weakly sourced with three items to better with nine, and less advertorial. I read
500:
Hopefully I purged the advert stuff - I don't like that any more than you do. I cringed when I viewed the first version of this article from almost ten years ago, written by the founder no less. Since none of the sources I used existed then, it would have almost certainly been immediately speedily
455:
Most of the things you mention - funding, interviews, financing, etc. - are what usually makes a business notable. I agree that the relocation to the historic building is more notable for nearby residents familiar with the sign, but I'll leave it in. Being listed as a top ten vendor in the SaaS
216:
An amazing example how we have changed since 2009, we unfortunately have to use AfD instead as I frankly would've PRODed myself, my searches have noticeably found nothing better as the current sources are nowhere near convincing; simply not the needed substance.
566:
476:
be notable and acceptable, it's still not convincing enough for notability as that's also simply information about its activities and there has been consensus showing this is also advert-like such as for enticing investors and clients.
552:-- the article is currently neutrally worded which is an improvement. But the sources remain weak and the coverage does not raise to the level of CORPDEPTH. There are also trivial industry awards, and funding and product news, i.e.
55:
There's a suggestion that even if the company is not notable, their products might be. But, there was no significant discussion on that, so whether an article could be written about the product remains an open question. --
413:
and don't think any of these sources are routine, brief, passing or simple references. Please clarify your interpretation(s) so I know what you are referring to. The whole article now comes from this independent media
185:
84:
432:
This would still not enough as the coversge itself is simply about either their funding and financing, relocating and other usual business activities such as interviews, none of it is substantial.
318:
138:
243:
301:
272:
179:
79:
456:
space and an emerging vendor to watch by two different noted tech pubs suggest this is a refimprove candidate rather than a delete, but let's see what others think.
145:
52:. There were some sources discovered during the course of the AfD, but those sources didn't gain any traction convincing the other discussants.
393:
17:
111:
106:
115:
542:
510:
495:
465:
450:
423:
401:
371:
347:
327:
310:
293:
264:
235:
63:
98:
200:
167:
523:
356:
338:-- sorry, still reads like an advertorial about the company's history and products. Does not meet CORPDEPTH in my view.
585:
40:
490:
445:
288:
259:
230:
161:
506:
461:
419:
389:
157:
410:
382:
581:
472:
I will simply note that several other AfDs have noted that while a considerable amount of such coverage
367:
343:
323:
306:
102:
36:
207:
553:
478:
433:
276:
247:
218:
193:
94:
69:
540:
60:
397:
562:
502:
457:
415:
386:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
580:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
339:
173:
533:
57:
132:
574:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
526:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
359:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
128:
124:
120:
192:
532:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
85:
Articles for deletion/KnowledgeTree (2nd nomination)
365:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
319:
list of North
Carolina-related deletion discussions
206:
561:However, I'm seeing discussions on the product in
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
588:). No further edits should be made to this page.
244:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
302:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
273:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
317:Note: This debate has been included in the
300:Note: This debate has been included in the
271:Note: This debate has been included in the
242:Note: This debate has been included in the
316:
299:
270:
241:
77:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
80:Articles for deletion/KnowledgeTree
76:
24:
1:
543:17:26, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
511:17:09, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
496:00:34, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
466:23:52, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
451:22:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
424:22:17, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
64:01:07, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
605:
402:19:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
372:02:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
348:04:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
328:06:35, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
311:06:35, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
294:05:12, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
265:05:12, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
236:05:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
577:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
75:AfDs for this article:
545:
374:
330:
313:
296:
267:
596:
579:
568:
567:
538:
531:
529:
527:
493:
488:
448:
443:
370:
364:
362:
360:
326:
309:
291:
286:
262:
257:
233:
228:
211:
210:
196:
148:
136:
118:
34:
604:
603:
599:
598:
597:
595:
594:
593:
592:
586:deletion review
575:
546:
534:
522:
520:
491:
479:
446:
434:
375:
366:
355:
353:
322:
305:
289:
277:
260:
248:
231:
219:
153:
144:
109:
93:
90:
73:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
602:
600:
591:
590:
570:
569:
558:
557:
530:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
470:
469:
468:
427:
426:
404:
363:
352:
351:
350:
332:
331:
314:
297:
268:
214:
213:
150:
89:
88:
87:
82:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
601:
589:
587:
583:
578:
572:
571:
564:
560:
559:
555:
551:
548:
547:
544:
541:
539:
537:
528:
525:
512:
508:
504:
499:
498:
497:
494:
489:
486:
482:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
454:
453:
452:
449:
444:
441:
437:
431:
430:
429:
428:
425:
421:
417:
412:
408:
405:
403:
399:
395:
391:
388:
384:
380:
377:
376:
373:
369:
368:North America
361:
358:
349:
345:
341:
337:
334:
333:
329:
325:
324:North America
320:
315:
312:
308:
307:North America
303:
298:
295:
292:
287:
284:
280:
274:
269:
266:
263:
258:
255:
251:
245:
240:
239:
238:
237:
234:
229:
226:
222:
209:
205:
202:
199:
195:
191:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
159:
156:
155:Find sources:
151:
147:
143:
140:
134:
130:
126:
122:
117:
113:
108:
104:
100:
96:
95:KnowledgeTree
92:
91:
86:
83:
81:
78:
71:
70:KnowledgeTree
68:
66:
65:
62:
59:
53:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
576:
573:
563:Google books
549:
535:
521:
503:Timtempleton
484:
480:
473:
458:Timtempleton
439:
435:
416:Timtempleton
411:WP:CORPDEPTH
406:
387:Presidentman
383:WP:CORPDEPTH
378:
354:
335:
282:
278:
253:
249:
224:
220:
215:
203:
197:
189:
182:
176:
170:
164:
154:
141:
54:
49:
47:
31:
28:
565:, such as
340:K.e.coffman
180:free images
554:WP:ROUTINE
582:talk page
414:coverage.
37:talk page
584:or in a
536:UY Scuti
524:Relisted
501:deleted.
398:Talkback
394:contribs
357:Relisted
139:View log
58:RoySmith
39:or in a
550:Comment
186:WP refs
174:scholar
112:protect
107:history
487:wister
483:wister
442:wister
438:wister
381:Fails
379:Delete
336:Delete
285:wister
281:wister
256:wister
252:wister
227:wister
223:wister
158:Google
116:delete
61:(talk)
50:delete
474:could
201:JSTOR
162:books
146:Stats
133:views
125:watch
121:links
16:<
507:talk
492:talk
462:talk
447:talk
420:talk
407:Keep
390:talk
344:talk
290:talk
261:talk
232:talk
194:FENS
168:news
129:logs
103:talk
99:edit
208:TWL
137:– (
509:)
464:)
422:)
400:)
392:·
385:.
346:)
321:.
304:.
275:.
246:.
188:)
131:|
127:|
123:|
119:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
556:.
505:(
485:T
481:S
460:(
440:T
436:S
418:(
396:(
342:(
283:T
279:S
254:T
250:S
225:T
221:S
212:)
204:·
198:·
190:·
183:·
177:·
171:·
165:·
160:(
152:(
149:)
142:·
135:)
97:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.