466:
it's pretty apt here). The notability concern seems plausible since there aren't really any independent sources in the article; but I have to think some must be available, if only due to the substantial advertising campaign (which included a super bowl commercial). For now I think the article should be kept and tagged for its notability issue. I'd have trouble endorsing deletion of a company that everyone's heard of; I think that's the spirit of the notability policy, even if not "to the letter". Edit: Didn't notice
Rankiri's comment above. It appears independent sources do exist, so changing to plain keep.
492:
for finding sources for the article, and I would like to encourage the editors who are working on the article to actually use these sources. It's not sufficient that an article can potentially be sourced properly, the sources need to be used in the article, and independent secondary sources should be
347:
I have first added a PROD template to the article. The template was deleted without any significant changes to the article's content. The article needs to be based on sources such as those that you have given. I don't have any particular interest in this company, so I don't think it's my job to find
465:
If someone is disruptively trying to drive traffic to a company's
Knowledge (XXG) page, that can and should be dealt with, but deleting the company's article due to that is silly, and akin to throwing out the baby with the bathwater (even though it usually irritates me when people use that phrase,
493:
used in preference to self-published sources. I hope that the editors who are working on the article will spend more time sourcing the article properly, rather than constructing infoboxes, quarreling over the addition of "alternative services", moving the page etc.
196:
Sources do not indicate sufficient notability. Promotional. Various implausible redirects such as "ŠŠ¾Š¼ŠøŃŠµŃ Š³Š¾ŃŃŠ“Š°ŃŃŃŠ²ŠµŠ½Š½Š¾Š¹ Š±ŠµŠ·Š¾ŠæŠ°ŃŠ½Š¾ŃŃŠø" have been created, indicating a deliberate effort to generate as much traffic on the page as possible through search engine
165:
348:
the sources and to rewrite the article. Instead of looking for sources, the editors of the article have spent their time trying to associate it with the
Russian KGB. If this changes, the article will probably be kept.
384:, which is quite amusing), and I'm not seeing an overriding promotional bent to the article besides a basic clear explanation of the service. I would suggest however that the article be
377:
Does it hurt to do some basic research before nominating for deletion? As seen above plenty of sources for the company, the company has a major national advertising campaign (featuring
159:
120:
292:. Please, when nominating due to sourcing or notability concerns, make a good-faith attempt to confirm that such sources don't exist. Google News immediately shows a number of
93:
88:
97:
125:
80:
310:
441:
should be an entry about
Knowledge Generation Bureau, not about the Soviet intelligence service. Those waters don't need to be muddied again.
180:
147:
17:
84:
275:
be more notable if we could eventually find citations, but that's for separate articles). I agree with the original nomination.
141:
510:
450:
420:
365:
342:
284:
271:: Aside from Bot problems identified by Rankiri, the company does not seem to be notable on its own (some of their products
259:
229:
214:
137:
525:
36:
311:
http://durangoherald.com/sections/Features/Southwest_Life/2010/01/10/Special_agents_answer_questions_about_everything/
76:
68:
325:
315:
187:
524:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
297:
153:
300:
concerns, I don't think that the problem is so serious it can't be solved through less drastic methods.
476:
411:
393:
305:
173:
58:
396:
with this title (used as sub-branding) retained as a redirect as "KGB" is the more used branding.
446:
220:
The redirects in question were created by a malfunctioning bot. I just reverted its actions. ā
338:
280:
225:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
389:
502:
357:
251:
206:
320:
293:
468:
399:
50:
296:
sourcesāincluding a lengthy review from TIMEāthat cover the subject in detail. As for
442:
489:
334:
276:
221:
330:
114:
488:
I am withdrawing this request for the deletion discussion. I would like to thank
495:
350:
326:
http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=98228
316:
http://www.gadling.com/2009/01/23/product-review-knowlege-generation-bureau-kgb/
244:
199:
378:
518:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
306:
http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1874375,00.html
438:
430:
242:
and similar edits, I don't think we should blame the bot.
434:
433:
as possible. There was already a page-move fiasco when
239:
110:
106:
102:
321:
http://hamptonroads.com/2009/09/textmessage-answer-man
172:
186:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
528:). No further edits should be made to this page.
331:http://www.620wtmj.com/news/local/45359222.html
8:
429:I'd prefer you kept it as far away from
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
511:01:45, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
451:22:57, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
421:20:20, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
366:20:09, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
343:19:59, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
285:19:15, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
260:19:40, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
230:18:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
215:17:49, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
77:Knowledge Generation Bureau
69:Knowledge Generation Bureau
545:
238:Thank you! However, given
521:Please do not modify it.
481:01:29, 25 Jan 2010 (UTC)
63:02:06, 25 Jan 2010 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
46:nomination withdrawn
506:
480:
418:
361:
255:
210:
62:
536:
523:
509:
507:
504:
500:
482:
475:
473:
419:
414:
408:
407:
402:
364:
362:
359:
355:
258:
256:
253:
249:
213:
211:
208:
204:
191:
190:
176:
128:
118:
100:
64:
57:
55:
34:
544:
543:
539:
538:
537:
535:
534:
533:
532:
526:deletion review
519:
503:
496:
494:
469:
467:
412:
405:
400:
397:
358:
351:
349:
252:
245:
243:
207:
200:
198:
133:
124:
91:
75:
72:
51:
49:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
542:
540:
531:
530:
514:
513:
483:
456:
455:
454:
453:
424:
423:
371:
370:
369:
368:
328:
323:
318:
313:
308:
302:
301:
287:
265:
264:
263:
262:
233:
232:
194:
193:
130:
126:AfD statistics
71:
66:
48:by nominator.
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
541:
529:
527:
522:
516:
515:
512:
508:
501:
499:
491:
487:
484:
479:
478:
474:
472:
464:
462:
458:
457:
452:
448:
444:
440:
437:decided that
436:
432:
428:
427:
426:
425:
422:
417:
415:
404:
403:
395:
394:KGB (service)
391:
387:
383:
382:
381:Gilmore Girls
376:
373:
372:
367:
363:
356:
354:
346:
345:
344:
340:
336:
332:
329:
327:
324:
322:
319:
317:
314:
312:
309:
307:
304:
303:
299:
295:
291:
288:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
267:
266:
261:
257:
250:
248:
241:
237:
236:
235:
234:
231:
227:
223:
219:
218:
217:
216:
212:
205:
203:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
127:
122:
116:
112:
108:
104:
99:
95:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
73:
70:
67:
65:
61:
60:
56:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
520:
517:
497:
485:
477:
470:
460:
459:
409:
398:
385:
380:
374:
352:
298:WP:PROMOTION
289:
272:
268:
246:
201:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
59:
52:
45:
43:
31:
28:
160:free images
505:TalkĀ toĀ me
379:Kirk from
360:TalkĀ toĀ me
254:TalkĀ toĀ me
209:TalkĀ toĀ me
197:crawlers.
471:Equazcion
53:Equazcion
486:Withdraw
443:Hairhorn
121:View log
490:Rankiri
435:someone
413:chatter
390:KGB.com
386:renamed
335:Rankiri
277:Mattnad
222:Rankiri
166:WPĀ refs
154:scholar
94:protect
89:history
498:Cs32en
353:Cs32en
269:Delete
247:Cs32en
202:Cs32en
138:Google
98:delete
294:WP:RS
181:JSTOR
142:books
115:views
107:watch
103:links
16:<
463:Keep
461:Weak
447:talk
401:Nate
388:as
375:Keep
339:talk
290:Keep
281:talk
240:this
226:talk
174:FENS
148:news
111:logs
85:talk
81:edit
439:KGB
431:KGB
392:or
273:may
188:TWL
123:ā¢
119:ā (
449:)
341:)
333:ā
283:)
228:)
168:)
113:|
109:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
87:|
83:|
445:(
416:)
410:(
406:ā¢
337:(
279:(
224:(
192:)
184:Ā·
178:Ā·
170:Ā·
163:Ā·
157:Ā·
151:Ā·
145:Ā·
140:(
132:(
129:)
117:)
79:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.