222:. They are on a CNET list, but it's a fairly large list and not really the type of thing that would give absolute notability. I do love the website and I've used it for sourcing in the past, but I have to say that I don't think it passes notability guidelines. If anyone can find reliable sources that talk about the website in depth, I'm willing to be swayed. With the risk of launching a potential lengthy argument from fellow fans of the site, I just don't see anything that goes into depth to show that this passes GNG.
213:
Kotaku after another editor pointed it out to me, albeit not with the intention to have it deleted. In any case, the problem here is that while this is certainly a very popular site and something that you could use as a reliable source, there really isn't a lot of coverage that is specifically about
178:
131:
445:
397:
172:
385:
214:
the website. Popularity doesn't translate into notability, it just makes it more likely something will gain coverage. Other than a handful of articles such as
338:
331:
340:
367:
What's wrong with keeping the article as a stub? It has three reliable sources noting it, one of them critically assessing its writing style.
138:
333:
501:. Also confused why the "not a majority vote" tag was place here. Minus Niemti's nonsense comment, the responses have been policy-based.
17:
587:
521:
I was wondering about the vote tag myself, removed for now. If it becomes an issue it can be added, as is the usual practice.
346:. A simple notability tag or talk page discussion was all that was needed, leaping straight to AFD is not the way forward.
483:
415:
215:
643:
40:
327:
193:
335:
556:
160:
104:
99:
480:
108:
548:
403:
391:
468:- I'm pretty sure at least 2 of the sources it currently has are sufficient; besides, it itself counts as a
344:
91:
507:
639:
552:
299:
226:
154:
36:
581:
372:
342:
264:
67:
620:
186:
150:
604:
319:
529:
354:
624:
608:
593:
560:
535:
512:
487:
457:
437:
376:
360:
306:
287:
268:
252:
233:
73:
502:
477:
453:
433:
200:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
638:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
53:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
296:
283:
248:
223:
498:
323:
219:
572:
368:
260:
59:
469:
613:
329:
409:
166:
473:
449:
429:
243:
d, did
Patriarchy just rear its rape head again? - Patricia Hernandez reports." --
125:
279:
244:
95:
551:, but it's got some press coverage. I added some more sources to the article.
326:
as far as I can see. Brief search turned up several sources: Referenced Kotaku
295:
I didn't initially think about that- a redirect would be a good idea.
87:
79:
218:, there really isn't anything out there to show that Kotaku passes
632:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
611:
frequently cited by others and significant in its market. —
209:
Fair notice: I first noticed the lack of RS and coverage
497:- per Rehevkor's sources. Seems like plenty to meet the
422:
121:
117:
113:
185:
199:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
646:). No further edits should be made to this page.
386:list of video game-related deletion discussions
446:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
8:
444:Note: This debate has been included in the
384:Note: This debate has been included in the
443:
414:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
472:, not that that matters that much.
274:On a second thought tho, I guess a
420:
239:"Kotaku's Knowledge (XXG) article
24:
278:would avoid a red link crisis. --
570:- per Ansh666 and Sergecross73.
408:
1:
402:
625:11:14, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
594:02:46, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
561:23:22, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
536:21:53, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
513:21:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
488:20:02, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
458:19:54, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
438:19:54, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
396:
377:12:01, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
361:11:58, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
307:10:36, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
288:10:24, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
269:20:01, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
253:10:17, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
234:09:44, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
74:15:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
390:
663:
322:was followed here. Passed
635:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
48:The result was
623:
460:
440:
654:
637:
616:
612:
592:
590:
584:
579:
553:NinjaRobotPirate
532:
525:
510:
505:
427:
426:
425:
418:
412:
406:
400:
394:
383:
357:
350:
318:. Not convinced
303:
259:Let's be civil.
230:
204:
203:
189:
141:
129:
111:
72:
70:
64:
63:
34:
662:
661:
657:
656:
655:
653:
652:
651:
650:
644:deletion review
633:
614:
588:
582:
573:
571:
549:I don't like it
547:. Personally,
534:
530:
523:
508:
503:
421:
389:
359:
355:
348:
337:. About Kotaku
301:
228:
146:
137:
102:
86:
83:
68:
61:
60:
57:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
660:
658:
649:
648:
628:
627:
597:
596:
589:contributions)
564:
563:
541:
540:
539:
538:
528:
516:
515:
491:
490:
462:
461:
441:
380:
379:
364:
363:
353:
312:
311:
310:
309:
272:
271:
256:
255:
207:
206:
143:
82:
77:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
659:
647:
645:
641:
636:
630:
629:
626:
622:
618:
610:
606:
602:
599:
598:
595:
591:
585:
580:
578:
577:
569:
566:
565:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
543:
542:
537:
533:
527:
520:
519:
518:
517:
514:
511:
506:
500:
496:
493:
492:
489:
486:
485:
482:
479:
475:
471:
467:
464:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
442:
439:
435:
431:
424:
417:
411:
405:
399:
393:
387:
382:
381:
378:
374:
370:
366:
365:
362:
358:
352:
345:
343:
341:
339:
336:
334:
332:
330:
328:
325:
321:
317:
314:
313:
308:
305:
304:
298:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
285:
281:
277:
270:
266:
262:
258:
257:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
237:
236:
235:
232:
231:
225:
221:
217:
212:
202:
198:
195:
192:
188:
184:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
152:
149:
148:Find sources:
144:
140:
136:
133:
127:
123:
119:
115:
110:
106:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
84:
81:
78:
76:
75:
71:
65:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
634:
631:
600:
575:
574:
567:
544:
522:
504:Sergecross73
494:
476:
465:
347:
315:
300:
275:
273:
240:
227:
210:
208:
196:
190:
182:
175:
169:
163:
157:
147:
134:
49:
47:
31:
28:
607:as being a
316:Speedy keep
297:Tokyogirl79
224:Tokyogirl79
173:free images
576:satellizer
261:Samwalton9
62:Salvidrim!
640:talk page
605:WP:NMEDIA
450:• Gene93k
430:• Gene93k
320:WP:BEFORE
37:talk page
642:or in a
609:WP:VG/RS
276:redirect
216:this one
132:View log
39:or in a
526:ehevkor
351:ehevkor
302:(｡◕‿◕｡)
229:(｡◕‿◕｡)
179:WP refs
167:scholar
105:protect
100:history
54:WP:SNOW
509:msg me
499:WP:GNG
324:WP:WEB
280:Niemti
245:Niemti
241:delete
220:WP:WEB
151:Google
109:delete
88:Kotaku
80:Kotaku
56:keep.
617:KNOWZ
583:(talk
470:WP:RS
369:Diego
211:about
194:JSTOR
155:books
139:Stats
126:views
118:watch
114:links
16:<
621:TALK
615:HELL
603:per
601:Keep
568:Keep
557:talk
545:Keep
495:Keep
474:Ansh
466:Keep
454:talk
434:talk
423:Talk
373:talk
284:talk
265:talk
249:talk
187:FENS
161:news
122:logs
96:talk
92:edit
58:☺ ·
50:keep
388:. (
201:TWL
130:– (
52:.
586:-
559:)
456:)
448:.
436:)
428:)
416:RS
375:)
286:)
267:)
251:)
181:)
124:|
120:|
116:|
112:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
66:·
619:▎
555:(
531:✉
524:Я
484:6
481:6
478:6
452:(
432:(
419:·
413:·
410:S
407:·
404:B
401:·
398:N
395:·
392:G
371:(
356:✉
349:Я
282:(
263:(
247:(
205:)
197:·
191:·
183:·
176:·
170:·
164:·
158:·
153:(
145:(
142:)
135:·
128:)
90:(
69:✉
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.